Mic Drop
>>109497267Yes. I can get through an entire lifetime.Go back to r/claudeai, retarded faggot.
Yes, no problem.I just wish search wasn't so fucked on pretty much all search enginesHaving an AI hallucinate an answer is often better than whatever Google search gives me, that's more a critique of Google search than anything.t. Programmer
>>109497267Imagine if corporate cock sucking indians didn't shit on the street and the internet?
>>109497267Yes.
>>109497267yes, that would change nothing in my life
>>109497267The answer is yes. Did he actually think this was some kind of "gotcha" question?
>>109497267Real mic drop here is that OP actually though this was a mic drop. Retarded /vcg/ citizen.
>>109497267are they a powerful tool?surecould i do without?also yeahive been programming since before the llm era.
>>109497267I'm not a programmer. Getting AI involved in the first place would violate lots of internal security rules.
>>109497267work used to be copy-pasting from google and stackoverflow. now work is copy-pasting from AI
>>109497267I never used it in the first place, I use understanding and introspection to code
>>109497267I'm pro AI, even wrote my own agent harness, and I could.
>>109497267Yeah? Grew up without it you know?
>>109497267If explosive diarrhea disappeared tomorrow, could you still get through an entire workday without explosive diarrhea?
>>109497267I've never used it in the first place LMFAO
>>109497267more like designated shitting street shit drop
It has been months since I even tried to use a shatbot for anything.
>>109497267the question that raped luddites...
>>109497267I don't even have a job lmao
>>109497267based, luddites get the rope
>>109497267I'm already not using that shit.
>>109497267The answer is yes and I'm not even anti-AI. It's not like I suddenly lost the ability to do my job.
Yes. It's wrong 30% of the time anyway and I use it for legal research
>>109497267Oh no, I'd have to go back to writing my own emails again, no more "Looks like you did this" or "While we do x, we actually will do Y"
>>109497267>look mom, I posted this bait again!>>109471886
>>109497267Lol, my workplace has an anti-ai policy pending further research so it wouldn't matter at all.
If your need AI to do your job why doesn't your employer just cut the middleman and have AI to it?
>>109497267What is a workday?
>>109497281>Having an AI hallucinate an answer is often better than whatever Google search gives me, that's more a critique of Google search than anything.That's because AI is at least trying to answer your search request.Google search engine is only trying to sell you stuff.>>109497267Easy. Better sooner than later.
>>109497267Now do blockchain
>>109497267I handle 200 degree fahrenheit aluminum ingots for a living. I'll be fine.
>>109497267>this people are allowed to vote
>>109498090That's because voting doesn't change anything. It's simply the best divide and conquer tool any elite could ask for.
>>109497267bitch I don't use AI at all ever, wtf are with these domesticated losers who depend on it already
>>109497267post link or fake
>>109498284If voting doesn't do anything why do (they) spend so much money on getting the people (they) own elected?
Of course I could. My work would just be worse, and slower.
>>109497445
>>109499224That's why voting doesn't do anything.
>>109497267yep. ai has done nothing then turn us all into mice on meth
>>109497267Yeah i can sit all day and play ps2 rpg's on my chinkheld if AI disappeared tomorrowt. IT in a 1400~ employee office (glorified active directory and vmware janitor)
>>109497267this has to be a troll, nobody someone this dependent on AI would type all this without any self awareness.
>>109497267They're so delusional. Ai psychosis recognized as an institutionalizing mental illness when?
I would care exactly 0% about AI if it wasn't raping PC prices across the board. Not a fan of having to actually worry about my disk space because drives are thousands of dollars now.
>>109497280fpbp>OP STATUS: BTFO'D (ALSO GAY AND RETARDED)
>>109497267
>>109499224voting changes things for headline issues (Trump vs Kamala for mass immigration, for example). for "will there be a federal budget line item for pork I want?" ask yourself how much in campaign donations and lobbying did you allocate. they spend on that, do you?
>>109497267I don’t understand. Does he think that staunchly anti-AI people are using AI daily despite their feelings about it?
>>109497267Lmao I don't use AI for work because I have to do things with physical items using my hands. I use gemini maybe once a week when I want something more in depth than a regular google search, but all that does is pull from some reddit thread so I could go straight there instead. The people who would be most affected are those with parasocial relationships with chatbots but they're dysgenic anyway and deserve any amount of suffering coming to them.
The only AI I use is the one that gives you summaries every search engine throws in your face, and only because my internet is so bad opening more pages takes significant time. Like half the time I check the given sources they're complete bullshit like a comment by a single redditor and anything involving numbers always comes out wrong, but for finding the answer to a simple question it can pull straight from wikipedia it's just barely capable.Anything more in depth I end up having to wrangle google search myself and force it to show me anything decent with quote search shenanigans that get me flagged as a bot. When they eventually remove that feature we're all fucked.
>>109502672Any proven examples? Any time I use my custom solution, I find the results to be grounded. Note that this isn't actually Google, but my custom built solution for search which I use personally and without monetization.
>>109502707>7Huh, that's interesting.>>109499299You'd still need the keyboard to actually put that introspection understanding into practice.
>>109497267yes, easilyI'd just google shit like I used to
>>109497267Addict assumes everybody else is an addict
>>109497267Yeah I'd have no problem. I don't use it anyways.>>109497280fpbp
>>109503079Personally I'm taking a break for a while and am gonna enjoy talking to some humans for a change.
>>109497267I never used AI and never will. AI has no reason to exist. I see all AI users as an inferior species.
>>109503114Have you ever made a search on Google.com?Have you ever used a browser such as Safari, Google Chrome, Chromium, Firefox, etc? Were they up to date?Have you ever used Tiktok, Pinterest, Instagram, Reddit, Snapchat, or Telegram?If yes, then you've used AI, directly or indirectly.
>>109503138I'll add some additional contexthttps://web.archive.org/web/20260302133822/https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/ai-search-engine
>>109503079I tried going back to regular googling and it's impossiblegemini makes finding shit vastly more efficientnot to mention it already has workarounds for when shit inevitably doesn't work
>>109503171I replaced it with my own solution so I could not support google because they treat their employees like shit among various other good reasons to not use google products. Still working on replacing it 100% of the time, but that's the nature of it. Notice how I write about my experience with google products, it sounds oddly familiar to how one would write about a drug addiction, don't you think? Google products are definitely addictive, and that is by design.
>>109502672I think we’ll all be ok without the summary. Plus the only people who would be fucked would be dumbasses.
>>109503260What do you mean by fucked?
>>109497267i already do this daily
>>109497267We were literally doing shit without AI a couple of years ago.
>>109503359Seo and intentional result blocking to make ai look better
I dont need A.I. to make software.
>>109497267It would be fucking awesome, really. Fuck AI.
>>109497590It would be difficult.
This is an example of GEO, if you were wondering if it was a real thing or not, or if you were wondering/debating if I know how SEO/GEO works, well, this should be proof enough that I do. After all, it's the #1 search on Google AND Gemini right now. Again, I strongly dislike Google products, and I am avoiding them, but I will point out, I do know what I'm talking about.
you are genuinely mentally ill if you rely on ai at all in your daily life outside of work
>>109503952Moron, I just demonstrated to you that I know how SEO/GEO works, my video game, Tumblien, is recognized by Google, the #1 search engine on earth, just by its tagline alone. If that doesn't make me a recognizable game developer, what the fuck does? Where is your game?
>>109503964ok good for you?
>>109497267Yes?
>>109503281Fucked as in they wouldn’t be able to spew their shit everywhere. They need AI as a crutch because they’re talentless.
>>109503981Thanks. I would appreciate it if you'd stop acting like you are qualified to assess someone's mental illness or lack thereof. That is left exclusively to qualified and licensed medical professionals, and in cases pertaining to me, my treating physician, and one of my choice. That is a fact. And yes, under a situation where the medical industry were owned by the State, such as a framework similar to that of the UK, I would also maintain that choice.
>>109504003tell your prompt good job for writing out that sentence for you as well as attaching an visual representation of yourself :)
>>109504030I wrote it myself.
>>109497267What a stupid fucking question, of course I could still do work without LLMs, I've been programming since before them, and before Stack Overflow, and even before Google.
>>109504035Oh... embarassing.
>a ha! but what if people who don't use ai suddently had to stop using ai? ever consider that?!honestly can't even think of a use for ai with my work. most people did just fine without asking a chatbot for anything and will continue to do so
>>109507518>honestly can't even think of a use for ai with my work.That's on you.
>>109503138>googlenot anytime recently, got rid of my account entirely in 2014>safari, chrome, firefoxi use pale moon>tiktok, pintrest, instagram, reddit, snapchat, telegramhaven't use any of them outside of rarely ending up on a reddit thread from a search query
>>109497267I honestly don't give a shit about what I do at work. This is question is entirely my employer's problem and no one else's.
>>109497267imagine how small his world is, jfc
>>109497281>t. Programmerlol, find a real job
it's getting harder and harder to tell what posts are trolls nowadays as people get dumber and dumber.
>>109497406OP is posting a screenshot of retarded ragebait that he previously posted in twitter and nobody cared about (that's why the bottom of the image is cut off)
>>109507559Then you've used AI.
>>109507942ending up on a reddit page has only gotten less useful over time. the last time i did i couldn't even view the page without logging in so that's probably the last time i'll be clicking on a reddit link
>>109507990It still works for me. Do you have any examples where you ended up on a reddit page and didn't find what you were looking for? What did you search for, what did you find on reddit, what did you not find, what were you looking for?
>>109508022half the time it's someone asking the same thing but with no replies or useless replies (i.e. do Y instead). it's been a while since i visited any so i don't have a specific link or example. not sure how that counts as using ai either. i actually don't have a burning hatred of ai in general, i just don't find them very reliable. i use a local llm for some fetish porn writing but the times i've tried using them for research or finding specific information they often make shit up which is less than useless. i can't imagine relying on one for anything important like work. heard some stories about that from friends, like one said his company wanted to use ai for some stuff and one worker sent an email to a customer written by an llm without even proof-reading it and the llm wrote something very rude to the customer.if someone can't do their job without an ai then that person can't do that job at all.
>>109508117Because their site is partially built using AI. Historically it was originally written by hand in Python iirc. The repo is still up on github. >use a local llm for some fetish porn writing but the times I've tried using them for research or finding specific information they often make up which is less than uselessSo how did you implement RAG? You need a RAG. If you don't know what RAG is, you haven't been using AI very long. All I'm seeing so far is anecdotal bullshit, no professional experience. Any competent AI Professional would know what a RAG is. It is 2026, it is here, we live in the today, and are forward thinking towards the future. I expect you to know what RAG is if you want to talk about this technology seriously on this board.>ai for some stuff and one worker sent an email to a customer written by an llm without even proof-reading it and the llm wrote something very rude to the customer.1) She is probably using an unofficial AI system that is meant for consumers. This happens all the time, it's called "Shadow-IT", and it is a real thing that happens.https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/shadow-it (You should use an archive link, IBM is a shitty company, I've got other things I'm working on right now)So I'll leave it at that, for now. But you are NOT experienced with this technology, and you clearly have no basis from which you can draw any reasonable opinion on its value.
>>109508178i didn't use my local llm for research. i know what RAG is but i don't need that to write porn.also if you're wondering, yes i use this because i csn't write stories myself for shit.
Currently quizzing my knowledge on DeepSeek. it tends to be brutally honest.
the left taking on a strong anti-tech and anti-ai bent has noting to do with consumer rights, workers, water, or whatever. if it did they wouldnt be pro illegal immigration and anti tariffwhat it's actually about is they want to force the AI bubble to pop NOW so Trump and Republicans get the blame and get punished at the polls. guarantee if there is no pop by 2028 dems will suddenly do the most cringe inducing about-face and become pro tech. they'll have to. sabotaging the economy while theyre in control of it would be suicide
>>109508320I like this read. It makes sense.
>>109508320Only half true, the majority of people aren't thinking about the connection between AI failing and republicans failing.But what will happen is democrats will platform on being Anti-AI and super pro-regulation and then if they win they'll cut back on any promises they made. They might implementation some regulation that doesn't do anything.
>>109508501>the majority of people aren't thinking about the connection between AI failing and republicans failingthey dont have to be. you just need the key policy pushers and influencers to think about it then tell the puppets to dance
>>109497267how can I live wthout the cat pictures
>>109508501Pretty much this. >>109508320Also this, they know it's a time bomb and simply want it to explode because they don't want to be left with it. They really don't plan on ever fixing any of the problems its created.There are thousands of cameras right now feeding into the AI bubble that they're perfectly fine with because they're aware that, sooner or later, the police AI state will be theirs and they can send all of the wrongthinkers to camps.
>>109500920Anybody? Can somebody explain this to me please? I’m really confused.
>>109497267Yeah, I've literally never used those tools.
Human intelligence isn't as good as you think, you have neurodivergence, mental disorders, intellectual disabilities, Alzheimer's, brainwashing and conspiracy theorists. Very few humans (around 1-2%) are capable of playing it straight to PhD level thinking and compete with frontier AIs.Where we think of AGI, it will be able to all the jobs the average Bachelor's or High School educated people can do, and Artificial Super Intelligence will overcome all human brain flaws and operate with perfect logic and reasoning. It already has the whole of the internet's training data, now it needs to think and synthesise the whole missing gaps in the tree of knowledge, or the missing puzzle pieces in the Wikipedia sphere logo.Just remember, in the quest to fight AI slop, we started finding all the human slop as well.
>>109502707Why do you talk to Google search like your CIA from the dark knight rises?
>>109497267it'd make my life better actualy.
>>109497267see >>109497280mic dropwe survived for thousands of years without AI, we can endure the rest of our lives without it.unlike you (OP), most of us didn't throw our brain away when AI came out
>>109497672uh...based?
>>109497267I dont use any ai. I still want it to progress. Where does that put me?
>>109509917Hello? Anybody? Please help me understand what he meant by that? Help?
>>109512745it's bait
>>109497267what a retarded question to ask. The correct question is: Would your current life change. Most people's wouldn't, which speaks to how trivial their vendetta against AI is and how their current circumstances are entirely their fault not AI's
>>109497280/threadFurther replies are exclusively from those who are more retarded than me and OP combined.
>>109512957OP is bait. The tweet is clearly something else.
>>109513000>The tweet is clearly something elseIt's just engagement slop, people just post outrageous or blatantly incorrect info so people comment "nuh uhh, it's this that and the other you idiot" and then get paid.
>>109497267Absolutely yes. I mostly use AI to write email responses in corpo language. I could do it myself, but lawyers like to be spoken to like children.
>>109508320>what it's actually about is they want to force the AI bubble to pop NOW so Trump and Republicans get the blame and get punished at the polls. guarantee if there is no pop by 2028 dems will suddenly do the most cringe inducing about-face and become pro tech. they'll have to. sabotaging the economy while theyre in control of it would be suicideThats just basic politics. Republicans have consistently tanked the economy, then Dems come in touting themselves as saviors. 4-8 years later, the country gets pissed at pussy Dems again, and the cycle repeats.I don't give a shit about either party, but the faster this AI shit pops, the less the dinosaurs in Washington will care about computers in general.
>>109497267What a stupid post lmaooooo
>>109498031i wish it were that benign
>>109512974So you don't mind me stalking you and taking regular shits on your desk, I see.
>>109497267I don't even use AI in the first place.
