[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


When the fuck are they going to invent directional audio for phones?
>>
>>109330584
directional speakers need to move more air than regular speakers.
that is achieved either by having a larger membrane surface, or increasing the membrane vibration amplitude.

the later is what all phones do, because they're space limited. the problem is that you get huge distortion and very low yields because oscillating at higher amplitudes requires more energy (per db created), while also making the membrane have more inertia (hence the distortion).

we already have 'directional' sound. for instance high frequencies/ultrasound are directional by nature. but for bass/mediums it's extremely difficult.

the solution that's been found is to only emit in the ultrasound, then when the sound bounce off a surface, the reflected wave interferes with the incoming wave, and these interference are the audible frequencies you hear. because ultrasound naturally travel in a straight line, you can achieve directional sound in all frequencies. that is in theory, because in practice all of these systems have low yields and high distortions.
>>
>>109330623
This guy's kinda retarded, but he's on the right track. The closest technology we have to a "directional" speaker is a phased array. Basically a bunch of tiny speakers in a grid, which work together so that they constructively interfere along a narrow beam, and destructively interfere everywhere else. They're not perfect, and you do get some noise in all other directions too, but the main reason they're not widely used is that they're big, expensive, and complicated to implement, for very little practical benefit under most circumstances.
>>
>>109330584
Only third worlders concern themselves with speakers. First worlders use their gold plated copper wire headphones for that. Meaning, you are a third worlder, OP.
>>
They should make 3D audio like they have 3D screens
Why aren't there any 3D phones?
>>
>>109330584
say directional speakers available on phone, then how do you hear phone's ring, phone's notification, etc.?
>>
>>109331395
You know damn well Brownoids play loud TikTokslop on public transport in every Western country.
>>
File: 1773569551750538.png (2 MB, 1295x1376)
2 MB PNG
Zoomers clearly don't give a fuck about annoying other people with they mindless chatter
>>
>>109330584
They already did. It's called a tweeter.
>>
>>109330584
Phone-sized aperture too small realtive to sound wavelength to form a decent beam or whatever other shape you want.
>>
>>109330584
Existed as long as bluetooth and headphone jacks. Connect phone to a real sound system to hear what music actually sounds like.
>>
>>109331511
>3D audio
Have you never heard of 5.1 surround sound? The band Yes even released an album specifically mixed for 5.1.
>>
>>109331559
with a brainchip of course
>>
>>109330584
>this guy wants to bring back "ur holding it wrong" part deux



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.