[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (674 KB, 1562x575)
674 KB PNG
What do you think of automated security scanners?
>>
>>109098358
They can be useful, but I generally find that they generate more noise than signal with lots of false positives.
>>
>>109098358
What app is that?
>>
what is the word
>>
>>109098358
Oh god, who told the fucking normies about those?
Those can be helpful tools, you just need the brain and the experience to understand what it's telling you and what kinds of attacks you might expose your users to and when that's not a real risk.

Most sites don't have a CSP and that's perfectly fine.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.