[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.109512741
File: ios-tracks.jpg (102 KB, 1800x1013)
102 KB JPG
 No.109512741 Archived
Is Audacity better than Garage Band
>>
Anonymous
 No.109512756
 No.109512756
>>109512741
fl studio >
>>
Anonymous
 No.109512947
 No.109512947
>>109512741
No.

>>109512756
Obviously any full-fledged DAW is going to be far more capable than a linear audio editor or a lightweight DAW for on-the-fly compositions.
>>
Anonymous
 No.109513195
 No.109513195
>>109512947
your question is already kinda skewed though comparing a music creation studio with a surgical audio editor
>>
Anonymous
 No.109513691
 No.109513691
>>109513195
I'm answering OP's moronic question, you insufferable buffoon.
>>
Anonymous
 No.109515622
 No.109515622
>>109512741
>Audacity
was never good.
>>
Anonymous
 No.109515662
 No.109515662
>>109512741
Audacity 2.x is better.
I don't have insights into the development, but 3.x has been a downfall like hardly any other.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.