>>109585810Who sold you that useless brick?
>>109585810Bin Laden's trust worthy
what, your autism? trust me, it's not.
>>109585810I have one but I wouldn't call it sexy.
>nippon makes watches with battery life rated for year>fruit company makes watches with battery life rated for 24 hours and needs regular recharging
>>109585810>Polyurethane, chemical leaking band that causes contact dermatitisYeah. Imma pass
>>109585810It just is.It didn't do anything new at all, but that Ryuusuke Moriai guy created a perfect mix from design elements of the earlier similar models.I really really wish there was a version/similar model with a countdown timer. W-202 just doesn't do it for me visually, plus I heard about it getting fucked by moisture 3 too many times, even though it's rated by Casio as more water resistant than F-91W.
>>109586152The F-B100W may be coming to more markets soon. So far it's only available in the UK but it's basically the ABL-100 with the F-91W look and strap.
>>109585810absolute
do you think Bin Laden took some watches to gift to Michael Jackson, Elvis and Hitler?
>>109586217tech endgame, very sexo
>>109585810
>>109586211I considered it, along with a bunch of other models (W-202, LF-20/30W, WS-1600, AE-1300, LWS-2200, GMD-/GLX-S5600).Ultimately yesterday I ordered a basic Square for a few practical and autistic reasons. Somewhat ironically, I'll wear it mostly at home and my F-91W mostly outside.
>>109586658I daily drive a GW-M5610U so I'm used to the square bulk. I'd be interested in the F-B100W though whenever it's available outside the UK. It's not ideal, it's "smart" features mostly suck and I prefer relying on DCF77 for time sync, but on the other hand it's like an F-91W with the types of modern Casio features and dial info that you'd expect.
Convince me to buy a Cassio g shock instead of a smartwatch
>>109586733Smartwatch:>a second smartphone for your wrist>will bombard you with notifications>will have to charge it every 1-2 days>a lot of extra problems to deal with for little good functionality>a second tracker for the feds that you now wear on your wristG-Shock:>will only do what you want a watch to do: timekeeping>Tough Solar+Multi Band 6 means it'll take care of itself>10 years minimum battery life>auto syncing and adjusting DST/leap year>can dive with it no problem>can slam it at the wall like it's nothingF-91W:>tough enough for every day use>waterproof enough for every day use>will have to manually adjust DST/leap time>and occasionally correct the second drift>dirt fucking cheap>has a few less features than a G-Shock but still serviceableAlso all Casios will always display the time, no need to wake it to look at the time like with those glorified mini-smartphones. If you want something that tells you time, you get a Casio. I got my first one in high school when I got tired of having to pull out my smartphone every time I wanted to check the time.
>>109586733How about no
>>109585810wrist size?
>>109586824My "wrist" is 10 inches long with the girth of a family sized can of Spaghetti O's Bitches scream>It's too big it's too big!!!It's a curse
>>109586092you are weak, my hands have went through stone and fire, my grip is firm, while you touch like a little faggot, you will never be a man
>>109585810it's small and tight, that's why
>>109587289Big and apple shaped is better
>>109585810i wore F-105W (the superior choice) for 20 years ama
>>109587301wrist size?
>>1095873177"
>>109585810>just werksFucking luxury.
I like it too, but we are the minority, and I don't use watch these days. Btw that's the watch that right-wing politicians in my country use to pass themselves as man of the people. lol
>>109585810Can we get someone to draw an F-91W-chan?
>>109585810didnt you get the memo? normalfags also wear these now so yeah basically your a faget
>>109587221Sound like you could rock the GX-56, AKA "The King". There are other big bois for big boi wrists as well.
>>109588742Oh yeah the GXW-56 is the better model with radio time sync, so if you live in the US that'd be WWVB you'd use.https://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/wwvbmonitor_e.cgi
>>109587523>I don't use watch these daysHow come?
>>109589223Because 1. I have a smartphone 2. I work from home and barely leave my house.
Can someone tell me if this is any good
>>109585810I like the OG but this one is the one to get all the girls.
>>109589443It shows the time/10
>>109585810Which current casio is similarly low key and won't get me put on a list for buying?
>>109585810how am i supposed to masturbate while looking at this screen?this is why apple watches are better
>>109586733not a g-shock but I bought an AE-1500 a month or so ago specifically because it *wasn't* a smart watch and I just wanted something to tell the timefrankly I never understood the appeal of smart watches; I feel like if you don't have easy access to your phone then you're probably doing something where you don't need the distraction anyway.
g shock chads have enetered the chat
g-shock is too thick to want to wear while on the computer.Thoughts ?>>109586733>Cassio g shockRequired no care or feeding.>>109589546>put on a listThat's the most sold model on amazon.>>109589581>how am i supposed to masturbate while looking at this screen?If you angle it just rightyou can see a reflection of your face.
>>109586733Aside from the fact they show time and have digital display there is nothing in common. G-shock can show date and time have stop watch and alarm. Some have more than that but all G-shocks have this. This is set and forget. If the model is multi band 6, solar and gave non resin band it will last 20 years, you will get tired of using it. Smart watch can do this and 100 other things but you have to charge it every 2-7 days depending on the model and the battery will crap itself in 5-6 years. G-shock is what watch is with its features, durability, accuracy and convenience (no servicing) taken to the extreme. Smart watch is small smartphone with fitness tracking you can put on your wrist. If you don't need the fitness functions get something else even if it not g-shock.
>>109589537its 58/10 you nigga
>>109585810>CASIO>MODEL#>WR>WATER RESIST(WR TWICE)>ALARM CHRONOGRAPH
I like this one, it's simple, subtle, and does just right :3
>>109585810>sexyWhat are you trying to say, retard? fucking moron
>>109589487This
>>109585810It's because it makes you reminisce of how much of a man your father was
>>109587274>have went
Am I the only one who'd be infuriated reading CASIO F-91W ALARM CHRONOGRAPH WATER WR RESIST when I want to know the fucking time?
>>109600329No, because most of us aren't autists that read everything around the watch face in order before reading the time.
>>109600329>Am I the only oneYes.I haven't heard of anyone that's been distracted by the dial when they wanted to read the time.
>>109600410>>109600460Over half of the clock is ADS. I typed out a whole argument but deleted because if my point isn't self-evident there's nothing else I can do.
>>109600492It's part of the charm, and again, if that bothers you then you must be autistic+OCD and every time you look at a watch you have to read every single line of text before reading the time.
>>109600492>I typed out a whole argument but deleted because if my point isn't self-evident there's nothing else I can do.I don't have that problem, so people having problems reading the time came across as completely unbelievable.>ADSFor casio, the colors and shit are considered part of the styling.Especially styling of that era.As your tastes are different what watches do you like?
>>109600522>what watches do you like?I don't need to know the time. Time is bloat. 90% of the times you look at a watch you don't get any actionable insight, watchfags are like addicts to me
why does it have all that tacky text on >water WR resistlooks like shit
>>109585810I started wearing one and losing weight and my female engineer coworker started flirting with me and taking lunch at the table right outside my office.Thats the power of casio, gents.
>>109585810the strap will melt in a few years. mine is now a pen holder's front bit. fuck that watch
This might be a retarded question but are there any dumbwatches with NTP sync? Analog or digital. I have a couple of watches I like but I don't wear them because it's a pain in the ass to manually adjust the time. I don't care if the battery life sucks, I don't wear my watches to sleep
>>109600987it can't be dumb and ntp
>>109600987get a solar watch with bluetooth time sync. you can filter casio by functions
>>109600987>NTP sync- bluetooth, offered on latest watches- multiband 6, atomic radio signal reception, but not available in some parts of the world- gps, offered on some watches
>>109592018>>109600329>>109600975Here, now shut the fuck up.It looks worse without all the text. The text is a part of the design, without it the face looks unbalanced.
It doesn't have to be text, but something needs to be there around the display for the design to really work.
>>109586217clean your keyboard, nigga
>>109601398>worsewhat? these are much better
>>109586211Why does it use bluetooth?
>>109586152>±15 sec. per monthIs this real? What's even the point of this trash? I wanna know what time it is, if I wanted some approximation I could just look up at the sky.
>>109601710To communicate your daily step count to the NSA.
>>109601806I'll pass, it's safer to just figure how long your path is your taking and just time yourself.
>>109601479that keyboard looks clean
>>109585810Why can't you enjoy a thing without having to promote it like a dumb social influencer? Do you need crap to feel belong to your imaginary group of friends? Are you validated because you buy the thing you saw on your favorite memeboard?I'm genuinely curious OP.BTW the board want you to take your time for your next scheduled post about Linux Mint, VLC and Thinkpad. The data shows it's better for market penetration (we figured that wasn't your most proficient skill).
>>109602131>complains about the thread being a waste of time>bumps it anyway$0.04 has been deposited in your account
>>109602144Not about a waste of time, about the intent.
>>109586092is casio PU ? I don't think so.
>>109601710Time sync, configuring the watch from your phone, step tracker. It's not a smartwatch by any stretch of imagination. There's no GPS, pulse meter, or anything that could be used to gather more data. Just a basic bitch accelerometer that's optional.
For me it's the F-84W (with sensorwatch board tho that's unnecessary). Just think the strap and no sticky-out things around the buttons looks better
>>109603272The old school "Lithium" and beeper logo make it so much more sex
the little strap on mine broke, RIP. A replacement strap + the tool needed to replace it is probably the price of a new F91W
>>109603879>replacement strap + the toolAnything useful on aliexpress?
>>109603879It's a standardized watch strap and mount, you can easily get a material or leather one as long as it's an 18mm one.
>>109603879The strap is 4$ the tool is 2$. https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005012933836212.html?pdp_ext_f=%7B%22order%22%3A%221%22%2C%22eval%22%3A%221%22%2C%22fromPage%22%3A%22search%22%7Dhttps://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005006001671048.html?pdp_ext_f=%7B%22order%22%3A%226114%22%2C%22spu_best_type%22%3A%22price%22%2C%22eval%22%3A%221%22%2C%22fromPage%22%3A%22search%22%7D
>>109600987Like other anons said, bluetooth enabled Casios can do it.And now there's even a web app that can do it for you, so you don't even need anything on your phone.https://gshock.avmedia.org/
I got a cheap SKMEI. Love it
>shits on your f-91
>this threadback to /fa/
>>109585810Fake>>109586217Real
>>109603272Nice. How about a sensorwatch'd W-31? Here's mine.
>>109605761>u
I wear my F-91W on one wrirst and my apple watch on the other. I like classic watches but I still need all that recorded data shit.
I'm getting a nato nylon strap for my one since I dislike how moisture builds up under the watch
>>109605957If it's not an Illuminator, it's shit.
>>109586658I wore the F91 for a while and eventually got a 5600, don't really touch the F91 anymoreAlso wear a MRW-200H regularly. I have some other, costlier watches, but those are more depending on a nicer occasion. Day to day it's usually the 5600 or MRW200H>>109586733Smart watch is annoying tech. Want another thing buzzing at you that you need to charge? No thanks. At some point I need less tech, not more.G-Shock (let's assume the basic G-Shock 5600) has more features than the F-91W but it's not exactly a Swiss Army knife, either.The F-91W isn't exactly fragile, but the G-Shock will take anything you could throw at it. Personally I think it looks better too.
>>109585810Best watch desu :)I don't even wear my G-Shocks anymore, and I have a Stainless GMWB5000D-1. Had this thing for more than a decade and the battery is still going strong.
>>109601801Pretty much every cheap quartz watch is rated to +-15 seconds a month.
>>109610056So what the fuck are my cat feeders using that one is 2 minutes fast and the other is 2 minutes slow every 2 weeks.
>>109605522Ugly desu
>>109605522nice to always know what year it is
