I remember reading an article in summer/late 2003 about holographic memory. It was not just a theory, there were prototypes.While back then USB sticks were 64MB and very very slow, the holographic memory thingy could already store a few GB and read/write at high speed. It was also very small, about the size of a nail, like microSD would later be. It was also supposed to be very cheap to produce.But a while after we learned that a company (I think it was Pioneer) had bought the patent just to be sleeping on it.And here we are, 23 years later, with an apocalyptic storage shortage.Isn't this the best time for a company to resurrect holographic memory and save us? Is the memory chips cartel keeping it from happening?
yep it’s obviously a conspiracy
>>109101743I dont belive this. >They had a cure for cancer in 2003, the world was going to end in 2012, people dont know that H2O is the most important climate gas, flying cars and drone-delivery was one step away in 2013, and we should have AGI yesterday. Probably some jew that managed to "invent" some bullshit, pretend that it is real by making a patent, have some slimy jews verify the pattent, have some jew-friends write articles about it, and in the end sell it to some clueless sucker.
>>109103959Interesting theory.But I prefer thinking that it existed and was purposely silenced by electronic giants in order to keep their monopoly, because there were a few such cases in the past.Also, for it was just basically a piece of glass or synthetic crystal, not only it would have been very cheap (and the cheaper a product, the less money our masters make on it from taxes), but also not prone to break, people would not have needed to buy new ones often. Basically, an awesome technology for humanity but bad for business.
>>109104153And government hardware wouldn't use this extremely cheap and powerful tech as much as possible?
>>109104153>"Holographic memory"Sounds like a jewish scam to me. How can memeory be Holographic??
Project Silica (quartz memory)Should've called it Looking Glass.
>>109101752the conspiracy is asians being asians and not wanting to do anything new ever
>>109105381>Looking Glassa reference to an Art Bell theme.
>>109104372It can be, but the device to read it would be chunky and expensive. It's not about semi transparent pictures displayed in thin air, it's about a physical medium (usually something solid and thin) being able to display an image that was burned onto it with a lazer. Not one image and not two.Well... Have you seen a holo sticker? That's the primitive implementation with literally has a picture on it and not designed to have data encoded in it, but to have some goofy stuff visible to naked eye. But same thing basically.It's actually mid cold war era tech. Nothing new really.It was supposed to be like a CD with hundreds of layers or something like that. But again, hard to read that data. And probably hard to make it rw, mostly likely would've been read only.
>>109105701>it would bellm tier stupid shitIt would be, until it isn't, then you llm brained tards will be looping how it's faster and better.engineering hurdle <> engineering impossibility
It gets hard to read/write fast and with low power with optical addressing.
>>109101743why are you still using ai images from 2024 if ai had improved a lot nowadays?
>>109105980No idea what the fuck you wanted to say. I'm pretty sure prototypes exist. And they are slightly worse than what I described, they do not resemble a finished device, more like a lab stand. But it functions like I described. Not in theory, in reality.>>109106267Yes. Especially the low power part. If I had to guess, I'd say they would use something like a DLP tech (the thing used in 2D video projectors and in some resin 3D printers) or a rotating medium with very complex head, similar to regular optical disks, but more complex head part. Either way, it would not have been cheap. That is why it never entered consumer market as a mass manufactured product.But the tech is real, it's not some bull shit sci-fi at all.
>>109101743>bought the patent just to be sleeping on itYou have no idea (or maybe you do) how many centuries behind we are compared to where we could be because of the patent system (and individualistic capitalism ideas overall).
>>109106481tpbp. Anon here gets it.Fuck stalled century™.
>>109106481The patent system should be abolished along with copyright.
