It's maddening that everyone (me) built their browsing and even media archiving habits around Google Search/Photos not being complete pieces of shit, and now that they are, it's almost impossible to find shit that wasn't carefully organized (like it really should have been in the first place).Please tell me that decent tools for sifting through my gigabytes of archives are at least on the horizon.
>>109343596vibecoood one yourself
>>109343596Pre AI tools should still be able to help you to some extent
Bloombooru has AI tagging and can handle large image/video stasheshttps://github.com/mrblomblo/blombooru
Try this anon and use --strict-subfolders mode. Pics should be in top level directory along with folders for each category (milf, Latina, etc)Works well with gemma4 https://github.com/whp199/MemeDrawer
>>109343596Google image search has been severely neutered.It's swamped with AI slop, it's censored and the number of results is arbitrarily capped.I just tried out and it capped the results at about 300 even though it says there are 60 million results.
>>109343596You don't need to be a porn addict like a normie.>>>/x/42712109
should've kept a better archive upfront with hydrus or somethingai tools are not good at tagging porn stuff, especially fetish shit. the original sources for your archives had all that rigorously tagged already
>>109344860No, they're mostly Twitter/bsky/4chan downloads.
>>109344053>>109344422Thanks, I will look into these.
