[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Intel_logo_web.jpg (26 KB, 620x350)
26 KB JPG
Aren't all their fabs outdated when it comes to processors?

Can't they shift their production from processors to RAM?

At least they would be making something useful instead of some crap processor.
>>
Thats what they did when they were formed in the 20th century, selling sram and dram chips before making cpus.
>>
>>109165819
Nobody wants to invest time and money in RAM manufacturing because the AI/datacenter bubble could pop at any moment.
And even if it doesn't, there's also the chance a competitor is already on the problem and by the time you get your shit out, they could be already balls deep on the market slashing prices even further.

The RAM shortage sounds like easy money, but it's a highly risky gamble if you aren't in the memory business already and have all the knowho, infrastructure and supply chain ready to go.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.