>>109548256
Firefox has had protection for this over 9 years :D Holy shit Google Brave MITM Spywarium is trash.

>>109548298
>Firefox has had protection for this over 9 years :D

kek, brave users are tards.
thank you /g/ anon. <3

>>109548256
>Is this real or fake?
The possibility? Yeah, you just disable webgl or (even better) js as a whole

>>109548352
>or (even better) js as a whole
all you need

>>109548352
>>109548370
How do you order pizza online without JS?

File: file.png (448 KB, 570x532)

448 KB PNG

>>109548562

>>109548580
The feds have had high speed cameras capable of extracting raw audio from can strings for over a decade now, if you're not encrypting your string transmissions you're just asking to get busted

>>109548562
I look up the number of the ristorante

File: brave.com_privacy-updates(...).png (551 KB, 1320x2868)

551 KB PNG

brave doesn't care about fingerprinting
https://brave.com/privacy-updates/28-sunsetting-strict-fingerprinting-mode/

>>109548704
Because their model is to try and make every single user have a randomized fingerprint, Firefox’s resist fingerprint setting works but not having a fingerprint is itself a fingerprint in the same way that Tor stands out.

>>109548298
LMAO no they don't.

File: Glowjak.jpg (141 KB, 604x601)

141 KB JPG

>>109548731
>NOOO YOUR FINGERPRINT CAN'T MATCH THAT OF EVERY OTHER USER

>>109548837
You literally get put on an INTERPOL watch list with those kind of jaks.

Who am I kidding, you are them.
kek

>>109548858
>Uhm ackhually if you are not defending Brendan 'I'm the creator of Javascript but now I totally care about your privacy and that's why I'm abandoning manifest v2' Eich you are a glowie

>>109548256
When you are running JavaScript it's pretty much game over on any browser and OS. Not all websites use the most advanced fingerprinting techniques, but any website that really wants to (or third party script loaded by your browser) can already fingerprint you with an extremely high level of accuracy.

>>109548298
There is no such thing as "protection" against this type of fingerprinting.
You either disable everything including canvas or you get fingerprinted.
It's that simple

File: hacktivis.me_articles_clo(...).png (766 KB, 1320x2868)

766 KB PNG

>>109548298
that never worked.
https://hacktivis.me/articles/cloudflare-turnstile-webgl-fingerprinting

>>109548887
nu-/g/'s reading comprehension at its finest

>>109548562
>order pizza online
Use a phone you tard

>>109548562
OH I FINALLY UNDERSTAND THESE POSTS
You guys are not actually talking about pizza.

>>109548256
Third parties looking to collect your personal data are no longer your biggest problem when you use Brave.
That's because the first part - the people who make your browser - are much more dangerous. No browser phones home more information than Brave. Except maybe for Edge.

File: .png (127 KB, 610x676)

127 KB PNG

>>109548904
the comparable feature landed only like half a year ago in firefox. this feature is not even enabled in strict mode because "websites do rely on it"
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1916271#c21

>>109548887
I love how almost every single part of Firefox is broken in a significant way and has been for more than a decade but they never bother to fix it.
What the fuck do they do with all the money they get from google and their VPN?

>>109548960
>Not even addressing what I said
Try harder, lion shill

>>109548883
Tor browser has it and it doesnt disable canvas usage, it tends to add loads of artifacts though. If there was a tor browser without needing to use tor i would use it just for that.

>>109549007
If there was a tor browser without needing to use tor i would use it just for that.
Mullvad browser? Alternatively hardened librewolf

>>109549007
Tor browser is absolutely useless without webgl, canvas and js disabled.
Every single onion website that even pretends to care about security tells you to disable JS

>>109549020
holy shit i didnt know mullvad made a browser
gonna switch right now

What's the beef with Brave and Firefox? Is it just Indian Trannies spazzing out? I've been using both and they work perfectly fine when configured.

>>109549058
It's basically just the Tor browser with some stuff removed but apparently both the Tor team and the Mullvad team are working on it

>>109549066
if you go to actual communities that exist around firefox like reddit and commie twitter you will see a ton of people who are still to this day butthurt about the donations the guy made that got him fired.

>>109549066
Brave tried to eat up ff's market share by marketing itself so heavily as a privacy browser despite the ceo of brave formerly being some top level manager in ff. Also absurd amounts of shilling just to increase BAT

>>109549172
only brave blocks ads by default. firefox doesn't care about your privacy.

>>109548256
>firefox+ublock origin.
Good, don't forget to disable some analytics in the settings. And if you are from the EU, enable both cookie checkboxes in UBO.

If you are too lazy for all of that shit, just install Librewolf.

>>109548256
>Is this real
do NOT check the payload of what sends when you have to post here from a fresh session

>>109548795 >>109548883 >>109548887
>i-it just is n-not true just trust me bro
Nobody will install your Brave MITM malware, doesn't matter that they pay you to advertise it here.

>>109549305
>By default
No, you need to toggle and even then it tries to push you into their BAT scam

File: .png (71 KB, 375x668)

71 KB PNG

>>109549375
no, ad blocking is opt-out. no need to toggle it on.

>>109549410
>Clearly shows that you need to enable brave shields
>Doesn't address being nudged to the BAT scam

>>109548298
>Firefox is good bro!
dude have you even used firefox in the last three years? It keeps getting worse and worse. The only way I can imagine firefox having protection against this is by the devs forgetting that it does (because if they remembered they would remove it with an update).

>>109549605
FIrefox has so much pozzed shit in their setting and hidden away that it requires a full on fork like Librewolf or mullvad browser to unpozz. It's on par with google chrome for the level of aids at this point.

>>109549664
>Least obvious samefag

>>109549664
Moztroons don't care about this. They just hate Brendan Eich.

>>109548256
yes block webgl in noscript

File: Settings.png (32 KB, 764x677)

32 KB PNG

>ctrl+f firefox
I just had it install an update after reboot even though I have automatic updates disabled. What the fuck? Does "choose when to install" mean "let us choose when to install"?

Watching Firefox vs Brave fight is like the cripple fight from South Park.

Meanwhile Vivaldi chads just sit and watch.