I'll wait
>>109173826parabola openrc edition
XubuntuKubuntu
>>109173849>Kubun-KRASHES
Linux Mint Cinnamon Edition
>>109173856based (I use Arch)
Fedora (or any other repo that doesn't have bullshit snaps)
>>109173852Skill issue. KDE won. If other people would also have problems then nobody would use it. You're just not very good with computers. Feel free to respond with a meme face so you don't have to admit that I'm right.
>>109173928this, and we don't put illegal shit in our repos and we don't do shady shit like enabling 3rd party repos in the installer mind you that contain actual spyware like Ubuntu does.
>>109173849that's just ubuntu with a de>>109173856that's also just ubuntu with a de
Bazzite
>>109173826DebianLMDEEndless OS (for certain usecases)
>>109173826Debian.Why default everything to snaps? Weird and gives the 'ick.
>>109173847Okay anon, you've convinced me. I'm installing right now and it better be as good as arch but without the proprietary slopware.>>109174073>illegalOh no! Not copyright law! Anyways...
Void
Whatever is the number 14 in distrowatch
>>109173826Untreatable Colorectal Cancer
>>109174074Ubuntu is Ubuntu with a DE you knob. Mint is heavily modified.
>>109173826openSUSE Tumbleweed with KDE
>>109174058>immediately get defensive about a desktop>start projecting>it's an ESLevery time kek
>>109173826Alpine
>>109173826that's a very low bar
>>109173826windows 10 LTSC IoT edition
>>109174100genuinely, what difference is there in Ubuntu and Debian? Did the developers decide one day to make Ubuntu "kiddie mode" and that's why Debian is better?
>>109175925>No argumentsI accept your concession
>>109173826>not even one (1) reply saying archi'd say the mighty have fallen but in reality this board is full of poseurs and it's currently "uncool" to use arch. the answer is arch btw
debian sage
>>109173826Debian with KDE Plasma>>109177977One difference is Ubuntu's blurple theming is ugly
>>109173826cat distros-list.txt | grep -Pi "^(?!ubuntu)"
cat distros-list.txt | grep -Pi "^(?!ubuntu)"
>>109177998>I acce-*krashes*
>>109173826Fedora and it's not even a competition, hell, if you have time to craft an install script, arch linux is a gorillion times more stable than ubungu lts.Or for example, if you want a distro to last for years on a single install, instead of using the fork, you can go directly to debian which from my experience you can use for whole years without something ever breaking or misbehaving.
>>109173826Debian*drops mic*
>>109178521>One difference is Ubuntu's blurple theming is uglyThey need to return to tradition. Their original brown theme was actually nice, and iconic.
>>109173852Upgrade your computer. Find a cheap used laptop if you're too fucking poor.
>>109179122>arch linux is a gorillion times more stable than ubungu ltsBlatant lies. But I'm sure that's a popular opinion amongst high schoolers.>Consult the Wiki(tm)!
>>109173826nixos........
>>109173826fedora workstation
>>109173826Select * from distros where name <> "Ubuntu";
>>109173826Ubuntu LTS with the free extended security maintenance. Now your system is set for 10 years.>but muh updoooots!Fuck off.
>>109173826Ubuntu does too much experimental bullshit and renames packages (fucks with shell scripts). I wish Ubuntu was literally just Debian Sid with every package verified and set for a 6 month release schedule. The 6 month release schedule is the only correct way to handle computing. Rolling release is a cope for smaller projects.
