Do you agree that it no longer qualifies as an "HD" standard? Is this a subject that shouldn't be bound by a static definition and instead updates over time?
>>109420215I don't agree with anything, some people cannot afford more than 720p, it's HD to them, and that's fine.What people need to focus more on is that when I plug in a fucking 2160p monitor in 2026 websites should respect that space and fucking USE IT.
>>109420215Before av1 and weird pixel patterns and pixel shaping algorithms, 720p used to be okay. Now even 1080p looks dogshit blurry
>>109420215i'll be real witchu dog i dont need more than 720p unless it's a movie i'm gonna play on a tv
This is an area where AI should be helping me live a more full life.I can clearly see what the image is supposed to be, it just looks too fuzzy because I'm blowing it up on a larger image, AI should easily be able to make the image match what I'm seeing without having to make a best approximation, just without the artifacts that come with using a larger canvas for a smaller picture.
>>109420215It was never HD and the fact that 1080p had to always be qualified as "Full HD" is fucking retarded. What do you mean "Full HD"? It's HD end of story. 720p is a cop out and it annoy me to end that there are still streaming services that only deliver 720p on desktop and won't do proper HD.
>>109420534So...what is it? Mid-Definition?
>>109420215you can simply choose to not use any marketing terms and call resolutions what they are in pixels. 1280x720. 1920x1080.
I sometimes come across media (porn) in 720p and if the bit rate is high enough it looks quite good on my 1440p monitor.
>>109420913The "p" refers to "progressive scan". There's a 1920x1080 standard that uses interlace scan so the designation is needed, FAGGOT.
>>109420215bit rate is what truly makes HD. High bit rate 720 is HD, heck even 480 almost qualifies as HD if the bit rate is high enough.
>>109421030interlacing belongs sometime in the previous century.
>>109420300>respect that space and fucking USE IT.You mean by making everything bigger, so that there is less information on the screen as on my 1024x768 screen in 2003...
>>109421034>bit rate is what truly makes HDtrvkelow bitrate 1080p, heck even some very low bitrate 4K I've seen, barely qualify as HD
>>109420215According to the FCC, it never did.
Yep 720p looks bad on my 2k screen, while it looked kinda ok on my old 1080p monitor
