>be rotting in some warehouse/book store self/thrift store for half a century and more>nobody even bother picking it up let alone digitize it>kalm.bmp>AI company reads it>rage.jfifexplain this behavior
name 5 examples
>>109399868something as self evident as the holocaust needs no proof
>AI company reads itTypical kike dishonesty. Destroying books so your chatbot can ingest them and leave no trace of the original is not reading.
>>109399887if those book were worth anything somebody would have picked it up sooner
>>109399897How kind of the benevolent corporations to decide what has value for me.
>>109399924so why didn't you go buy those valuable book and digitize and upload to internet archive or something
>>109399977People do this all the time you stupid disingenuous nigger
>>109399980does anyone have an answer?
>>109399887>plastic hoarding bad, just download the games/music/movies>paper hoarding good! don’t destroy the hecking rotting wood pulp!
>if I spam 50 threads about the same retarded disinformation then maybe I can gaslight people into believing itpost receipts or 42% yourself
>>109400007Again with the kike dishonesty. These books are not being made available digitally, they are being fed into corporate chatbots and then destroyed.
>>109400060Sure they are schizo
>>109399858>>AI company reads itAnd then shreds it.
>>109400007Well if piracy is so special, then why don’t you find all the books Anthropic horded? I challenge you to find five.
>>109400007medium change with time my niggajoin the great forward migration tradition
>>109399882Burning degen porn and studies on child rape, and transing children isn't wrong.
>>109400154Opps mythos is trained on the big CP
>>109399858We should also tear down historical buildings to build luxury condos instead.
>>109399977Maybe people didn’t buy those rare books because they can’t print money for themselves
>>109400113ever wonder why?? you fucking dumb fuck.
>>109400188then they aint worth shitanthropic doing humanity a favor
>>109399858>explainyou're autistic, anon. you will never get it.
>>109400226>cant explaintypical
>>109399858There's no reason to destroy the books after, otherwise no one would care. Any other direction for the topic is intentionally misleading.
>>109400233>tactical snailcatnice
>>109399858if only they kept the digital version instead of using it as training data to throw into the AI melting pot, then people wouldn't be as rage
>>109399858They don't just read it. They scan it and then destroy the original because some judge ruled that if you're the sole and last owner of the book it is considered fair use to turn it into training data.
>>109400337but thats like technicalityits the fault of copyright law if anything
>>109400357And somehow destroying books makes it okay? Even if the law says it's lawful? Are you retarded enough to equate lawfulness with morality?
nobody cared about that junk, obviously.
>>109400269They do keep the digital version.For themselves.The books are effectively lost from the public space.
i built a library in my house and just bulk bought a bunch of old books i'll never read. just thought it would be comfy to have a library. people were dying to give their books away, i got old encyclopedias and law books for pennies. pretending anyone cares about this stuff is laughable.
