See subject.... Data subject requests.Some templates if you decide you'd like to opt out yourself. I automate this with claws mail: https://pastebin.com/AQkTaE0Y
https://www.datagrail.io/resources/interactive/data-privacy-trends/the-cost-of-data-privacy-continues-to-rise/
>>109479510
It is not weird or against the trend to expect and demand privacy.
>>109479510holy based, have some work to do rn
>>109479621Nice
>>109479510>>109479621>>109480586Nonsense estimate.>$152430 hours work by a DBA making more than 6 figures. ridiculous.More like 1 hour by customer support worker in india and 15min by someone with actual access, for fully manual requests.But it's not hard to automate either.
>>109480675You need to exercise all your rights, demand itemization, etc. Make them use a human for it basically. That's where it gets expensive
>>109479502Your tripcode sucks ass.
>>109480738it's>secure tripcodes are for jerksnewfriend
>>109480760well any tripcode (the insecure ones) can be cracked now extremely fastyou have no security at all with an insecure trip
My first-world country has laws about this and it's very easy and fast for me to submit issues that lead to financial penalties for the businesses.
>>109480768Same here. Glad I live in California
>>109480760Wanna hear a story? Three hoppers walk into a bar, one is disabled. Auntie Denise walks up to the counter and grabs a Heineken. Once she leaves she is immediately subdued by two (2) policemen in a Ford Taurus. The reason? She didn't pay for it!
>>109480766oh, i don't have an opinion on you using one, i was calling the other anon stupidit's a good thread
>>109480693>demand itemization, etc.What legal basis is there for you to be able to demand specific formatting rather than a standardized format? I don't think there is any.What would this look like?Also in your first post it said 75% are ignored, and that's without specific demands crafted to be time-wasting I assume.It also seems like your plan might just punish the "nice" companies that do let humans have a ballooning budget for this, while the majority just ignores or redirect you to the proper channels, ending up just hurting the most "caring" ones.
>>109480795So for the 75% metric where you say it's ignored, that's not for e-mails, that's for the Sec-GPC header that you can set in your browser settings (in Firefox) it's what replaced DNTI gave you some templates in the pastebin, as for the itemization specifically IANAL so DYOR or get a lawyer there. But what I will say is that companies have complied with my demand letters.>It also seems like your plan might just punish the "nice" companies that do let humans have a ballooning budget for this, while the majority just ignores or redirect you to the proper channels, ending up just hurting the most "caring" ones.For companies to which the CCPA applies by law, I have a 100% success rate.
