[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1761842293251975.png (384 KB, 791x716)
384 KB PNG
+40000 lines of code in 5 days and no one knows how the project works

I fucking hate AI
>>
im tired bros
>>
>>109076907
just ask the AI to explain the codebase to you
>>
Just ask the AI to explain how it works
>>
>>109076907
That's like half the Temple OS. But I imagine your codebase would be more like the synagogue of satan kind of place.
>>
The funny thing is, this isn't AI, this is still people being people. Rushing code out in bulk has always produced spaghetti. Doesn't matter if it's your team of juniors, or offshore Indians, whoever. We're just moving at a scorching pace now so the spaghettification is immediate.

You can use AI responsibly. You can iterate, do code in modular pieces/chunks, force it to be more readable and organized. You can use languages, frameworks, and patterns that help it maintain structure. People like to hate on mature tech like Angular and C#/.NET, but I've found the opinionated structure, repetitive patterns to really help AI stay on the guardrails and not start crufting together its own bespoke spaghetti web. People in cute, trendy languages and paradigms are not going to have a great time. Freedom isn't a good thing for your little codemachine.
>>
File: noko nose pick.png (417 KB, 558x800)
417 KB PNG
>>109076962
I once saw some retard gloating on lobsters about how their project was totally AI free and they used StackOverflow, just like the good ol' days! As if it's a huge own to have copy-pasted large swathes of code off of SO compared to a chatbot. Very unserious people.
>>
>>109076962
ok but ceo saw on linkedin that you can 10x your output so we will expect 10x more lines of code or else
>>
>>109076907
that doesn't matter, as long as you have the AI thorough tests also
>>
>>109077167
and who will write the tests? If you have a finished and expansive test suite you already have a working and tested product. Not to mention tests aren't omnipotent, it's impossible to test everything. And TDD is a meme
>>
>>109077211
the AI writes the tests. you need to ensure the product works, you don't need to understand it. the CEO of a company sells a product which he doesn't understand, he pays developers to build, maintain and QA it. instead of developers, now the AI does it. what's the problem?
>>
>>109077242
the problem is when your broken ass app leaks everyones data and breaks lol. Then your ai shits itself and is incapable to fix the problem after which you have to remake a product a new. Pretty similar process companies go through when outsourcing to third world for pennies
>>
The flip side is that the code runs and you just made a prototype that wouldn't have taken weeks or months in 2 days. Yes it's no fun reviewing the AI generated code and rewriting it to not be terrible, but I'm still more productive with it than without it.
>>
>>109076907
>implying that programmers understand their own code either
it's one of the oldest inside jokes in programming
>>
>>109076907
typical day at Microsoft
>>
>>109077272
>your broken ass app leaks everyones data and breaks
you didn't QA it properly then. same happens with projects done by humans
>Then your ai shits itself and is incapable to fix the problem
why wouldn't it be able to fix it?
>similar process companies go through when outsourcing to third world for pennies
so even if i wanted to concede all your points, you agree that AI is as good as humans
>>
>>109076907
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything
not so hard now is it
>>
>>109077320
all development processes like qa and testing are meant to enhance entire process, if you move one part of it (coding) entirely to ai or jeets you're making everything worse.
>why wouldn't it be able to fix it?
because ai isn't intelligent, it sometimes goes in a loop not fixing a problem and fucking up something else. If you work on a larger app than another notes app you'll know this.
If you have someone who understands the code they can guide ai to unshit itself. But you in all your genius removed anyone who understands the codebase and is now at the mercy of stohastic probability machine randomly figuring it out.
>so even if i wanted to concede all your points, you agree that AI is as good as humans
i wouldn't call jeets humans
>>
>>109076907
As long as it turns on and does the thingy, ur good
>>
>>109076962
Thanks GPT
>>
File: 1677902477934477.png (1.24 MB, 1024x768)
1.24 MB PNG
>>109076907
>>109076951
>>109076962
>>109077149
Everything going on as planned.
>>
>>109076907
Tell the LLM to write documentation for it
>>
File: 1772980263363913.jpg (75 KB, 840x888)
75 KB JPG
>>109076907
this meme is very real it seems then
>>
>>109076937
Shrimple as.
>>
>>109076951
spekaing of tmeple OS is their any vibe slopped continuation of it?
>>
>>109076937
>>109076940
that'll be $20
>>
>>109076907
just ask the AI retard



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.