How the fuck does a kernel attempt to kill init? What the hell is linux doing?
>>109405416the init may try to kill itself, e.g oom killer
>>109405416How the fuck does a brain decide to chop of the genitals off its body??
Vibecoded!
easy way to get this is to boot withinit=/bin/bashand then exit bash.
>>109405465But doesn't bash use escape sequences which need a pts to work?
>>109405465Wouldn't kill -9 1 just do it?
>>109405416>so yeah bro. Once we rewrite some modules and subsystems in Rust we will see more memory safety and performance increase in the kernel itself too. Just trust me, Rust work for everything!
>>109406123Based.
The kernel didnt attempt to kill init. Something tried killing init (PID 1) which can't be killed (it is the process that handles the killing of programs). The kernel shuts down as a safety mechanism , because letting it continue running could cause data corruption or security holes.
>>109405416>How the fuck does a kernel attempt to killIt sends the kill signal to the task how is this confusing?Although you probably just have a bad/missing initramfs.
>>109406335>The kernel shuts down as a safety mechanism ,It's not a safety mechanism, it literally doesn't have anything to do once the only process it starts automatically dies.
>>109405447True fpbp
>>109406885Yes it does. It could restart it or restore a snapshot, but this is extremely dangerous.
>>109405447The init is trans?
>>109405416The only circumstances I've ever seen this are when my initramfs shat itself and when systemd shat itself. I stopped seeing this when I switched to gentoo and stopped using an initramfs.
>>109405416In almost 3 years I have never seen this happen on Debian
>>109407374same with fedora, I don't get how people fuck their computers up so badly lmao I switched to Bazzite because of laziness on my new build, but that being said, I have never in my life seen like 90% of the issues on Linux people talk about here. Gotta be some viruses people get from visiting sketchy porn sites or something.
