>muh Casio...no thanks. I prefer the Timex Ironman. I want to get laid, and bitches love Ironmen.
>>109397183Women only care about watches that look expensive. All g-shocks look like toys
>>109397183Timex watches are superior to casios in several ways. >better font>better software>better materials>better back screws >MUTHA FUCKING INDIGLO Casio straps are brittle shit plastic that always break, and i've had g-shocks that have the case screws strip out instantly. fucking shit. The fact i rarely hear these criticisms shows how little people really WATCH.
>>109397673indiglo is better than casios without illuminator, but worse than illuminator
feels good to be autistic and not constantly obsess about what women want from you
>>109397183Watches give women the ick.
>>109397673I've loved Indiglo most of my life, but recently had two watches in a row where it died quickly, so my current one is a Casio with LEDs. It's eye-searing for checking time in bed, but can work as a mini-flashlight in a pinch. They need to figure out a better light guide/diffuser for analog faces.
>>109399162Who cares what women think or want. That's why you have ether, duct tape, and ski masks.
>>109399102>but worse than illuminatorthis is a fucking absurd statement. illuminator is fucking cheap shit with a little led crammed in the case.>>109400679>had two watches in a row where it died quickly,damn. i've never had an timex die on me. i haven't needed a new one in a while. I hope quality didn't dip.
