>Halo 2 Vista >Runs DX9 and perfectly fine on Windows XPWhat did Microsoft mean by this exactly?
>>109435704people don't care about OSs for naggers and retards let alone games for those OSs for retards and naggers
>>109435704>Mi PCWhat did he mean by this?
>>109435704I hated that game so much. Gravemind made the Flood lose all impact. Mindless plague that devours everything on the way, like a terrifying unstoppable force of nature? Nah, there's an intelligent tentacle monster in charge. Fuck you, whoever wrote that crap!
I heard that Microsoft could have continued DirectX support on XP if they wanted to. There was nothing technically preventing it.On another timeline we could still be using XP.
*blow me away starts playing*
>>109439784DX10 required WDDM which was not on XP and is not a simple dll that you could throw in there. it was a whole subsystem inside the kernel>why not just add it to xpthen you'd have vista but with xp skin
>>109439784>>109441189In another timeline PC would have got DX9.5 like Xbox 360. Crysis could have had object motion blur in DX9 but it was artificially locked to DX10. The console ports and ini tweaks proved that the tech was possible on DX9.
>>109435704>Haloits a shitplay COD4 (2007)>>>/vm/2521050
>>109435704>play gaylo>permanently looking through a scope
>>109435704Speak English please.
>>109435704The XP patch will crash at the gravemind cutscene.
