Why is there no standards for people to understand what they're employing AI to do for them? Is that just down to bad management who just want results without regard for quality of work?
>>109282236how does ai fumble text so badly. it's all over the place lol sizes, placement, rotations.
>>109282236What? It is on the worker to demonstrate work. End of story. Managers cannot—and should not—dictate every little detail for every tool a worker uses. Face it—AI is the future and you're too retarded to take advantage of it. You—and your ilk—will become extinct: leave this world for those of us who can continue into the future.
>>109282279You are REFUSING to do a better job here. This attitude is basically "whatever I prompt is good enough". Why can't you be bothered to take your prompted image and touch it up and FIX THE FUCKING ERRORS before you post it up like you're proud of yourself?
>>109282236I love my AI cummies~
>>109282236I have pretty good writing skills but can't really draw. I feel like using ai to write for you is worse than using ai to draw for you. Drawing well won't help you get a job unless the job is drawing, but writing well helps you do everything since reading well is integral to writing well.
>>109282236I'm genuinely confused about what you're asking.
>>109282447More importantly writing education is near universally free compulsory and low investment to practice.
>>109282447On the other hand I think AI writing is also much more feasible for anyone to refine and polish. We all know how to write words and understand what makes coherent phrasing. Not everyone knows how to improve the shading of a scene or correct the coloration of a picture.
>>109282451As a standard of creation I feel like using AI for productivity will spiral towards a future where the people who are hired to use AI to create things aren't actually able to do anything more than generate what they're being tasked to create. Be it music, pictures, or video they prompt something that reasonably fits the brief but there will be no ability on their part to then apply human skills in the areas they're working in to improve what was created and reflect a high quality of production. It's just "whatever comes out will suffice" because they're not going to have the talents to do something better beyond what they generated.The standard for what will be accepted for production-quality generated AI content will not rely on any talents the people generating it have in that medium. It only relies and sets expectations on their competency at generating things using AI.
>>109282499AI is literally worthless and it can't be copyrighted. You also don't need "workers" to prompt shit, even for a full scale ai show or a movie you need AT MOST 3 people including the producer. Now take your pills, masturbate and leave the board
Are you 100% certain the people mad about AI are just salty artists who are being exposed?
