[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • You may highlight syntax and preserve whitespace by using [code] tags.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: vengeance-weapon_97N.png (1.04 MB, 832x1216)
1.04 MB PNG
>bluetooth uses the same frequency as 2.4GHz Wi-Fi signals
what dumbass decided that was a good idea?
>>
Me. Sorry (not sorry).
>>
Why did they design 2.4GHz WiFi to use the same frequency as Bluetooth? Are they stupid?
>>
the same dumbass that decided the clock interrupt should have the same number as the double fault exception

also konata is absurdly kawaii
>>
My router uses dual-band WiFi and my capable devices are on 5GHz.
>>
>>109193839
>usb3 uses the same frequency as 2.4GHz signals
literally every usb3 device cable is a massive emi source that can drown out unfortunately positioned motherboard wireless antennae
>>
>>109193839
This image had better not be AI generated.
>>
>>109193839
Because that was the most appropriate of the ISM radio bands that could be used for consumer RF equipment at the time.
>>
File: file.png (1.96 MB, 1024x1024)
1.96 MB PNG
>>109194006
surely not
>>
>>109194059
On my computer I will only save man-made konatas, as I like to share in the beauty of such creations forged by the mind of the artist.
>>
>>109193839
Yes but also no.
Since Bluetooth 4 (maybe earlier) adaptive frequency hopping has been a thing. All modern bluetooth devices will automatically deconflict with any other ISM signals within the overall frequency range. The channels are only 1mhz each so there’s a lot of range there to play with (79 total channels).
There would have to be a ridiculous amount of 802.11 traffic split between all available 802.11 channels to interfere, and even then it would be totally transparent to the average user since adaptive frequency hopping kicks in faster than you can perceive the interference.
>>
>>109193839
>what dumbass decided that was a good idea?
leave him alone he can't even spell his own name correctly
>>
local star system has most noise at that band
>>
>>109194006
It obviously is. That floor design is too retarded to have been done by any human.
>>
Konata socks.
>>
>>109193839
and usb 3.0 interferes with 2.4 mouse dongles for some reason
>>
>>109193839
Doesn't matter neither signals are at exactly 2.4ghz, you know there is something called band width and channels.
>>
>>109194070
Sorry lad, its ai slop



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.