Should I learn C++?
Yes, it is the basis of every other language, and very necessary to understand the notion of object oriented programming.
>>109175459Definitely. There are still many state-of-the-art things you can do with C++ that AI will not be able to touch for at least a decade.
>>109175459Yes. Projects like llama.cpp are still written in C++ because it truly is the most powerful language.
>>109175459Nobody knows C++, they just write program with some subset of it.
>>109175459Just bee yourself
>>109175459c++ can be procedural or functional too.MFC faggotry almost made c++ most retarded sh1t in existence.trying to have rights over your program exe files viausing FRAME philosophy over reasoning you do a program in first place.say no to std::cin cout << >> operatorssay yes to std::string wstring c++17 or newer
>>109176287>wstringthat shit is broken even on windowsthe language purposedly omits unicode processing because unless you use something like libicu it's never going to get full unicode support.even modern languages like rust don't support unicode fully, there's no way to do surrogate conversions or grapheme clusterization, let alone normalization
>>109175459>coding manually Ewwwww that’s gross, just use ai, trans
>>109175477>>109175508>>109175801why use c++ when you can use lisp
>>109177976wider supportfastermore and higher quality resourcesall of these things are an order of magnitude difference if not greater
>>109178112he said why not use case (nobody actually uses lisp except for the 3 emacs users and 12 people making halo mods)
>>109175459No, nobody should learn C++.
>>109175477>it is the basis of every other languageIt's not.
No, everything is movong to rust.
>>109175508Like what?
>>109178445>t. roon
