What do you think about CloudFlare, anon?
even the logo has that nose shapecrookflare, not being subtle at all
>>109570189It's fine if you don't mind all your data going through them.Besides that it's a CDN, so not that exciting.
pushing stupid ECH which makes protocol mix, the mix breaks the separation of concerns principle, HTTP becomes dependant on DNS. cucks in RFC and other committees are suppose to guard public sanity from such stuff but they gladly allow their asses to be fucked by cloud sugar daddyi dispise GNUtards, academia and spec writers more than to network racketeers
For the last 15 years SWE is only about creating problems and selling the "solution", but in this case, it doesn't solve the root of the problem, nor does it even cure the symptoms.
>>109570189cheap domains cloudflare tunnels are godsend when dealing with retarded ISPs