[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


ALL new European cars will have facial recognition tech inside the vehicle by 2027.

Make sure you're on your best behaviour and driving safely, citizens!
>>
>>109232397
>thinking OP is probably a faggot
>read some articles
>it's real
do EUfags really?
>>
>>109232397
the EU isn't going to be around long enough to reach peak totalitarian dystopia
>>
File: HARL2pVbIAIzQcg.jpg (132 KB, 1280x955)
132 KB JPG
>>109232405
>>
>>109232428
you'll die of heart failure before you make it to epstein's age amerifattoid lol
>>
File: ford new spy cars.png (197 KB, 780x1180)
197 KB PNG
>>109232409
Where are ya from?

It's coming to a vehicle near you.
>>
Muslims won't have this new law apply to them.
>>
>>109232397
Most new cars have this anyway? My car from 7 years ago has it.
I just turn it off.
>>
>>109232397
Where's the gnu car when we need them
>>
>>109232438
south korea, and yes i know, i am not safe from such fuckery
in fact, just yesterday they started some internet mass censoring
>>
i thank god every day for giving me two working legs
>>
File: yeeted.webm (1022 KB, 720x1274)
1022 KB
1022 KB WEBM
>>109232405
>People should just use the superior option (bike and train).
"Superior"
>>
Based. Fuck carfags.
>>
>>109232460
Make porn legal in South Korea. Softcore porn is so boring. I can't read my pornhwas either.
>>
>>109232450
>I just turn it off
This so much lol. It's like your iPhone or whatever. If you turn it off, it can't geotrack you or listen in to your conversations. A turned off phone is 100% off.
>>
>>109232504
lol, lmao even
they are going in the exact opposite direction
>>
>>109232397
my bicycle doesn't have this problem
>>
>>109232511
>A turned off phone is 100% off.
You're so naive it's kind of cute.
>>
>>109232692
wholesome autist cant detect sarcasm. how do i give reddit gold on 4chan?
>>
>>109232718
The line between genuine idiocy and detectable sarcasm is actually a negative overlap nowadays
>>
>get cut off by an individual with a high concentration of melanin
>possess low levels of melanin, so don't retaliate, but still agitated
>say "fucking nogs..."
>onboard computer picks up instance of hate speech
>shuts off vehicle, locks the doors, phones the police
>>
>>109232397
Oh shit better move to US
>Same law, mandatory by 2027 already in use by majority manufacturers
Wow, amazing thanks OP.
>>
>>109232511
>A turned off phone is 100% off.
for most intents and purposes, this is true
>>
>>109232409
why would you think this is fake? Have you been paying attention?
>>
File: driveby.jpg (47 KB, 580x346)
47 KB JPG
>>109232458
imagine sitting in your proprietary car that is disabled because it thought you were looking at your phone and then this guy drives by
>>
>>109232397
I assume this only applies to whites, right? If they apply it to all, it'll get repealed really quick.
>>
>>109232926
because it's fucking absurd?
>>
>>109232405
>>>/n/igger
>>
>>109232397
Good thing most automakers have replaced knobs on the dashboard with touchscreens, no need to take eyes off the road when I want to turn on the AC now… oh wait
>>
>>109232397
Most new cars already have this dumbass, at worst you'll hear a beep sound when you look away from the road from too long eg checking your phone, it's just a new safety sensor, I assure you no one cares to do anything with an infrared recording of your face unless they want to prove you were texting and driving after hitting a pedestrian, in which case it's good
>>
For my lifestyle, a shitty elontaxi is enough (actually, a bus stop is 3 minutes walk from here, so often not even that). Unless I start living on a farm, doing some living off duh land shit, I don't even want a vehicle. I've seen people waste insane amounts of time on their cars, especially old beaters, not interested.
>>
>>109232397
so what will it do if i am distracted, apply full brakes?
>>
>>109232397
All cars are required to have seat belts and yet a lot of people don't use those. Most Europeans drive cars that are 10+ years old anyway.

>>109232722
It was obvious sarcasm.

>>109232992
It's probably just an extra camera they can use to see who caused a car crash. So it won't really affect your driving.
>>
>>109232992
Broken Enrish-speaking Chinese woman voice recording will remind you to turn eyeballs towards incoming truck.
>>
This isn't really new. It's been like that for a while now.
>>
My shitbox is so old it doesn’t even complain when I don't use the seatbelt. Thank god
>>
>>109232397
>valuetainment
brown crypto jew
>>
This will never fly in the US. All it's going to take is a couple of niggers sucking their teeth and going DAT'S RAYCISS MOFUGGUH I DINDU NUFFIN SHEEEEIT NIGGA and it'll get walked back as soon as it disproportionately flags them "for no reason."
>>
>he owns a car built after 2010
My shitbox Corolla doesn't have any of this shit because I'm not a retard and I will drive it into the ground.
>>
>>109232450
You won't be able to turn it off and the car will pester you at best and refuse to operate at worst if it can't detect you.
>>
>>109232995
>All cars are required to have seat belts and yet a lot of people don't use those.
I refuse to believe people in 1st world countries are driving around without their seatbelts on
>>
>>109232397
hello expensive regulatory mandated ML infrared camera,
meet chewing gum
>>
>>109233231
meet remote vehicle shutoff
>>
>>109233269
by God, the car shall obey man always
>>
File: 1760858052625.jpg (31 KB, 563x370)
31 KB JPG
>>109232397
distraction detection = face recognition
>>
>>109233327
you won't do shit
>>
File: 1763255112501531.png (883 KB, 1280x961)
883 KB PNG
cars are bloat
>>
>>109232443
Full car features unlock when the smell sensors detect curry and body odor/
>>
Good. I don't want to be ran over by some retard that's more interested in their phone than the traffic while operating a multi ton death cage.
>>
>>109232957
>>109232816
kill yourself goycattle
>>
>>109233448
they will be let off with a warning anyway (because they're brown and you're not)
>>
>>109233141
It's extremely common in small towns or rural areas because people are mostly just visiting each other or going to a store. Why wear a seat belt in a 30-50 km/h zone where you'll drive less than 10 minutes and there's no police or cameras?

It's the same as dashboard lights/indicators. Most people don't give a shit about them for months until they have to actually service the car or renew the registration.
>>
Japanese cars have mandatory computer vision cameras that are linked to the brakes. It was introduced because old people kept plowing through groups of kindergarten kids but it mostly loves to completely fail in light rain and throw on the brakes for small branches hanging over the road
>>
>>109233472
Because hitting something even at 30 km/h yeets you to the steering wheel while it fires off an explosive load on your face. Some blind grandma t-bones you? Well you're flying around inside the car without a seatbelt. You don't wear the seatbelt for police or cameras. You wear it to save your fucking life.

And only retards ignore warning lights. Because ignoring them will always be more expensive than actually fixing them.

>>109233141
You'd think so but I just drove with an acquaintance last weekend and they didn't put on their seatbelt when we started driving.
>>
>>109232409
>Natural born citizens must drive ze speed limit
>Refugees can do whatever they want
>>
>>109232397
So how do I just pull the fuse to it and then spray flex seal over it?
>>
>>109233448
Why are you walking?
>>
>>109233529
Who says I'm walking? I don't want to be ran over or t-boned while on a bicycle, motorbike or in a car either by some retarded hoe looking at insta.
>>
>>109232460
>south korea

lel, south korea was a dictatorship most of its existence (until 1988). surprisingly, most people in the world don't know that. now the country is under the rule of Chaebols; Samsung alone is counting for 20% of SK's gdp. You guys should not talk about anything freedom.
>>
>>109233543
Lol a bicycle. You just gotta buy a big truck. This is an arms race.
>>
>>109233506
Stop derailing the thread with your nonsensical shit. All these surveillance items are a threat because there WILL be backdoors for spooks. That's a bigger issue than imaginary scenarios.
>>
>>109233557
A big truck costs 50-80% more than it used to cost 20 years ago and for what, a big engine you don’t need?
>>
>>109233562
Oy vey spooks you say
>>
>>109233564
Make more money and take physics 101
More mass = better4u
>>
>>109233486
>hitting something even at 30 km/h yeets you to the steering wheel while it fires off an explosive load on your face
30-35 is still a very safe speed even if you get slammed into a wall, seat belt or not.
>You don't wear the seatbelt for police or cameras.
That's the only reason most people wear seat belts.
>You wear it to save your fucking life.
It's extremely situational. A lot of times seat belts just turn your car into a death trap rather than saving your life.
>you're flying around inside the car
There's significantly less high-speed traffic accidents in small towns and rural areas. Most people don't care about wearing a seat belt to increase their odds of survival by less than 5% just for the 0.001% chance they participate in a severe traffic accident.
>ignoring them will always be more expensive than actually fixing them.
That's just your opinion.
>>
>>109233598
Yes you'll most likely survive a low speed crash. But I don't want the injuries that come with it either. And you can get real injuries from airbags deploying if you're not wearing a seatbelt because they're designed to work with a seatbelt, not when your face is on the dash or the steering wheel.

Most people aren't retards that wear seatbelts only because of police. Most people wear them for safety. This might be a difficult concept to understand for a room temp IQ nigger that can't think 15 minutes into the future tho.

The only reason there's less accidents in rural areas is because there's less traffic.
>>
>>109232409
Following their communist leaders in the US who implemented this over a year ago already. Try to keep up.
>>
>>109233616
>I don't want the injuries that come with it either.
You will get injuries even if you wear a seat belt.
>Most people aren't retards that wear seatbelts only because of police.
That is, in fact, wrong.
>The only reason there's less accidents in rural areas is because there's less traffic.
This doesn't contradict what I'm saying. In fact, that's exactly what I'm saying. There's less traffic and there's less high speed traffic, so there are pretty much no fatal or serious accidents. And because of that, many people don't wear seat belts since there's no reason to.
It's the same as quickly going to a different parking spot within 100m. Most people don't put a seat belt for that because you're moving at 3-15km/h and there's no risk of injury even if someone moving at 15km/h hits you head on.
>>
>>109233482
Those are different, and they're present in a bunch of cars, not just Japanese ones. They monitor the environment in front of the car to avoid collisions. Not that face of the fucking driver.
>>
>>109232458
Why would an ungoyed car ever be granted access on the road?
>>
>>109233064
Did it stop every phone from being wiretapped?
>>
>>109233680
I really enjoy this feature on my subaru, distance monitoring cruise control rules. Reduces driving fatigue on long distance drives a ton
>>
>>109232957
None of this justifies being watched constantly. Stop fucking defending it. Imagine a cow arguing for more electric fencing. Or are you perhaps the (farmer)?
>>
Gee I wonder why everything is so expensive. EU's got their priorities straight.
>>
>>109233685
The wheels turn, so it can easily be on the road. I don't see the confusion.
>>
>>109232458
Honestly an open source car is the only thing that would make me switch to electric
>>
>>109232397
Fake news.
>>
>>109234245
It's to protect the k***, you fucking p***
>>
Reminder that you have no expectation of privacy in a public space. Your vehicle is operated on public roads.
>>
>>109232992
Many new cars already have this
It basically starts beeping and ringing and screaming at you at max volume the moment your eyes are anywhere but straight ahead
>but won't this actually cause crashes?
Yes, it will. It itself is extremely distracting, ironically enough. The entire concept is completely idiotic when you stop to think about it for more than a second, but when has that stopped anyone? Same goes for most other driver AIDS, like lane assist
>>
>>109232397
What’s stopping a European version of me from just taping over the camera?
>>
>>109232949
>Anon finally learns about clownworld
We live in silly times.
>>
>>109234278
An open source car is the only thing that would make me get a driver's license.
>>
>>109234525
Are you white or Asian (Japanese/Chinese/Korean)? Straight to jail and yes they will enforce this.
Are you a nigger? Nothing.
>>
>>109234525
The car's refusal to start or be put in gear and/or it unceasingly screaming at you until it can detect you.
>>
>>109233668
Whatever whiplash and bruised ribcage that might be caused by the seatbelt is infinitely preferable to your head impacting the windshield at 50mph
>>
>>109232397
hopefully this stops dangerous jewish girls texting and driving, and hopefully this annoys the fuck out of the uber drivers who have 3 phones in front of them with which they constantly interact and drive slowly as a result, thats all i want out of this, this should be mandatory for women and uber drivers, all normal people do not need this
>>
>>109232438
>patenting something *this* simple
do mutts really?
>>
>>109232397
>your car will constantly make basedjaks of you
>>
>>109234572
The windshield is weak enough in many car models that it can be breached from the inside, causing minimal to no damage while ejecting you to safety.
>>
>>109234787
Even if it can be broken fairly easily, do you have any idea what such impact will do to your skull, brain and spine?
>>
>>109232397
America too. It's buried deep in an infrastructure bill and nobody talked about it until years after it passed. Either you drive an old 1990s or 2000s clunker or you don't.
>>
>>109235140
>do you have any idea what such impact will do to your skull, brain and spine?
Yes, nothing. I know 3 people who got shot out of a windshield and none of them got hurt at all aside from some scratches and bleeding. No permanent damage was caused. One of them said he'll never wear a seat belt in his life since the only reason he survived the car crash is because he wasn't wearing one.
>>
>>109232397
>making sure people are acting responsibly in dangerous vehicles is bad... just because!
No, I expect other transportation operators to be monitored for safety, but cars and poor drivers kill way more people each year.

And reading a cover of the specs, it doesn't sound privacy invading:
https://www.gadgetreview.com/all-new-eu-cars-require-a-camera-aimed-at-your-face-where-that-data-goes-is-still-anyones-guess
>The regulation requires ADDW data to stay inside the vehicle. Specifically:
> - Processing must happen in a “closed loop” — no transmission to third parties
> - Facial recognition and biometric identification are explicitly banned
> - Data must be “immediately deleted after processing”
> - No fixed retention window is defined — the regulation leaves this open
> - No independent EU-wide audit mechanism exists to verify compliance
Though, there should be an audit mechanism to ensure companies respect privacy.
>>
>>109235274
You can also survive getting tombstoned without any immediately obvious injuries, that doesn't mean it's not bad for you.
And I sincerely doubt the "he'd die if he wore a seatbelt" thing
>>
>>109232538
>>109232460
whats happening in SK?
>>
>>109232816
yeah, I bought my car earlier this year and it already has this feature
seems pretty useful, though I'm usually too stressed to fall asleep at the wheel, but it's apparently very common
>>
>>109235380
>And I sincerely doubt the "he'd die if he wore a seatbelt" thing
The car got completely wrecked and crushed while he was totally fine. Even the cops said he was lucky he broke the law rather than his life.
Believe whatever you want.
>>
Only the most retarded normies would buy a new car to impress females or algo. They are worse in every way compared to a car made before 2010
>>
>>109235459
if you're knowledgeable about cars, or have someone you can trust who is, sure. a simple japanese car in good condition is probably gonna keep running until oil runs dry or it becomes illegal
but it's a huge gamble for most people
>>
>>109235490
I don't think I know a single person who buys cars new. Maybe 3 out of 150+ people I know ever bought a new car. From my experience people generally buy used 2008-2016 cars. So I don't really see how it's a gamble.
I mean, buying a new car is a gamble these days considering the baggage they come with and the expenses you'll have during maintenance and repair.
>>
>>109234132
False analogy.
Cows don't happen to accidentally kill each other when distracted when walking (at least where I'm from).
Imagine not advocating for more protection on the road from idiots because you are afraid of an infrared sensor making sure your eyes are on the road.
>>
>>109235274
>I know 3 people who got shot out of a windshield
this nigga lives in the flatout universe
>>
>buy stick shift car
>none of the driver assist features are enabled
who knows how long this loophole will last but I love my 2024 car with no lane assist, driver distraction detection, or idle engine stop
>>
>>109232438
Ford patents a ton of dystopian shit but they never make any of it. They obviously do this to pad out their pattent portfolio and troll if they ever get the chance.
>>
>>109233064
>/pol/toddler with no real world experience fabricates some retarded scenario that won't ever happen
>>
>>109235575
Well, that's not too far off considering I live in one of the highest "road accident per capita" countries in EU. I'm just old enough to know a ton of people who got into car accidents and I know a lot of mechanics, doctors and policemen who are exposed to them a lot.
>>
So what is the big complain about this new technology exactly? As far as I know is to prevent irresponsible people driving drunk, high or with lack of sleep.
>>
>>109235652
Based Ford, an American company, protecting us, in case any other auto company tries to do mass surveillance. Ford is going to rescue Europeans by making it illegal for European cars to spy on their citizens, because it would infringe on their mass surveillance patent.
>>
>>109234620
Read >>109235652
Ford is going to SAVE the word with their mass surveillance patents. Ford is patenting them so others can't use it. Watch as Ford save Europeans by getting this pulled out of European cars.
>>
>>109235623
Aren't they phasing out the idle start/stop in '27 models because so many people complained about it?
>>
>>109235743
The data is stored and sent to who-knows-where to be sold to who-knows-who. It's nanny state bullshit.
>>
>>109235757
That's not what's happening. Employees probably get bonuses for every pattent they successfully get so there's an incentive to crank them out. From Ford's perspective, patents are cheap compared to R&D. If they every strike gold they can either monopolize the idea for years, make a ton of money on licenses, or sell the pattent if someone else wants it. If some regulation happens to mandate technology they pattented, all the better. There is no altrustism on Ford's part, but it does have the unintended side-effect of blocking other automakers from implenting this stuff.
>>
>China is living in the future! Their society is healthier, they have free housing, their industry is booming
>yeah but they spy on you
>so let's implement all the spying and none of the good things
Thank you EU, truly
>>
File: carlos.jpg (107 KB, 1920x1080)
107 KB JPG
>>109232397
more regulatory market capture? for big german auto and the german component suppliers? from the EU? shocking
>>
>>109235846
The data is all local and only stored for a limited time. There's no internet connectivity there. It will be used in the case of traffic accidents to more confidently determine who is guilty.
>>
>>109232397
i'm tired man, i wanted none of this.

Let me in lord, i am not your fighter
>>
>>109232397
>>
Wanted to make my own thread but will ask here. I'm having to buy a car manufactured at least from 2018 or later. I know it will have telemetry in it. I discovered that you can simply remove a TCU from a car and the worst that seems to cause is losing the ability you do emergency calls and GPS systems if you had such services subscribed to you, which I do not. Is there any downside to removing a TCU beyond what I understand? Will removing the TCU be enough to keep my data private and secure from the manufacturer looking to sell off my info?
>>
>>109232397
fake news with dozens and dozens of replies
welcome to /g/ retardation filled with russian bots
>>
>>109233756
Rem...
>>
>>109232450
>I just turn it off.
Car quite literally won't start unless it's on
>>
>>109236350
lol
lmao
I wish I was still this naive
>>
>>109235376
>Facial recognition and biometric identification are explicitly banned
>No fixed retention window is defined — the regulation leaves this open
So every company will keep your data forever and use another name for "Facial recognition and biometric identification" to get around that
>No independent EU-wide audit mechanism exists to verify compliance
Or they won't even bother since nobody will be watching them regardless

But keep applauding your privacy getting stripped away, retard.
>>
>>109235846
So basically as every other thing on the internet? And what are they going to do with millions of videos of random unimportant people faces driving?
>>
>>109236461
That's what I read somewhere. Even if it's not the case, how exactly are they going to connect it to the internet? I'm not a driver so I have no idea how new cars work. My understanding was that you'd need to give them a mobile hotspot or something.
>>
>>109232397
>ALL new European cars
Not my problem.
>>
>>109236890
>Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me
You are a sad dog.
>>
>>109236948
HAUUUUUU :DDDD
>>
>>109232397
What happens if you tape over the camera? Instant gang-rape by refugees?
>>109232929
>you will never have a vehicle powered by FOSS
Thanks for making me sad, jerk.
>>
>>109236890
>soon they add extra taxes for old cars under the guise of them being bad for the environment
>>
>>109232992
Deploys takata airbag
>>
if it's to protect our children, then it is just and necessary
>>
>>109232409
Yes, but don't think this is exclusive to the EU. America passed a similar law recently.
You will live under constant scrutiny. You will own nothing, and you will be happy.
>>
>>109236350
Do you honesty believe that?
>>
>>109236548
It's what they claim will be the case, but there is no agency that will inspect this
What will happen is that they'll make bank off the data, some autist will figure it out, they get slapped with a fine 1/10th of the profit and then continue totally not doing it
I honestly wish we grew a fucking pair and nuked these giant companies (including tech companies like Apple, Google etc) with something ridiculous, like a milly per every single individual infraction so that it actually adds up to something substantial
>>
File: 1782856264846491.jpg (15 KB, 400x225)
15 KB JPG
>>109232397
https://files.catbox.moe/xgdt2m.mp4

There is literally NOTHING wrong with putting cameras everywhere. Only bad and evil people are afraid because they will get caught. If you've got nothing to hide, then you've got nothing to fear. Yes, there may be data breaches or shit like that, but it's for the greater good.
>>
>>109236548
cars come with cell data antennas now anon
for bandwidth reasons I doubt they currently stream video, but the mechanism is already in place
yes you can and probably should disable them
>>
>>109237683
[-]
>>
>>109237683
Do you shit with the door open
>>
>>109232397
good thing I ride a bike(scicle)
but god damn that's some cuckery.
it costs 3000 euros and like half year of classes for a driving license anyway, can't be bothered.
>>
>>109237853
Do you shit with your clothes on?
>>
File: 7865674.jpg (138 KB, 468x309)
138 KB JPG
>>109232473
>>
>>109237683
kill yourself
>>
>>109233486
You honestly sound like you're 16 and just started driving. There's like hundreds of non important shit that can trigger warning lights. A small leak in your exhaust can trigger them and can be ignored for like 20 years. Also in case you aren't aware, boomers and especially their parents were all functional alcoholics, they drove back and forth to work, and worked wasted out of their minds, no seat-belts and there were very few accidents, many have perfect driving records to this day. My father, uncle and grandfather were all like this.

The problem today, is people just don't pay attention to the road, they're off in space or on their phone and just not even looking, or they're so low IQ they literally do not understand basic physics like stopping distance, relative speed, how to turn their vehicle, spatial awareness etc. Doesn't help we're importing millions of people from countries where the most driving experience they get is electric scooters on dirt roads. There's no solution to modern drivers, they're just fucking retarded which is prob why the gov wants to just phase them out entirely and replace them with AI.
>>
>>109232995
People that do not use seat belts are genuinely clinically retarded
>>
>>109232397
>oh no yuropoors, you are cucks, kek, not like we all, apple would never do this kind of control shit to us, this is the lard of the free
>>
>>109233668
You clearly have not seen enough bodycam compilations where the only one seriously injured was the person not wearing a seatbelt.
I'd love to hear the counter-reason for clicking the thing in, it opens fine in a crash, mych better than say your door and you don't leave that open
>>
>>109238210
Sometimes. Sometimes I shit naked.
>>
>>109232478
Fuck cityfags. The government owns you. You cannot leave without permission.
>>
>>109238534
>Also in case you aren't aware, boomers and especially their parents were all functional alcoholics, they drove back and forth to work, and worked wasted out of their minds, no seat-belts and there were very few accidents, many have perfect driving records to this day. My father, uncle and grandfather were all like this.
thats because they're all white men and the majority of drivers (90%+) in the west were white males for years, we're objectively the best drivers alive, of course there were less crashes.
>>
>>109232409
they also pay like 5 grand a year for insurance
>>
>>109232428
It's true though. Nissan niggers ruin everything. Biking is superior
>>
>>109232397
why was >>109232405 deleted? that anon was right, cars are fucking retarded. if we assume there is no malice behind this, the most likely reason for these measures is that any retard can drive a car. then it's no wonder politicians want cars to monitor drivers...
not that I condone this shit, though. we know what this tech will actually be used for, and who will use it (glowies).
>>
another win for /r/fuckcars
>>
>>109232397
>>109232458
>>109233685
>>109234278
you guys know that you can DIY your own ICE to EV car, right? there are a bunch of videos on yt of people converting their cars and explaining how to do it.
batteries are kinda expensive though. $6-10k each.
>>
>>109232397
>chud laser eyes
>>
>>109232992

forget that seat heaters are monthly subscription and reach for a button in mid console manage to apply emergency brake and twinclutch assebly shits itself
>>
File: e64292863462379.jpg (297 KB, 643x1049)
297 KB JPG
>>109237231
>>
>>109232397
How is this new btw? My mom's 2025 Clio has a camera in the center hub, which checks the driver's eyes and warns when you are not looking at the road.
>>
>>109232425
you just wait
>>
>>109238831
>the government owns you
>meanwhile, carfags have to pay registration insurance tax & tip and still have to pull over if a government official demands it
>>
we will certainly end up registering every single computing device over some random amount of flops...
>>
File: tape.png (175 KB, 597x600)
175 KB PNG
Everyone in this thread is ignoring the obvious.
>but muh car won't start
>but muh annoying beeping
>but muh phone home spy tech
So research whether or not this shit can be disabled on that make/model and if it can't then don't fucking buy it. There WILL be models out there that don't integrate this shit in to the point it causes the car not to work. Right now there are makes and models of cars where you CAN disable those built in modems that phone home with a simple fuse pull and the car still works fine. Just don't buy the ones that shit the bed if it can't connect or the "Eye Spy™" bullshit can't be physically disabled. You're over thinking it.
>>
File: 632fb2b8_medium.jpg (164 KB, 900x599)
164 KB JPG
>>109232397
The antichrist doesn't stop. Now its the time for the open source car!
>>
>>109240333
car won't start if it breaks? how the fuck does that work?

most cars can barely keep an air con going for 10 years. these will all be paperweights in a decade.
>>
>>109232397
AI monitoring the camera learns to lip read - detects when you say bad thing about government or immigration

'Open the pod bay doors, Hal'
'I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that'
>>
>>109240355
it'll have a microphone
>>
>>109240346
In some cars these systems are so integrated into the basic functions of the vehicle that if there is no internet connection the car legit won't start. This is most common in EVs, but these systems are making their way into ICE vehicles.
Another example is modern Ford F-150s. It has a built in digital governor that if you try to by pass the entire dashboard and touch screen in the center console breaks. This means the speedometer no longer works and you can no longer turn on your AC/heater. Yes, you can exceed 90mph now, but you still have no clue how much gas you have, no idea how fast you're going, your radio doesn't work (no way to turn it on) and ALL of the warning lights stay lit until you re-enable the governor. Ask me how I know.
>>
>>109240346
Congrats, you've discovered the reason car makers probably told lawmakers that this was a fine idea. Prices up, durability down. Yet another thinly disguised way to milk more money from all of us.
>>
ITT: bad drivers who don't want to get caught

I would unironically approve of the EU putting cameras in the houses of people who drive like shit, or endanger people's lives in general.
>>
true freedom
>>
>>109240578
This, but unironically. EU people need to be under surveillance 24/7, so there wouldn't be any law breaking or preparation for any terror attack. I'd just suggest that ANY EU citizen MUST wear a camera and a GPS locator and if some of these go offline the police should check on the individual. The camera must also record the time interval, when the online connection was dropped, so there are no "blind spots" in the recordings, and this is crucial.
>>
>>109240578
>I would unironically approve of the EU putting cameras in the houses of people who drive like shit, or endanger people's lives in general.


cameras in every home ARE coming, for the safety of children, women and to protect you against yourself too
>>
>>109240662
What are you talking about? They are not coming, they are already there and you buy them voluntarily.
>>
>>109240608
just force them to have a smartphone with them all the time and you got everything covered

oh wait, thats already done
>>
>>109240675
no cameras or smartphones in my home
>>
>>109240681
based, tin foil hat status?
>>
>>109240711
I don't literally wear a tin foil hat, but I'm kinda paranoid. My laptop has no physical microphone, no physical camera, no wifi module, and it has no intel management engine, I also don't have a dumb cell phone. In very rare occasions where I need a phone, I use an IP phone, which is disconnected and stored away the rest of te year
>>
File: masking-tape.jpg (172 KB, 1717x2000)
172 KB JPG
>>109232397
>Big Brother HATES that one simple trick
>>
>>109240681
I wish I thought about this before getting married. Now I need to make my wife gtfo because she is addicted to using phones and I'm sure it's spying on me with the camera and mic
>>
>>109232397
But mine already has it, it started warning me when I was about to fall asleep
>>
This isn't new. There are already cars on the road with dash-facing cameras that warn you if you look away from the road for too long while in motion. There are already cars with 360 degree cameras that can project an "above the car" image to assist with parking.
>>
File: 1766136023841804.jpg (673 KB, 1024x681)
673 KB JPG
The moment they don't let me drive old cars anymore I'll just buy a motorbike
>>
Based. Total car nigger death. People should just use the superior option (bike and train).
>>
>>109233442
Litre bikes are bloat. Get a 125cc. Better yet a 50cc moped. Costs you a tenner to top up and ride a few hundred miles.
>>
>>109232397
>>109232438

Will the Epstein class have these in their cars?
>>
>>109241925
>2 names and a surname
That's a strong jew signal, right?
>>
>>109241925
Of course, for their private driver.

These policies never affect the ruling class. Remember that.
>>
>>109241155
>ZXR750
Supremely based.
With $3000 and a helmet you'll smoke any cager save for V12 supercars.
>>
>>109240732
I've thought it was a peeled banana for a sec
>>
>>109232425
I hope so. Please nuke us.
>>
>>109242405
This
C'mon Vlad do something funny



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.