[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: confused_anime_girl.png (201 KB, 487x492)
201 KB PNG
How is it possible to learn programming without ai when ai is the one that tells you what to do?
>>
>>109334224
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Teach-Yourself-Hours-Complete-Starter/dp/0672326817
>>
>>109334224
Well, books still exist, but LLMs are also much more knowledgable than they are capable. If you learn from LLMs alone, you can still become a vastly better programmer than an LLM
>>
>>109334257
>more knowledgable than they are capable
cope, luddite snailcat codetrans chud
>>
>>109334224
why don't you learn AI instead?
>>
>>109334224
LLMs aren't "AI", can't rly program, and are pretty mid (or worse) at coding
I primarily offload boring repetitive shit to LLMs while I deal with more interesting stuff, and sometimes I use LLMs to vibecode one-shot scripts and the like



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.