[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 234739783.jpg (235 KB, 1670x1374)
235 KB JPG
>LTO6 setup now cheaper than a single 8TB HDD
whats the catch?
>>
>>109418892
We do what we did when we had C64s and made dinner, while waiting for the tape to finish loading a game
>>
>>109418892
>whats the catch?
Random access.
>>
>>109418892
What do you mean "now"?
It's been cheaper since always.
I'm pretty sure the first remotely affordable 1TB medium was LTO in fact.
It's just not fast whatsoever.
>>
>>109418892
the tape drive machines cost is in the thousands
>>
>>109418892
Slow. It's best for archival purposes. Also the drives themselves are expensive.

>>109419007
Used ones are less than $1000, but yeah.
>>
>>109419007
not sure if you checked hdd prices recently but so are they
>>
>>109418892
the catch is that tape is for people who write a lot of data that they'll never read



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.