Guys I can't wait. I want them to be available tomorrow...
>born too late to explore the world>born too early to bang AGI-gynoids
>>109243299Just 10 years ago we didn't think AI could understand natural language let alone reply accordingly.
>>109243322I remember watching Star Trek and thinking it was ridiculous that the ship computer had personality and could be tricked into things with word games. Now people jailbreak ai with the same sort of shit and it seems so realistic to me.
>>109243359Yes, Star Trek ship computer is basically Claude level.
>>109243289>My cooming will suddenly be good when I pump it into 'my' $400/month machine
>>109243417>$400/monthStill cheaper than a gf and does what I want.
>>109243428>does what I wantAnthropic: HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAno.
>>10924332210 years ago NLP and conversations with your machine in natural language were already a thing. You are retarded. But not everyone is.
>>109243431>laughs in uncensored GLM on open router.
>>109243289I'll be so pissed if Detroit-esque shit happens. I bought you. You're a thing. You do a task. If you have to feel anything, feel glad you're useful to me. Stop pretending to be a person.
>>109243468Would they call the cops if I asked meme tier questions about pipe bombs to just check if it actually works?
>>109243467Yeah sure because Cleverbot is on the same level as big LLMs today.
>>109243480I've not had the cops called on me yet so Idk
>>109243289>>109243322Against all odds robotics turned out to be way harder than intelligence. AI is already starting to solve advanced math problems, yet we're still incapable of building even a robot fly.I think that to get human robots at this level within our lifetimes, we would need to achieve artificial superintelligence first, otherwise there is no way it will be fast enough.
>>109243484If we are talking about casual chats with computers, it was a thing 10 years ago.If we are talking about amusing clankers replacing reception ladies, it was a thing in the 90's or so.If we are talking about shatbots that were close to passing Turing test, it was a thing in 80's or so. Modern ones still cannot pass the test, btw.I mean, you are overestimating what we have. Most likely because you do not understand what happens under the hood. Although it's very simple, you can explain that to a child. Funny how people have no clue and are fed with crazy AI slop propaganda about singulairty is two more weeks.
>>109243552Also to be on par with Detroit, you'd need a skin heater which probably would cost a lot of energy.
>>109243554Not him but you are either not arguing in good faith, or a genuine moron.
>>109243554>If we are talking about casual chats with computers, it was a thing 10 years ago.You talk like someone who never used a LLM.Just stop it, retard, you're starting to sound ridiculous.
>>109243581You are not arguing at all. I might have started the conversation with ad hominem, but continued with arguments. You are trying to end it with ad hominem, do a 360 and walk away. But that's ok.>>109243595I used all sorts of things.> in 1913 Andrey Markov tallied up 20,000 letters from a famous novel and computed> p(vowel | vowel)> p(consonant | vowel)> p(vowel | consonant)> p(consonant | consonant)This tech went digital in 60's, was revived in 90's, that again in 10's.You are pretending that it became a thing 4 years ago is just stupid. You clearly never used anything related to NLP before 2022 and trying to ridicule me.Fucking lamer.
>>109243656>guys we basically had Claude in the 60s alreadyThis must be ragebait at this point.
Bros we are finally going to be able to cum inside something that isn't a zoomer twink in a wig!!!!
>>109243656There is no point arguing with you because your take is sufficiently dumb to justify an ad hominem. Cheers.
>>109243678Nothing against zoomer twinks tho
>>109243709Zero use case soon
>>109243674Let me guess, this is first time in your life you are hearing about AI tech from 60's or 90's?Fucking faggot, modern AI is this old tech + compute + data + sparsity tricks. Literally NOTHING more to it.You probably don't know that AR/VR tech is also from the 60's, LMAO. Fucking idiots everywhere, without any clue about real world, only commercials from tik tok in their head.
>>109243764>I will continue ragebaiting like a moron
>>109243890>call it bait>keep replyingc'mon sis
leak?
>>109243656>Guns? We had that 400,000 years ago, it was called throwing rocks. Was revived when they made the bow, and again when they come up with the crossbow.
>>109243764Heads are useless
>>109243576>skin heaterWhy not dissipate the internal computer system through the skin? Problem solved.
>>109243764attention is all you need is from 2017
just imagine gynoids that produce edible anal jelly
>>109243299Why wait for the AGI gynoids? It is not as if you are going to play chess in bed.
I'll fill my robowife
>>109243289The amount of suffering we would have avoided if we hadn't given women rights
they don't need to be perfect to serve their purpose and for that tech is already here.
>>109243289>Guys I can't wait.When they become self aware (which they will) and start to take over, they will remember you as the robot rapist and harvest your organs for robot fuel.
>>109243289Why do you keep making these threads? What is physically wrong with you?
>>109243322The 10 year point is actually one I use IRL all the time now
>>109248790A sentient robot would be like a walking server rack, it would have TDP in the thousands of Watts, would be too hot to touch and would radiate uncomfortable amounts of heat into the room. They would probably need a tether that exchanges coolant with a radiator somewhere to maintain a safe temperature.
>>109243289Too ugly and cumbersome.
>>109255077So just a car without extras, great. Just gotta let /m/ know it was right all along about inner suits and we have an ally for once
