What went wrong?
>Use this new chat thing, it's secure>Wasn't it made on 4chan? Eww are you a pedophile?
>Use this new chat thing, it's secure>Wasn't it made by a /g/tard? Eww are you a fucking retard?
>>109258770logo wasn't good enoughsad, many such casesit didn't help that a crypto audit that identified some minor issues was marketed as "ZOMG TOX IS INSECURE"
who the fuck starts a convo by sending someone cpthat's why it failed
>>109258770pedos
>>109258770not being the God Protocol that obsoletes IRC/XMPP/Mumble/Ventrilo/Skype-pre-6/Matrix/Discord/Slack
>>109258770Horrible marketing. Even on the DN you hear people saying that tox is too unknown. The network effect sadly is very strong
>>109258770it's almost useableteleguard probably has more users even though its just spyware (disguised as encrypted chat) spammed by bots on /soc/. probably ran by actual feds as some sort of espionage and entrapments
>>109258770Never used it but it has the best logo of any /g/ project