This any good? I loved svelte, but I hated that 90% of the docs were so svelteKit centric you couldn't even figure out how to install Svelte alone without going through 3 doc links.
>>109536793
>>109536793>I hated that 90% of the docs were so svelteKit centric you couldn't even figure out how to install Svelte alone without going through 3 doc links.The usual retardation from Rich Harris.
>>109536793make your webpage without any javascript.
>>109536793you are the reason Claude replaced frontend fags, you cant even run a single npx command without being handheld
wtf. just use server side templates and htmx
>>109537295>>109537330It's a local SPA, not a webpage.>>109537261It's a shame really. I like a lot of his ideas, but I refuse to do backend in node, I hate it.>>109537329>you cant even run a single npx command without being handheldI don't want to run an npx command. I want the package name so I can npm install it and use the compiler as I see fit, without having to install a bunch of transitive dependencies.You reek of reactfaggot, and your breath stinks of dick. Get off my thread.
>>109537397>I like a lot of his ideasLike what?
>>109537503No virtual domsStatic toolsMarkdown componentsI also like the design of svelte 5, it was really pleasant to use.But the project itself is not trustworthy in my opinion. There have been way too many versions of svelte with radical changes for me to take it that seriously, and I do not appreciate that SvelteKit is the first thing they point to in their documentation, to me that sends a message I don't like.
>>109537627>No virtual doms>Static tools>Markdown components>I also like the design of svelte 5, it was really pleasant to use.None of those are his ideas.
