[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • You may highlight syntax and preserve whitespace by using [code] tags.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1768796762333944.png (8 KB, 540x344)
8 KB PNG
What's the best file system to use for 1) system partition 2) data storage?
>>
you just posted it
>>
>>109482022
F2FS
>>
File: CS.jpg (243 KB, 1554x2176)
243 KB JPG
>bocchi the rock file system
>>
>>109482022
ext4

stop being weird
>>
>>109482028
fpbp
>>
>>109482022
Bocchi on my cock
>>
>>109482022
ext4
>b-but
ext4
>>
reiserfs
>>
btrfs confuses me because half the people I know say it's the best fs and half say it's a joke fs and will cause data corruption guaranteed.
I've been using it since Fedora didn't let me pick anything else and I was too lazy to go back to manually partition my SSD and reinstall but I am wondering if I should use ext4 on my new PC.
>>
>>109482022
Bocchi the rock file system is my favorite because it has a cool name
>>
>>109484201
it's the difference between people who've used it for 10 years and people who heard about it 10 years ago
>>
>>109482022
1) NTFS 2) NTFS
>>
>The filesystem developer has fallen in love with the ai chatbot!
>>
>>109482022
1) btrfs
2) ZFS
Everything else is obsolete or meme
>>
>>109484201
There was an extensive RedHat campaign to shill XFS, and it funnily lost in RedHats own distro.
The one time the Fedora community managed to overrule RedHat orders was when they decided for BTRFS rather than RHEL shilled XFS.

I use BTRFS since it was experimental, so more than ten years, and i never experienced any problems with it.
>switch to ext4
ext4 doesn't have checksums and cant do compression.

What you can do, is to use the btrfs features that make sense to you. Like compression does make a filesystem faster, additional to saving space, when the CPU can compress faster than your drive can write. This means that the choice of compression (and if you want to use it at all) depends a lot on your hardware and use case.
Use subvolumes that make sense to you.
Disable cow on folders with large files.
>>
>partition
you don't need those when the filesystem has volume management.
>>
>>109482022
f2fs for system
btrfs for medias and systems saves (zfs looks better for thit, but i'm too lazy)
>>
>bad update
>reboot into snapshot
>rollback
>boot into latest
>system working as normal
Anyone not using BTRFS or some COW implementation is a retard
>>
>>109486482
>savescumming
dishonest behavior
>>
>>109484159
Shit's killer.
>>
File: chii_pantsu.gif (227 KB, 500x281)
227 KB GIF
>>109485905
He is a based /g/entleman
I too love my wAIfu
>>
>>109482022
ZFS handles datasets better than btrfs honestly



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.