This theory is from 1980s
and i finished it (the theory).show me what you have finished.. wat? dont hear ya
>>109385352lets see how space alien finishes it..> And get another one? The paperwork alone takes three weeks!The humor in this joke relies on subverting expectations through comedic juxtaposition: Divine Subversion — God is traditionally viewed as an omnipotent entity capable of reshaping creation at will. Refraining from striking down the individual subverts expected divine wrath. Bureaucratic Absurdity — The reason given for sparing the individual is not divine mercy, but rather the tedious administrative hassle of replacing a human. Mundane Framing — The act of creation is framed not as a miraculous event, but as a slow, red-tape-laden administrative task requiring weeks of paperwork.
is bloat inevitable?
>>109385020There is a difference between scope creep and maintenance where you get rid of defects of all sorts of kinds.
>>109385020We see this with UIs all the time. Norm cattle are incapable of saying "yep this is done lets move on". Nope, there is always another UPDOOT on the way
>>109386681according to the spiral of progress - yes
>>109386999can we solve this problem?
>>109387087solving the problem starts the progress spiral, so nope, only solution is a complete stasis, solving by not solving - placing the whole thing in a constrained box / into a strict isolation, like T.Davis did with his 16 colors and 640x480 resolution.
>>109388144what if we keep starting spirals ad infinitum
>>109388172spiral goes into infinity, continuing it with "solving the bloat problem" is futile, starting from the zero makes up a new project and a new spiral.
>>109388271that's what I meant, we keep spawning new spirals to support the first one and we don't stop. I think this will be fairly stable and the bloat will hit diminishing returns without much overhead
>>109388271wespeak - not nice, i speak - yes, better. maybe you can whirl more on an early stage, to forge the project, determining and planning better limit, kinda tactic
>>109386372>he's got a space alienBased. MIT, CIA and Linus Torvalds on suicide watch.
>>109388319no, you cannot get back, the irreversibility of the software is defined as a backward compatibility, that would be a new/different project which may be worse (more bloated)
>>109388374getting back like this, hmm