[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: ip.jpg (36 KB, 840x178)
36 KB JPG
>ipv4 is very bad and insecure and NAT is useless
>ok then hack me
>well, actually, [angry wall of text involving moving goal posts and making up impossible scenarios, zero actual arguments]

why is everyone like this when discussing ipv4?
>>
can you point to an archive page or where did this happen
>t. always participates in the ipv6 v ipv4 faggotry

ipv6 has deny all incoming on by default on every shitbox router ive come across so they're equivalent and privacy extensions make mac address privacy worries a moot point, yeah its not perfect but thats mostly thanks to shit implementation on ISP level as usual
>>
>>109471732
introducing ipv5
255.255.255.255.001
>>
>>109471732
How else are we supposed to get all the saars and chinks online? Stop being so antisemitic.
>>
>>109471732
Don't know about insecure, but yes, IPv4 sucks ass.
>>
File: shot_1785962744.png (65 KB, 849x615)
65 KB PNG
>>109471732
I like ipv8, backwards compatible with ipv4,
>comfy numbers only addresses

way way better than the cancer that is ipv6
>>
>>109471961
>the cancer that is ipv6
you can tell it's deliberate by design, malevolent almost
>>
>>109471732
>why is everyone like this when discussing ipv4?

Everyone is like that when discussing any old tech that still works.
See X vs Wayland or C vs Rust. People's heads are totally boiling for no good reason from the mere fact that X and C still work.
>>
>>109471732
Because neither side is interested at all in discussing the underlying technology they just want another proxy to seethe about football team politics.
>>
>>109471732
It's mostly just thirdies malding they are banned from everything because half their state is CGNATted behind the same IPv4 address and they house like 50 scam call centers and everyone cheats at online games.
Which stops them from doing the same.

The rest is (((security))) product vendors who are supermalding that any ol' router with NAT is doing more for cyber security than their shitty firewalls, mystery middleboxes that try to tell apart legitimate traffic from cyber attacks by heuristics that never work and ban legitimate traffic all the time and software that makes a 24 core 128GB super machine crawl worse than a Core2Duo the moment anything tries to write to disk.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.