>takes 30 seconds to load in your path
>>109169164mpv.rocks
>solves media playback in your path*>*not for freetards tho
>>109169164works fine on my antix and xubuntu machines, what are you using?
it will play whatever you throw at it tho’
>>109169632This, it would be nice if XFCE knew how to scale the mf on my 4KTV but VLC just werks
Why does this shit always have that corruption for a second or two when playing a video?
>>109169832because it's streaming-brained video player and that nature bogs it down even when playing local files.
>>109169880This, and because it treats everything like a stream, it can play partial files that are still being downloaded like the way old internet used to buffer videos.
>>109169164Excluding the VLC install dir in Windows Defender solved the problem for me, anon
>>109169234>>*not for freetards thoyou think I paid for any of this?
>>109170554i love how windows defender always fucking rams anything that uses the filesystem even a tiny bitgood luck compiling shit with unsanctioned IDEs without defender taking 30-50% of your cpu and disk usage
>>109169234>when you get filtered by installing mpv on Windows
>>109169164Could have apt installed mpv and played the video in 30 seconds
I was under the impression that my PC was too potato to even play a movie because of this garbage app.
>>109169303This is a problem on Windowst. dual boot user
>>109169164werks on my machinethat being said mpv is generally better for most use cases
>>109170730not om my windows, get better computah
>>109169164mpv used to not have this problem when wm4 was in charge but now that haasn and dmg are in charge it does>>109169234this also takes forever to load if you have lavf enabled which if you don't what's the point of using it instead of vlc
>>109171178I will clarify that I used scoop to install VLC
>>109169164So it's not just me? I was thinking it was a hard drive issue
>>109170600It's a small price to pay for security. Using windows defenders real-time protection is the only safe and effective way to keep your PC safe.
>When you want the quality of mpv without the autismI love this player.
>>109169164>>takes 30 seconds to load in your pathMy PC has DDR4 RAM and an 8GB graphics card and VLC loads instantly and plays perfectly?
>>109169182with all teh scripts it really feeel slike you create your own video player but without really needing to know too much techinmical shit.
>>109169164Took 2 seconds to load this on my potato-class laptop
>>109169164If you have a gaming PC there's no reason not to use mpv instead
>>109172968>8Gb of RAM on PenrynWhat sticks you got nigga? I should put that in my Latitude E6400 if its not too much money
>>109169164literally never encountered VLC taking even a second to load
>>109172986Seriously, it's a fuckin lightweight
>>109172984>8Gb of RAM on PenrynI believe it's the GM45 chipset that handles RAM on this machine. This chipset maxes out at 8GB.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_chipsets#Core_2_mobile_chipsets>What sticks you got nigga?See pic for RAM info.>I should put that in my Latitude E6400 if its not too much moneyCost & time may be a problem. I initially bought two sticks of RAM from China, one of which turned out to be faulty (Memtest86+ rules). Luckily I got refunded half the price. I had to buy a second stick of RAM from an American company which was almost as pricey as the two-pack was.Good luck, man.
>>109172424>MPV>qualityKek!Pot Player is the objectively best video player anyway!
>>109172374NO. It must be some sort of update. I have an i9 with 64GB ram and it still takes 10 seconds to start the first VLC video. After the first one it starts up normal. Before whatever changed, it started up instantly.
>>109172923So? If not, then suffer
>>109173844>sufferif youre a woman
>>109170591Free as in freedom retard
>>109169182Should I bother with celluloid?
>>109174936Yes, just check the faq if start time is long.
>>109169164Started happening for me after the latest update.Rebuilding the plugin cache was what fixed it in the end.
>>109172475you dont seem so sure
