if laptops were THICK, like 3cm thick (not the screen, but the area that contains motherboard and a keyboard ontop of motherboard) you could install THICK copper heatspreaders ontop of CPU and GPUthis would help with the cooling and laptops would have severely powerful componentsnobody has realized this potentialthere is also one further additional benefit: thicker batteries = more cells = more power hours
>>109109065Goy, you're thinking too much.You obviously don't want better batteries and stronger components. You want another paper-thin, fragile and absolutely impossible to repair toy. Don't try to deny it, it's dangerous to be different.
>>109109065>thicker batteries = more cellsWhat if someone made a thin laptop where most of the motherfucker is a battery and it's still relatively powerful?
>>1091090651. thickness doesn't dissipate heat, surface area does. so in that regard it's a worse design.2. you don't need a dedicated GPU if you're not a gamer. a strong CPU is sufficient for programming. even if you're doing game dev it's good because you're forced to optimize your pile of shit.
>>109109079A computer is unusable without a GPU unless the only thing you're doing is web browsing, which I suppose you are
>>109109065an m5 max macbook already destroys supercomputer processors. there's no need to be thick.>>109109094show me a thicker notebook than 64gb m5 macbook pros that processes LLM data faster.
>>109109094wrong
>>109109065This is the size of a budget heatsink that you would put on a low end 65W cpu like a Ryzen 5600 or an Intel 12400Tell me how are you going to fit it inside a laptop
>>109109065I wish everything was built as a series of interchangeable daughter boards connected to a main board. With a very strong (almost government level legally binding) emphasis on backwards compatibility and legacy support Bloatfags fuck off.My main PC would be:MainboardCPU DBGPU DBRAM DBEthernet DB1x SATA SSD DB3x USB DB (1x2.0 2x3.x)Audio DBEach DB has socketable chips, over engineer the through-put of each DB and its connector, badda bing badda boom.
>>109109079>you don't need a dedicated GPU if you're not a gamer.Engineers beg to differ. They need workstation mobile gpus in their laptops. A lot of Engineers have switched to laptops because of the ease of transport and trade between team members that need it. You get alot more bang for your buck when a single workstation can be transported from room to room and employee to employee without much thought on how to transfer it. It can be well worth the limited performance so long as it's capable of doing the job on demand. People forget that the gb203 die in the 5080 is a mobile gpu die. The 5080 was designed with laptops in mind.
*dabs*
>>109109065Thick laptops existhttps://shop.mntre.com/products/mnt-reformhttps://www.crowdsupply.com/mnt/mnt-reform-next
>>109109079>thickness doesn't dissipate heat, surface area does. so in that regard it's a worse design.you sound like an absolute retard>same surface area as before>but doubhe the thickness, double the amount of heatsink material you can put ontop of CPU and GPU -> better heat dissipation
>>109109116>an m5 max macbook already destroys supercomputer processorsLOL he believes Apple's propaganda
>>109109065i think something 1.5x thicker than a macbook with a 2x battery would be enough for me before becoming too heavy for practical usage
The real problem is that computers, like everything else, are not made to make customers happy, not made to be the best possible, they are made so the company makes money.There are better solutions to cool down computers but they are not profitable so they are not used.We could have laptop a few millimeters thick that never overheat, technologies exist, but they are too expensive.We are barely starting to use graphene at last. We could have used it for over twenty years, but it was too expensive to manufacturate. And you know what? A better solution than graphene have existed for years, I don't remember its name, it's made of two different atoms instead of carbon, but we won't use it before long, because it's expensive.
>>109109065or you can use a fast modern and power efficient cpu arch that doesn't need 1kg of copper to keep it from overheating
>>109111329This honestly, back in the day we had to deal with thick af laptops due to lithography of the era and the TDP of chips, any usable laptop was at least 25w on the low end to 47w on the high end, but we're at a point where a 6w to 15W CPU kicks ass for laptop usage,and the graphics built into the Intel and Ryzen chips are totally fine for what people want it for, not even mentioning the switch to small flash storage devices which means laptops be fast, thin, and get good battery life
>>109109116>show me a thicker notebook than 64gb m5 macbook pros that processes LLM data faster.Any laptop with a decent Nvidia GPU
>>109111365its still retarded because we absolutely need to have an option for 50W TDP laptopnone exists
