[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1781221302357623.png (125 KB, 493x402)
125 KB PNG
At this point, not a single Linux distribution uses XLibre. But we don't care. We can't stop winning.
Long live XLibre! See you in 5 years!
>>
why do trannies still give a shit about raiding this dead website
>>
don't care, xorg is comfy, wayland is broken, xlibre who?
>>
File: 1764720370443975.jpg (26 KB, 620x349)
26 KB JPG
>>109567022
>not a single Linux distribution uses XLibre
https://xcancel.com/acreetionos/status/2080704046235807984
>>
File: 1774303562707809.png (35 KB, 1092x151)
35 KB PNG
>>109567097
https://xcancel.com/acreetionos/status/2081039756927135927
LOL. LMAO EVEN.
>>
>>109567054
Xorg is officially deorecated, hence XLibre, its continuation.
>>
>>109567032
All these anti xlibre threads remind me of a screenshot I saw of a thread on an altchan everyone moved to when 4chan went down. Basically, a certain board had been having a problem where the same thread was being spammed with the same replies. When they moved to the alt board the spammer tried doing the same thing but there IDs were enabled and everyone could see the post and all the replies were from the same person. It took him about 10 posts to realize this and he deleted all his posts shortly after. Has anyone got the screenshot? I'm pretty sure it was posted on /g/, it was genuinely the funniest shit I'd ever seen on this site
>>
>>109567022
Imagine caring about this shit. Not sure who the biggest faggots are, you guys or the browser fags.
>>
>>109567210
I just operate under the assumption that most posts on imageboards are paid content. Especially all the AI slop promoting garbage.
>>
File: 1755755661598227.jpg (43 KB, 618x593)
43 KB JPG
>>109567097
Read again: https://xcancel.com/acreetionos/status/2088597868965953700
They're not so stupid as to only ship XLibre, especially after what happened to Artix.
>>
File: 1759595026958650.jpg (43 KB, 860x574)
43 KB JPG
>>109567022
now
>>
>>109567210
>>109567235
i mean this website is half the traffic, 40% of the rest is 3rd world and 40% is bots either tranny or glownigger
it's all so tiresome, i dont have anywhere to go
>>
>>109567156
>>109567210
>>109567235
sametangofag, if xe only spent half this time to fix broken xlibre stuff
>>
>>109567397
Dude, 1. xlibre is unfixable and 2. he's the main reason xlibre won't get adopted or dropped out of favor
>>
File: 1767491895444876.png (246 KB, 1391x706)
246 KB PNG
>>109567032
>calls out trannies
>bans anti-troon users
>>
File: 1762938261888987.jpg (40 KB, 460x460)
40 KB JPG
>>109567097
>>109567142
this has approximately 40% chances of not going well: https://github.com/spivanatalie64
>>
File: 1778638219473104.png (72 KB, 800x800)
72 KB PNG
>>109567022
>not a single Linux distribution uses XLibre
Delusional lying schizo, it's default in Artix
>>
File: 1781687710438005.jpg (20 KB, 407x428)
20 KB JPG
>>109567529
>40%
Still better than Xlibre
>>
>>109567529
>AcreetionOS
what the fuck sort of name is that.
does he really mean "A Cretin OS".
>>
File: sad_cat.jpg (57 KB, 510x510)
57 KB JPG
>>109567553
>it's default in Artix
was, that's why (you) missed the quads
check their news
>>
File: 9FF81-324ACF-98BA98E.png (181 KB, 360x395)
181 KB PNG
>>109567681
>>
File: xlibre-bugs.png (382 KB, 1456x1446)
382 KB PNG
>>109567681
well, i guess it was to be expected. at least they're still packaging it.
>>
>>109567681
xlibre is still in the artix repos.
In my opinion the artix team should do what arch does and just supply a base iso and maybe a bootstrap tar archive, with the possibility of a cli install script.
Concentrate on 1 init, openrc because it just works and has done for a very long time.
They create more work for themselves than needed.
>>
>>109567054
>xorg is comfy
maybe with old packages but now everything defaults to wayland and you have to go out of your way to make some programs run smoothly
>>
>>109567681
I for one won't miss it a moment, broke my X on intel igpu.
>>109567740
>denial
>anger
>bargaining <== you are here
>depression
>acceptance
They do supply base isos, the point is to provide a real working iso with xlibre because lots of people wanted to try it out of curiosity. I did, for some time.
I think xlibre fucked this one up royally >>109567719 and I read some of the drama on artix forums betwen some xlibre guy and artix devs - he really pissed them off.
>>
>>109567788
>drama on artix forums
QRD?
>>
>>109567022
Both are obsolete. Lol.
>>
>>109567788
>The drama on artix forums
It was hardly a drama, more of a disagreement.
The only drama involved are the peanuts like you making it into one.
>>
>>109567797
Artix released official isos with xlibre, because of largish userbase xlibre got run on lots of hardware, broke on some, lots of bug reports, artix switched to xorg 1-2 months later, the xlibre dude demanded explanations and proof of breakage (duh) , threatened artix with bad publicity and was told to fuck off.
>>109567830
>disagreement
Yeah, right, don't make me search the thread.
>>
>>109567857
>Yeah, right, don't make me search the thread.
put up or shut up
>>
>>109567857
>search *for* the thread
I'm dummy
>>
File: fuck-off.png (142 KB, 1245x705)
142 KB PNG
>>109567867
There fren:
https://forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,9764.0.html
Re-reading the thread, it was actually worse - that callmetango dude did everything he could to get artix mad at xlibre instead of trying to calm things down. I mean, artix gave them a big break, they blew it and he thought it was personal or something. If I had such a bridge-burning employee in my company, I'd terminate him for cause.
Shame, because burnt bridges won't build back easily.
>>
>>109567971
Jesus Christ, callmetango is worse than a DEI hire.
>>
>>109567681
>check their news
https://artixlinux.org/news.php#Official_ISO_release_2026-08
>- The default X server is again Xorg; XLibre is still packaged and available for installation.
>>109567998
>>109567971
tango should neck himself, if any sanity is left in xlibre they should kick him out asap after making him apologize
>>
>>109567971
https://forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,9764.msg60989.html#msg60989
>"how dare you not use xlibre for your isos?"
https://forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,9764.msg61044.html#msg61044
>"say it's not our fault and apologize!"
Satan loves ingrates.
>>
>>109568041
>tango should neck himself, if any sanity is left in xlibre they should kick him out asap after making him apologize
perhaps they're all of the same kind, but i do have a faint hope they aren't and they'll do the right thing
>>
>>109567971
No way, no, no man can be this ungrateful. I refuse to believe XLibre allows such a person to speak or right on behalf of them. I wish Artix stops even packaging this abomination.
>>
>>109567971
xlibre xisters fear not, we still have secreetion os
>>
File: pepe-considers.png (243 KB, 1200x1200)
243 KB PNG
>>109567830
>hardly a drama
Dude, I think that right there >>109567971 was your one way ticket to oblivion. Hardly a drama, indeed.
>>
What's so bad about wayland?
>>
>>109567971
>https://forum.artixlinux.org/index.php/topic,9764.0.html
Wait, the xlibre dev referred to the artix dev, who did the xlibre packaging no less, as "the individual that calls himself 'artist'", on the artix forum? Is he a retard or just vaxxed?
>>
Xlibre never worked right for me on Plasma nor SonicDE on Artix. Artix devs made a mistake by adopting it as their default so early and seeing how uppity >>109568083 the Xlibre dude has gotten I think it's the best decision to drop it for now.
>>
>>109567507
>Xlibre mods complaining about "manospehere"
Yep, seems about right. Exactly the type of person who would use that.
>>
>>109567971
delet dis
>>
>retard or just vaxxed?
That level of conceit warrants both.
>>
>>109567971
Are cmtango and callmetango the same person? Why has he got two accounts? Also NGL that nous dude seems like a chad
>>
>>109569750
apparently the same
>>
>>109567971
>>109568354
All callmetango had to do was not act like an entitled faggot, I bet Artix would return to Xlibre once it stabilized. But noooo, he had to show everyone what a massive faggot looks like and took Xlibre down with him. Give him the boot.
>>
>>109567971
There's more drama in the telegram/xlibre/distributions subchannel, July 24 onwards. The dick called tango demanded a public apology *after* he had banned the Artix dev who did the Xlibre packaging and shat on him and Artix on Twitter/X.
I'm sending an email to Artix, if they bring Xlibre back I'm leaving on general principle.
>>
>>109567529
>trans republican
What a cringe rabbit hole. I want my 5 minutes of time back
>>
>>109568195
what's so good about it?
>>
>>109570356
at least post link faggot ffs
starts at https://t.me/x11dev/13008/221573
>>
>>109567022
Why don't they just contribute back to xorg instead of keeping their special sekrit club? Are they stupid?
>>
File: 1779385584680694.jpg (18 KB, 600x434)
18 KB JPG
>>109570713
>shit on the only distro that supported them
>Are they stupid?
What's even more stupid is tango still being with xlibre
>>
File: syslog screenshot.png (87 KB, 1069x245)
87 KB PNG
One issue I've been having with xlibre is the syslog entries are all malformed. Is this problem unique to xlibre or was it carried over from xorg and they just haven't got round to fixing it yet?
>>
>>109570713
thats not what happened at all, the xlibre guy got kicked out so he had to fork
>>
>>109567971
Whoa, xlibre dug its own grave and tango provided the shovel
>>
>>109570943
Switch to Xorg and see for yourself but my money is on some Xlibre fuckup, again.
>>
>>109571367
That's fair. I've never actually used xorg before. Is there anything else I need to change other than manually enabling TearFree?
>>
>>109571367
>>109571540
Never mind, just found out that TearFree is enabled by default on xorg for the modesetting driver, which I use. Turns out xlibre really was just snake oil.
>>
>>109571850
Artix packages xorg-server-tearfree, w/ enabled tearfree for all drivers.
>>
File: 1781784968008204.png (1.83 MB, 1500x1544)
1.83 MB PNG
>>109567971
>xlibre has won
>>
>>109572287
The more they ignore us the more we win, chud
>>
This is just Xfree86 vs Xorg all over again. So many people that weren't around for that drama.
>>
>>109567022
>Xorg Lost. XLibre won.
>not a single Linux distribution uses XLibre
I think you are very confused. You don't see the contradiction between your own words, do you? I think you're trying to sound smart. I know you have achieved the opposite. Please stop posting.
>>
>>109572847
the sense of sarcasm is lacking in this one.
>>
File: 1775226921577951.jpg (61 KB, 525x809)
61 KB JPG
>>109567971
Xlibre managed to make the only distro worth mentioning and supported them run away full speed.
>>
>>109571850 (me)
Ok so TearFree is not enabled by default on the latest release of xorg, so I guess I'll see exactly what this setting was doing and what I'm missing without it. I can confirm though that the syslog issue in >>109570943 was being caused by xlibre and xorg doesn't write to syslog at all, but that's ok because the actual log is in .local/share/xorg/Xorg.0.log, and I was actually looking for a way to disable syslog logging in xlibre. Also xorg seems to start up pretty quickly when I run startx, whereas xlibre would hang for a few seconds
>>
>>109568211
>Is he a retard or just vaxxed?
Are you developmentally challenged or just Russian?
>>
>>109567156
> is officially deorecated
Says who?
Sounds like we shouldn’t have the ones who declared it deprecated working on it anyway.
It was never theirs to begin with.
>>
>>109573043
>>109572847
Callmetango has entered the thread. Brace yourselves for lots of gaslighting, astroturfing and crying.
>>
>>109573202
I just think it's really organic how you worked that subject into a completely unrelated argument. You must be the queen rooster at the call center.
>>
>>109567971
It's so final it hurts. If tango had half a testicle he'd apologize and resign.
>>
It's official, xlibre ded.
>>
File: 1757268968232016.jpg (39 KB, 640x640)
39 KB JPG
>>109567971
>>109573548
do you think xlibre got the message? is tango still with them?
>>
>>109567681
shit, I was just about to switch over to Artix because I wanted my X11 DE to have XLibre. I really love how there was such a big deal made about Artix defaulting to XL but I heard absolutely nothing about the reversion back to basic XO. vanilla Arch it is, then.
>>
>>109567022
Doesn't Troonduke OS use Xlibre?
>>
File: 1777727083843489.jpg (77 KB, 683x1024)
77 KB JPG
>>109567971
The real question is how xlibre still has that DEI hire tango onboard, imagine posting somewhere "xlibre broke, switching to xorg" and having tango demanding you prove it was xlibre's fault, lol.
>>
>>109567142
What in the god damn fuck compels people to post shit like this much less do it on a public project account?
>>
File: 1782009457338870.jpg (52 KB, 960x960)
52 KB JPG
>>109570356
>you both owe a lot of people an apology
>officially
>in public
this flaming faggot thinks owns everyone
>>
>>109567971
>>109573548
Owari da
>>
>>109568211
>vaxxed
How did a jab mindbreak you so badly
>>
>>109568195
No circular scrolling
>>
>>109569750
>Also NGL that nous dude seems like a chad
he's the guy who dropped that famous "you will never be a woman" on the Artix forums. he's an actual chad
anyway, guess I'll have to switch back to Xorg tomorrow
>>
My system is pretty minimal now, gnu toolchain glibc, libx11, mesa, motif, xlibre and emwm. Ive built the new wow64 wine and added dxvk for gaymen. No multilib, no systemd no seatd or whatever, no dbus or rust! I am running the browser in an alpine vm which is comfy otherwise id have to work out how to build chromium with no rust or gtk / qt.
>>
Xlibre broke for me, good riddance
>>
File: nous.png (52 KB, 1563x350)
52 KB PNG
>>109576676
And this one.
>>
>>109574119
I guess they all drink from the same piss
>>
>>109574050
We're talking distros with over 20 users.
>>
>>109567294
What exactly happened? I run Artix and my display server stopped working for a couple days.
>>
>>109568195
All my X apps are slow, my WM doesn't work, and there's nothing it does well.
>>
>>109573982
It happened so fast I don't think most people are aware yet. All I knew is that my display server broke a few days ago when I updated and started working again when I updated yesterday. I didn't realize they switched back to Xorg until I read this thread.
>>
>>109578333
Are you on Xlibre or Xorg? The switch doesn't happen with a simple update, it must be done manually by the user. What happened is the new Artix ISOs come with Xorg now, but that doesn't affect existing users.
>>
>>109573548
The world is healing
>>
>>109567797
>>109567857
Thanks
>>
>>109573548
rip
>>
>>109572994 (me again)
Turns out I don't need TearFree if I use picom as that basically does the same thing (rendering in a separate buffer before writing to the screen). However there are an alarming number of commits that have been made to the master branch of xorg that haven't made it into the stable releases. Learning this makes me wish even more that xlibre had succeeded. Oh well. If only the development wasn't being headed by a literal sperg(s). At least Micay doesn't go around flaming people for not using grapheneos
>>
>>109578353
>It happened so fast
you changed you passion for glory
>>
File: 1773362192969295.jpg (267 KB, 1389x944)
267 KB JPG
>>109573548
>>109567719
>>109567971
At long last, those xlibre faggots haven't stopped declaring xorg dead.
>>
File: 1760955091784919.png (1.02 MB, 887x595)
1.02 MB PNG
>>109573548
>>
oh noes, what will happen of us xlibre xisters?
>>
>>109568083
what an insufferable faggot, tell me he got banned please



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.