why did they make wifi and bluetooth the same frequency?
You can use 5 GHz (and 6 GHz on WiFi 6E and WiFi 7).
>>109258443You didn't answer OP's question. Are you retarded?
>>109258381because 2.4-2.5 is an unlicensed band and you can transmit as much as you want. 915/868 licensing is a pain in the ass and very limiting. 5GHz range is shit. they are using multiple channels and frequency hopping so they are not on the same frequency
>>109258381Radio frequencies are used for a lot of things, but the spectrum is limited, so you can't just broadcast whatever frequency you want with however much power you want.
>>109258381Frequency licensing is a nightmare (in the US, the EU, and if I had to guess the rest of the developed world as well).No one wants a technology that won't be adapted due to regulatory hell.That's why both the BT & WiFi committees both chose 2.4 back in the day.
>>109258381>bluetoothIs possible create a social-network using the bluetooth? Like a IRC, but not being one. I'm searched for it and i found the Bitchat, i want an alternative for telegram and other digital message systems. Is the Bitchat good? What are your opinions?
>unlicensed How do you license part of the electromagnetic spectrum?
>>109258882You license it with needed technicalities. If everyone transmits how they want what they want, any form of radio communication becomes a mess. That's why you need to regulate how and why.
>>109258570>you can't just broadcast whatever frequency you want with however much power you want.You can there's technically nothing capable of stopping you at least until someone inevitable catches you and sends some three letter agency on your ass depending on what you're disrupting.
>>109258956>you can't do illegal things >nuh-un you can, until you get caught!No shit
>>109258942>any form of radio communication becomes a mess2.4 GHz wifi is already a mess
>>109258381is swapping frequency stuff around 2.45GHz microwave oven be 2.4GHz but faraday cage
>>109258942libertariansisters, our response?
>>109258505why do you need range for Bluetooth? why do I not see anyone marketing Bluetooth repeaters? why are you such a faggot?
>>109258570did you know x-ray and visible light for lasers are regulated by the FDA and not the FCC?
>>109260868>just place a bluetooth repeater in your pants so your earbuds with 5x5mm antenna and 40mAh battery can use 5ghz for some reasonyou are the blackest, dumbest gorilla nigger. stick to webdev and leave RF design to people with actual brains
>>109258381only certain bands are legally assigned for such purposes. also keep in mind 2.4ghz isn't just precisely 2400mhz, there's a range of frequencies near 2.4ghz that is split into about a dozen channels, so multiple things can use it without interference
>>109258381Cause 10x more brain damaged by squaring it
