I don't get ads like this. I don't have a fancy AMOLED but my screen can still display the image on the left just fine and it looks better than the one of the right. Seems like a content issue.
>>109522039I've tried all types of monitors, same for smartphone screens, they're all shit and HRD is snake oil.
>>109522039I have jeets repaint my wall for every frame, it's cheaper than buying a and running a TV
>>109522699But the smell, anon, curry shit doesn't come out of drywall
>>109522039>I don't get ads like thisit's almost like ads are meant to appeal to the masses and it's almost like the masses are a retarded cattle herd
>>109522039it's like a perfume ad: it's meant to give you a vague idea because just like you can't smell the perfume from a screen, you can't view a better screen from a screen. IF the company is being somewhat honest, when they want to advertise a 200 nit screen when 100 is standard*, an ad where "our screen" is pure white (FFFFFF) square, and "normal screen" is a gray (808080) square, then this is the closest depiction they can make of an actual comparison, although they just sort of guesstimate and >>109523669 is pretty much right, consoomers don't care*I know nits aren't linear, I just can't be assed to do the actual math rn
