>>109137316
i'm sorry you work and shill for a company so retarded they try to revive an irrelevant dead brand whose only potential customers that would be susceptible to nostalgia factor are all 60+ years old

What even am I looking at? A 2600 repro? But why would it be so big?

>>109137631
thank you for getting the age range right
the average poster would think that this is for the 40+ set
and I’m over 40 and too young to give a shit about something like this

consoles are dead

>>109137316
Im sorry your stepfather didn't beat you more frequently.

>>109137680
Desktop PCs are even more dead, though

>>109137316
Why would you buy an Atari 2600 emulation box when you can just use the x86 machine you already have to emulate the 2600?

>>109137646
A SBC in a custom case running linux with some built-in game launcher larping as a game console.

a smart tv can already do that with an app