You now remember the fact Windows 10 (32-bit) demanded a mere 1GB of RAM. How times change!
>>109154557also Ubuntu officially demands 6GB now
>>109154557>You now remember the fact Windows 10 (32-bit) demanded a mere 1GB of RAM. How times change!total bullshit, I've been using 1GB RAM way back in WinXP days.
>>109154596Konachan is 18.
>>109154557Even XP wasn't viable on 1GB of RAM by 2008.
>>109154811minor coded doe so bad
>>109154820better*FTFY
how did jeets destroy technology so quickly
>>109154847Just look at the state of their environment. That explains it.
>>109154557i love technology ouuuhhh
How else do you want gigabytes for? Sicko.
>>109154557
>>109154583>using jewbuntu in 2026
>>109154557cool image
>>109154557what was the use of 32-bit windows versions after XP again? exchange inability to use 64-bit software for NTVDM and 16-bit windows 3.x apps?
>>109154816SP3. SP2 ran on 256MB.
>>109155582>6GB of RAM minimumayyylamo
>>109154557I demand konata's flat chest
>>109154557Whoa, OP looks like that!?
>>109155973>for a comfortable experienceThis is a guide article, so I'd expect this factors in a web browser, file managing, doing some text editing, all while also leaving the system room for a small disk cache. That's not the same as a "minimum to be able to run at all".
>>109156341That's insane man, Windows 8.1 was 800MB on idle.
>>109156520that was 13 years ago
>>109156533And...?
>>109156554growth, ram inflatation
>>109156575How much RAM do PCs use right now compared to back then? I doubt there is much of a difference,
>>109155973why the fuck would you use ubuntu anyways
>>109156600>1gb was a lot not even 20 years ago
>>109155948Nobody gives a fuck child, you didn't use it so you don't know what it's like to run Windows XP with 256MB of RAM. It was barely tolerable with 768MB, but anyone who wasn't a turbo poor would use 2GB.
>>109156600XP idled around 200 MB.Windows 11 idles around 4 GB
The problem isn't the OS itself, it's the UIs which are increasingly coded by jeets using webshit frameworks that launch an entire browser process just to display a fucking menu.
>>109156951I recall putting XP on a Thinkpad that had a Pentium 1 and 32MB of RAM, if I recall correctly. It took hours and hours to install but once it was done it ran fine for day to day use.
>>109157067she's not even young though, just erotic
>>1091548161GB of ram is more than enough. 512 Even. XP is a little more bloated an 2k. But close enough for the following comparison. Back 2010 I was running an 800Mhz Athlon with 320MB of ram. The machine was highly capable, I was able to browse the web, download torrents, watch tv rips. I could open dozens of tabs in opera and the machine remained usable.
>>109154557640KB should be enough for everyone
>>109157307i miss the old times brehs