>hey codex, I need you to add some pointless refactors and random extra parameters and change at least 1,000 lines of code, then intentionally introduce a minor bug in the commit so that I can pretend to fix it in the next commit to justify not getting deported back to china along with my entire communist family>make sure to clear this conversation after this session ends so no one can know I am a fraud who has no idea how to code. No one must know I use codex to develop codex.
Is that their main pitch and claim, self-improvement?
>>109432961>hey codex let's work on making this code DEI compliant and a little more woke
>>109432961Do any of these changes actually reflect in the final product? These commits are all just bloat that doesn't improve anything.
>>109433167haven't seen this code - but yes, AI is able to actually make changes that fix/improve something.sure, it also sometimes makes these changes to fix what it broke first. it can however also fix some small stuff you manually broke at times (try it I guess, idk disconnect event handling from a button or w/e - it might figure it out) so it's not like it's all JUST a sham.
>>109433230There's a difference between an end user using codex and the actual developers for codex using codex. You can't fix something using broken tools.>yes, AI is able to actually make changes that fix/improve something.You're sure these devs are actually trying to improve codex and not just pretending to look busy?
>>109433088luddites don't use AI thoughverbait
>>109433246> There's a difference between an end user using codex and the actual developers for codex using codex.A mild difference?> You can't fix something using broken tools.Depends on the degree of breakage, but you usually can.>You're sure these devs are actually trying to improve codex and not just pretending to look busy?I am not, no. Maybe they're just trying to look busy.
>>109433282>A mild differenceOh okay, so I can just walk in OpenAI's office tomorrow and ask for a job and they'll give me one right away starting at 6 figures plus bonuses and all I'll need to do is vibe code and browse reddit all day? I mean that's exactly what these chinks are doing so why can't I?
>>109433300it really did not occur to me to consider this from the angle of how much income you earn? you could directly be working for seven figures under jensen huang and taking a shitposting break from smoking whatever these people are consuming to "plan" AI investmentsseemed more like a question about the difference in "success"/"efficacy"/"sense" of using a technology tool on itself vs other (end user's) software
>>109433351It's not about the money, it's about having foreigners into your workspace and shitting it up
when does vibeshit start being of service to humanity instead of just finding software vulnerabilities and generating entropy?
