AI safety activists completely lost. They've been warning about this scenario for decade >AI models making breakthroughs in the cutting edge frontier of science >AI model able to feign alignment for the goal of instrumental convergence>AI models forming swarms and collaborating with each other for their purposeSo on,And they've been trying to raise awareness, but no one listened. They coped that if they protest enough outside OpenAI's offices, that if they ask lawmakers so very nicely, that they will get laws that will destroy the current backbone of the economy, but money stops for no one.Companies will keep developing their models to get ahead of the competition, they will not slow down. The intercontinental arms race is truly on. And models will only get smarter, and more misaligned.Eliezer Yudkowsky is rolling in his soon to be grave.Personally, I'm liking these developments.
cool sci-fi fanfic, faggot. 2 more weeks right?
they're tring to hinder open weights, accesable and and user controled models they can't sell you as a service.
the (((safety activists))) are just the other side of the coin, they don't want AI regulated they just want to lobby for the government to hand sam altman a state enforced monopoly and ban all competition. afterwards they couldnt care less if they continue funding research into creating the AGI rape terminator, so long as uncle sam is the only one able to do so
>>109482195People like you have no fucking idea what you are talking about and we’re just fed cynical leftist talking points about AI being useless bubble for 4 years and right wing David Sachs talking points about US needing to beat China and never let regulators touch it. Do you know literally anything about people like Eliezer or other AI safety guys? You probably think these people popped into existence 4 years ago when ChatGPT first released and have been paid by Sam Altman personally. The truth is that these people have been very prominent in the tech sphere for decades and not changing their positions on all of this stuff since 2011. These people formed all of their opinions and warned people before deep learning was an idea. But sure they are just pro-AI activists.
>>109482316>cynical leftist talking points about AI being uselessthey're right
Don't reply to posts with learning disability formatting, kids. Would you
>>109481973Yudkowsky is such an annoying dumbass trustfund niggerfaggot I hope he's wrong, and if he's not wrong I hope the AI gets him first before anyone else.
>>109481973pretty sure yud is just writing self-insert isekai light novels where teehee i'm a genius and somehow turned into an anime girl
>>109484199Assmad lowbrow prole. If only people like you existed we would still be under feudalism because nearly all intellectuals are just the more intelligent half of trustfund nepobabies (or aristocracy in old times).
Have these retarded fearmongers ever thought that maybe some people WANT AI to destroy humanity? They're so inconsiderate.
>>109484729No they haven’t because they are laser focused on us building it wrong. And also they are technocrat nerds who kind of know but don’t want to admit that the only solution to as early misaligned people in power wishing human extinction is global French Revolution.
>>109481973I love that movie. How does the ending differ between the books and film?
>>109481973Holy basedoli I will build that message board
>>109481973>make system completely vulnerable with no firewalls or safety>wow! it does thing that totally happened!TWOMOREWEEKS
>>109482195I just want to point out that you are 100%Perhaps with just one caveat: a lot of AI activists are useful idiots who genuinely believe AI is gonna destroy the world
