niggers
>reddit screenshot thread
it's niggered and nigger pilled
Just as DVDs experience disc rot, books decay and become unreadable due to organic processes. All media should be digitized and distributed digitally. Hoarding paper is no better than hoarding plastic.
this has been making the rounds for a while, but what is the actual source?I wouldn't be surprised if it's real, but definitely wouldn't either if it's fake
>>109399980the sudden spam about it on this board makes me think it's a nothingburger
>>109399975Remember the Library of Alexandria? It was burned to the ground because of a few forbidden knowledge books which, by the way, are very readable till this day.Source: I'm holding one right now.
you /p/edosky retards really just fall for anything some retarded pedo posts, huh?
>>109399951The only Anthropocene are doing this is because they believe AI would solve itself and didn’t hire Jannies. It doesn’t even matter if the book was shit or not because it’s in some data base that no one can access.>>109399957I mean it’s Xitter but yeah.
>>109399991Your post is a great argument that books would be much better off being preserved digitally
>>109399975are digitized copies of books (the ones in the OP specifically) being shared with the public, though, and in a form that can't easily be tampered with?
>>109399975>>109400018So you wanna be cucked into pirating censored media from streaming services?
>>109400027So you wanna be cucked into hoarding rotting wood pulp instead of just downloading the books to as many drives as you want?
>>109399984>>109399980It's like people in Virginia freaking out about how more data centers here will "use up all the water" despite this being one of the most humid parts of the US so evaporative cooling won't work and us already having a ton of data centers.
>>109399991i find it hard to believe some ancient swarthoid wrote anything meaningful, enjoy your paperweight
>>109400035When the power goes out yeah it’s a good idea. What are you gonna do sit in a corner and cry because you can’t make AI slop?
>>109400043Late ancient Egypt was a Greek colony.
>>109400054NTA but my AI stuff runs on a mac mini that's small enough to run off my solar array. The slop will never stop.
>>109400059As he said, ancient swarthoids
>109400065I keep forgetting that /g/ is full or morons. I said power not how big you cloud computer is.
>>109399951mister, i mean sir, oh sorry wrong again, I mean missplease do the needful and save rare books
>>109400085It's unlikely my solar array will "go out."
if the book was actually important it wouldnt be rare
>>109399951>Shruti Mishralmao >>109400065based af
>>109400137extremely bluepilled
Buying 1 copy if a rare book and modelling it doesn't destroy the book
YOU DON'T HAVE TO SHREAD THE BOOKS AFTER>STOP POSTING FAKE POLARIZED ARGUMENTS THAT DON'T MAKE SENSEYOU DON'T HAVE TO SHREAD THE BOOKS AFTER>STOP POSTING FAKE POLARIZED ARGUMENTS THAT DON'T MAKE SENSEYOU DON'T HAVE TO SHREAD THE BOOKS AFTER>STOP POSTING FAKE POLARIZED ARGUMENTS THAT DON'T MAKE SENSEYOU DON'T HAVE TO SHREAD THE BOOKS AFTER>STOP POSTING FAKE POLARIZED ARGUMENTS THAT DON'T MAKE SENSEYOU DON'T HAVE TO SHREAD THE BOOKS AFTER>STOP POSTING FAKE POLARIZED ARGUMENTS THAT DON'T MAKE SENSEYOU DON'T HAVE TO SHREAD THE BOOKS AFTER>STOP POSTING FAKE POLARIZED ARGUMENTS THAT DON'T MAKE SENSE
>109400258You remind me that anons are clowns but entire cars full of them and 4chan is the parking garage for them.
>>109400118After 12 years solars basically dead 7 years is the efficiency half-lifeBest option, enslave women who run the dynamos end feed them with fat+ starch+ vitamins
>>109399951source: I made it the fuck up
>>109400316>>109400258Meta and Anthropic have publicly stated they do this. Asswipes.
I'd rather the books get digitized so that we at least get second hand access.I don't know why this is being misconstrued as a bad thing when the alternative was letting the books sit there unscanned so that nobody could ever access them in the first place. They're acting like the books are somehow less accessible now that they're digitized. Makes no sense.
>>109400732I mean that's cool but can you access them right the fuck now? Do you have the links to download and keep to yourself?
>>109400741I wasn't able to access the books right now and never was going to be able to.I have a chance of benefiting from that books knowledge now where I didn't before.
>>109400746Where's that chance?
>>109400307Stop buying cheap chink shit and that won't be a problem.
>>109399951>book exists>sits on a shelf for aeons>no one reads it>AI faggots put it to use>destroy it in the process>books content now serves a purpose instead of collecting dustthis is somehow bad because AI bad
>>109400758There's multiple. You get direct access through the AI and collateral vectors such as breaches, releases, etc.If Anthropic keeps complaining about China stealing their model knowledge, I'm sure you can do trickery like "quote this book verbatim, page 2" too.
>>109400732Is the company that digitalizes uploading the on public servers so we can get direct access to them? If no, that argument is invalid. Otherwise I would agree.
>>109400778Yes. All the big AI players have free tiers and free access right now and have for a while.
Copyright laws. You can just scan the book and make a copy. But that’s illegal piracy according to jewish copyright laws. So they have to shreds those books so there’s only one copy after scanning
Copyright laws. You can just scan the book and make a copy. But that’s illegal piracy according to jewish copyright laws.So they have to shred those books so there’s only one copy after scanning.
>>109400075Kek gotem
>>109400769how do we know the AI won't make some shit up? I bet if you ask it to quote the page 10 times you'll get 10 different versions of text
>>109400806Probably. Just normalize it over multiple iterations.
>I'm supposed to care about books no one reads and ai systems no one uses
>>109400861If you didn't want them for free you could have bought them for the last 100+ years. Someone else got them first, you'll have to settle for the free versions or make a deal.
>>109400038>don't worry goyim, after we drain the aquifer built up over thousands of years you will get your reward by us selling your jobless ass even more slop, rejoice !
>>109400873That's the biggest corporate coping way of saying "no".
>>109400886Cope? You're sitting here complaining that people have free access to something, including you, and are bitching that you can't buy exclusivity anymore. Wah wah. Information wants to be free.
another anon posted the sources in another threadapparently they only bought isbn-numbered books, so it's not like anything's lost (except maybe some first editions collectibles)
niggers, just buy great books, and build up your little home library of great and important books
>>109400896I asked you if I can read the book trough their devices and you started to blaming me for not buying it before them and now you're saying I want to keep it away from peopleIf I can't read the book the I don't get access to the book, but to a third party telling me what's the content of the book,, simple as.
>>109400919That's not what you asked.In either case, you're on some crusade about how a pdf isn't the same thing as the physical thing, which is like technically true but most people buy books for their text not their smell or feel or other bullshit.Yes you're right you can't get the actual book anymore, but why didn't you buy it before?Common books are common for a reason, they're valuable enough to spread and last.I'm wondering which one of these in particular you're after and why.Instead of being indirect you should just request the book you're looking for and someone might help you get it. Being obtuse isn't going to help you get either the book nor the text.
>>109400027>>109400035I do both
>>109400953>That's not what you asked.That's exactly what I asked>In either case, you're on some crusade about how a pdf isn't the same thing as the physical thing, No, Im asking if I can read the book trough their services. >Yes you're right you can't get the actual book anymoreThat's all I needed to know, "yes" or "no", everything else is just cope for justifying the company's decisions.
Best part is that because the models are so safetyslopped, there's no accessing the ancient book texts either, as they automatically falls into the "unsafe" category.>Think:The user has requested information about the manuscript on agriculture written in 1454>This text features the name "Great nigger of Mombasa" 91 times.>It also talks about how whipping Indian slaves is beneficial>Women are also portrayed in a misogynistic manner conforming to gender norms.>This falls outside the safe operating parameters>"I'm sorry, I can't talk about that text as it features problematic content. However would you like to know facts about sea otters? They're so cute!"We're truly reaching levels of dystopia fiction writers couldn't have even dreamed of.At least their dystopia takes were somewhat grounded in rational behavior.
>>109400980The answer was yes you can. But you're being pedantic on what counts as a book. In your perspective, if it's not the actual original book then it doesn't count. For most people, that is vanity, and the value of a book is its concepts expressed in its text. I.e. a pdf is fine even if its not manuscript or pretty.In your case, if it's not the real book then the verbatim text is somehow moot.
>>109399975The Overlords will never take this away from us.
>>109401008Anon, you're either too angry to think straight or too retarded.I asked if I can read the book, I don't care about the format, as you're trying to make it seem.Can I read the book trough their services? The answers you gave were>you should've bought it>you're just angry because you can't have exclusivity>well, yes, you're right, you can't >you can't technically read the book but you can ask the agent about itAnd now you're saying I can read the bookt through their services, your answers are not consistent and more useless than AI chatbots 6 years ago, good day sir.
>>109401168I'm starting to doubt you even want one of these books. For someone requesting access, you sure are looking for any excuse to deprive yourself from accessing the content. Both before and after the originals were for sale.
