What happens to software copyright in the age of AI?There's no meaningful way in which your vibecoded slop can be considered your own, surely?Have legislators caught up?
>>109554342>Have legislators caught up?Do they ever?
Nobody should own any software.
>Have legislators caught up?Nah, they touch to many kids to keep up with that.Also, you shouldn't want that.
The US copyright office already set things in stone like 3 years ago for how it all works, but everyone ignored it because they didn't like the answers and now everyone pretends it's all perpetually vague and undecided upon and the lawsuits are going to be here any second now!
>>109554385please elaborate
>>109554342>>109554369it is possible that the courts will decide that the aislop companies have the rights to what they generateapparently were in a process of deciding the liability questionand thats problematic because liability implies a concept of ownershiphttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OunJtLnyPT4
>>109554342>There's no meaningful way in which your vibecoded slop can be considered your own, surely?If you can press a button and own a picture then you can own AI code.Now fuck off.
>>109554403i smell fear, vibetrany
>>109554412I smell unemployment. Luddite.
>>109554342how can anyone prove you have vibecoded? are you showing people your raw code?
>>109554392https://copyright.gov/ai/
>>109554342software copyright is like bandits in the old times extorting money to cross a bridge, except they use the force of the state
>>109554416youre not equipped to make conclusions of any sort, vibetranyask your shatbot
>>109554403A camera, even digital, is not generating anything. This is a public FYI that most analogies are retarded reductionist trash.
>>109554437>A global business has global headquarters. By your logic Nintendo is an American company just because they have a U.S branch. Retarded dumbfuck.
>>109554452>A camera, even digital, is not generating anything.It absolutely is. Just look up white balance and demosaicing.
>>109554468>multi-category olympic champion of missing the pointi told you to ask your shatbot.your shoe size is a number larger than your iqit was a friendly advice
>>109554342Its the age of bespoke software. Whatever youre doing software wise, $ have to live in new features and updates, not general subscriptions. Ive used AI to bypass paywalls for peoples tools, and now have to accept whatever I make will be cracked also
>>109554488And I told you to fuck yourself.
>>109554500because you lost and youre seething, vibetranyhow delectable
if ai is just regurgitating whatever is in its databases it ripped from github and the like, how isnt it constantly violating the license agreements of those various projects?
>>109554516it does.its just that artfags are poor and irrelevant
>>109554516also if your shit is on githoob, youre literally asking for it100% deservedthe writing was on the wall from the second it was known m$ft was gonna acquire the platform
>>109554516Debunked.
>>109554571>haha, look at these people angry about losing their ability to put food on the tableand the best part>haha capitalismthe absolute iq of vibetranies
>>109554342everything is also effectively open source now, since ai can reverse basically anything in a week.
>>109554494for most software, cracking it wasn't that difficult to begin with. that's why everything moved to saas cloudshit. the new question is why would anyone pay for your saas cloudshit, when they can vibecode the same functionality.>>109554571we're talking about software here. how can you say you have copyright over something you didn't write?
>>109554342>>109554516nobody ever gave a fuck about your cuck licenses.if you post your code on the internet it's free real estate.
>>109554646you're fundamentally misunderstanding the question.you closed source fags just lost all rights to your software because you didn't write it, Anthropic did.
>>109554680damn, if only there was something about this in the terms of service. oh wait, there is.>As between the parties and to the extent permitted by applicable law, Anthropic agrees that Customer (a) retains all rights to its Inputs, and (b) owns its Outputs. Anthropic disclaims any rights it receives to the Customer Content under these Terms. Subject to Customer’s compliance with these Terms, Anthropic hereby assigns to Customer its right, title and interest (if any) in and to Outputs. Anthropic may not train models on Customer Content from Services. “Inputs” means submissions to the Services by Customer or its Users and “Outputs” means responses generated by the Services to Inputs (Inputs and Outputs together are “Customer Content”).
>>109554516in a sense it is but no court is going to judge them harshly for it too much money riding on this baby they will just let it limbo. If you however dare to pirate something you will experience the full might of the US.
>>109554594>haha, look at these people angry about losing their ability to put food on the tableThen go apply for a new fucking job.There's a huge shortage of farm labour. Tons of work exists if you're not lazy.
>>109554342If a company owns the code its employees write, then I own the code my clankers write. Simple.
>>109554772You know that flies in the bin after the IPO.
>>109554792>just submit to our corporat overlords, operating outside the law anywaysgiven youre retadred and impotent it makes perfect sense why you cozy up to big corpo
>>109554342>There's no meaningful way in which your vibecoded slop can be considered your own, surely?nigger who the fuck caresmuh software copyright has always been a meme. if you publish it I'm taking your shit. if you don't publish it i'm reverse engineering it.yes i would download a car
>>109554862no way someone who's capable of RE cant understand the basic legal implications of that shiti call LARP/summerfaggotry
>>109554883the legal implications are irrelevant because the legal system works for the richer party. (you) pirating movies is bad because riaa/mpaa is stronger so you pay fines.ai companies pirating shit is fine because they're the stronger party than some random software shop or some bullshit license on githubthe legal implications is that license washing is necessary for US ai models to work, and codeslop generation is responsible for a good chunk of US ai labs' funding. destroying this would destroy the labs, which are deemed of importance by US government, so it will never happen
>>109554921>still missing the pointsince youre an annoying know-it-all cunt, ill leave you to read the thread instead of spoonfeeding you
>>109554452You know there is no such thing as raw image right? Its all processed by the device
>>109554403The art in photography comes from manually manipulating the output to look more aesthetic than it naturally was
>>109554772you know they can just revoke that at any time, right?
>>109554998No, the art in photography is positioning the device in the right place at the right time. The editing is there to enhance the effect.
>>109554792Nigga, how are you going to get neetgibs when the tax money boseeives because all people can do is low pay labor? 1/4 salary means 1/4 to tax.
>>109554342>What happens to software copyright in the age of AI?Same shit that happens now>There's no meaningful way in which your vibecoded slop can be considered your own, surely?Same as today, individuals? No. Lobbing companies? Most definitely yes. >Have legislators caught up?As always, no, and they never will.
>>109554601Could you show me some examples of AI reversing and fully recreating some real software in a week?
>>109554815>>109555046two more weeks
>>109555097Rich people pay more in taxes than poor people.
>>109554998AI art does the same thing.>First output is generic, so you modify and iterate until it's perfect.
>>109555466Lmao. They pay proportionally less. If a regular person pays, say, 40% and a rich bozo pays maybe 10%, what do you think happens when 40%gger cumulative earnings drops? It's gonna be less tax bux in the vault. Neets go down with everyone else.
>>109555433There's debt to pay.
>>109555235GTA San Andreas
>>109555716post link
>>109555730I'm already spoonfeeding you more than you deserve, you'll have to use the googles by yourself.
>>109555748ok, so it didnt happenget lost, vibetrany
>>109555752I accept your concession
>>109555793>consneeds>"i accept your concession"ask your shatbot to explain the term to you, vibetrany illiterate
>>109555804your refusal to google when spoonfed constitutes your concession. no amount of wordceling can backtrack you out of it. but that's ok because I accept it.
>>109555837thats also not what spoonfeeding meansyou really have issues with vocabulary, vibetrany illiteratemaybe youre just mentally handicapped...
>>109555858yes it is, lol. you need more?
>>109554342The legislators are 90 year old pedophiles who rely on bribes from corporations. Those retards are worse than useless
>>109555921no fanksthe delay in my reply should be token of just how little im interested in a discussion with a vibetrany illiterate
>>109556233nah, it just means you ran out of copes. we can all see that much senpai.
>>109556253>cope (noun)another thing you should ask your shatbot to explain to youllms are pretty good at these thingsyou should try em
>>109556264don't drop your cope on the way out
>>109556288i have none to dropi exist beyond your noise, and that of javascript codemonkeysi just like to dunk on you bc youre evil
>>109554403Easy one.It's obviously the flash on the camera.
>>109556350you've once again outed yourself as my inferior, so I'll accept your concession for the third time.you better go back to your java faggotry, you cuck boy.
>>109556477>paitonok, opinion discardedidek what youre showing to mefukken numpy or smt?i write them numpies in case you didnt understand what im saying to youand what i have shown is a simplification of opencl from 100 locs boilerplate to... err... 5.i didnt show complex stuffi have shown craftsmanship in how to reduce complexity.im ultra and youre fuckken nihilit is what it is.ill keep doing my shit and youll keep doing... nothing
>>109556544I mean, the fact that the word "python" is the only thing you recognized from that screenshot tells me all that I need to know :D
>>109556598i stopped reading at that point to be honesti could build pythonyou could suck penis and swallow cumthats the difference bw us both, vibetrany
>>109554486for the last time, post processing is not generative and this retarded attempt at pretending is never going to work.
>>109555476the only people who enjoy ai art is the faggot that pressed generate. said faggot doesnt even like other ai art, only the slop they generate
>>109554516These aren't your projects, they are ours.
>>109554883even if he's not reverse engineering your shit, the chinese surely are and their laws protect them
>>109555716The most complete reversing project for that I found was https://github.com/gta-reversed/gta-reversed. It's not finished and it doesn't even seem to be AI generated as it has been in development for over five years. Any other examples?
If I vibeslop a video and upload it to YouTube, will it get inundated by endless Content ID claims? That is something that everyone should consider, before they just plop a one-shot prompt into Sora.
>>109555466Yeah, because rich people have hoarded so much wealth that whatever they pay in taxes is more than whay the rest of the population can afford to pay without literally dying. Looked at another way: if wealth was perfectly equally distributed, everyone would contribute the same.Besides, rich people have so much that giving away the vast majority doesn't meaningfully change their quality of life. If a billionaire was taxed 90% out of his wealth as a one off, he'd still have a hundred millions at minimum, which functionally means he'd still be obscenely rich. If anyone like the vast majority of people here (statistically), that barely manages to save a few hundreds a month gets taxed any % more, it's probable he won't make ends meet.That propaganda line of yours isn't the own you think it is.
>>109554772Anthropic can absolutely throw that into a garbage bin but right now and in the near future (say at least a year or two) they will not. Their current business model requires their consumers to have a faith in the product. If the users were to believe , that they can not own the code and therefore can not commercialize it, they wouldn't be paying for subscriptions, especially for the higher tier ones and clearly will not continue, when Anthropic raises prices. And being a startup company , they need a good public image and lots of goodwill. There's reason Google kept "don't be evil" motto for so long.But understanding this, requires a brain not composed of vibe-matter. And since you are lacking one, you end up like this >>109555433Anons >>109554815 and >>109555046, are absolutely right. Promises made, don't matter. They can be broken without being held.
>>109554792AI will take this as well.
>>109554516What's Timmy gonna do about it, eh?
>>109554342As usual, IP will be used as a tool by rich corporations with the resources to work the system. The details will change, I don't really know or care how.
>>109554504>shatbotkek
