/g/ - uhh geminibros how are we feeling today? - Technology

Anonymous

06/16/26(Tue)19:18:22 No.109072885

File: HK9BJgdacAA8iUa.jpg (598 KB, 4096x2705)

598 KB JPG

Anonymous 06/16/26(Tue)19:18:22 No.109072885 Archived

uhh geminibros how are we feeling today?

Anonymous
06/16/26(Tue)22:01:06 No.109073712

Anonymous 06/16/26(Tue)22:01:06 No.109073712

gemini is trash. i would rather use deepseek.

Anonymous
06/16/26(Tue)22:07:06 No.109073749

Anonymous 06/16/26(Tue)22:07:06 No.109073749

>another meaningless metric

They are all trash

Anonymous
06/16/26(Tue)22:11:41 No.109073769

Anonymous 06/16/26(Tue)22:11:41 No.109073769

Meaningless data
>Thinking bla bla bla
Thinking what? Time it takes to provide a response? Accuracy of response? Completeness of response? Coherence of response?
Did a zoomer make that shitty inforgraph?

Anonymous
06/16/26(Tue)22:15:20 No.109073781

Anonymous 06/16/26(Tue)22:15:20 No.109073781

>>109073769
The benchmarks are literally all listed

Anonymous
06/16/26(Tue)22:21:45 No.109073800

Anonymous 06/16/26(Tue)22:21:45 No.109073800

File: gemini-3-5__benchmarks__light.gif (120 KB, 1187x889)

120 KB GIF

>>109072885
gemini 3.1 pro is outdated.
use gemini 3.5 flash.
https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-3-5

Anonymous
06/17/26(Wed)02:12:34 No.109074781

Anonymous 06/17/26(Wed)02:12:34 No.109074781

>>109073800
What the fuck is this naming scheme

Anonymous
06/17/26(Wed)02:28:12 No.109074825

Anonymous 06/17/26(Wed)02:28:12 No.109074825

>>109072885
Is this even true. Any chad here been vibecoding with it?

Anonymous
06/17/26(Wed)03:15:19 No.109075003

Anonymous 06/17/26(Wed)03:15:19 No.109075003

>>109073800
3.5-flash is far worse than pre-crippling 3.0-flash, but better than 3.1-pro.