>/g/ used to make fun of me for buying 32gb of ramGuess who's laughing now?
>>109249008buying used 32gb for $80 5 years ago was a masterful plan from yours truly
Site just always lives its crabs in a bucket mentality. ALWAYS. Never forget that.
>>109249008>Only 32
>>109249008I bought 32gb new when it was cheap. Now I regret not buying 64gb back then.
>>109249008I got 64GB when I upgraded to DDR5, it's been a good decision since I've been able to do everything I wanted with no concern for RAM. Home server ended up with 64GB DDR4 scrounged up from a couple of different kits too.
You don't look like that though
>>109249008When computer parts are cheap, you buy them, end of story. /g/ told me hdds were useless garbage when 12tb were sub 200 bucks. Imagine listening to /g/ ever about anything. Permanent peasant class mindset here.
>>109249877This is why you don't take advice from strangers on internet who doesn't know shit about you
just dumpster dive. most kits are underclocked, I have several systems with essentially free DDR4 3600 MT/s RAM even though they're rated lower. Just werks.
>>109249008It was obvious years ago that 32GB had become the new 16GB, i.e. the bare minimum. Anybody who didn't have at least 32GB prior to the memory crisis is either a poorfag or retarded.
>>109249008>Guess who's laughing now?Same, averi-senpai. I wish I bought 64, actually.
