>You think of a random movie or clip without searching it or mentioning it in a chat>YT literally suggest it the same dayThis happens too often to be coincidental>inb4 schizo
>>109597569its LLMits can predict (You)
>>109597569It's called synchronicity, anon. It's the proof that CTMU is not just a theory.
>>109597594fpbp /threadThese algorithms have unironically become so good in some cases they can come to the same exact conclusions you do likely for the same exact reasons. i.e.>you see something (a video, an article, a website, whatever) that's tracked>YT algo directly feeds on it>accurately predicts user x seeing y will lead them to think about z later because of association wWelcome to the brave new world guys.
>>109597569you think your mind is unique? that your train of thought can't be engineered and guided? that you're so mysterious that you can't be read?They know more about you than you do about yourself
>thought recommendations thread>immediate predictive algorithm explanation replies>well that wraps up the topic>>109597635>that your train of thought can't be engineered and guided?Not to this degree of consistency this degree of accuracy.Anyone with half a brain would realize that remote mind reading is the more likely explanation. But implying that is strictly forbidden.
>>109597594You know i wanted to say bs but i thought about it for a sec and honestly youre probably right and we know these llms have been around longer than we've been aware of
>>109597569Have you had any tooth extractions? If so, when?
>>109597744>Not to this degree of consistency this degree of accuracy.Why not?Facebook already made a distinction that anyone who likes Pepsi over Cola has higher likelihood of being bipolar or schizophrenic back in early 2010sThey even successfully modified local town elections in US by suggesting more of left leaning friend postsYou do not think that a good combination of words, videos and data can't guide you to think or act a certain way? If you had enough of a self awareness you would come to realization that most of your thoughts aren't yours to begin with, they're just some book or quote or someones video analysis on the topic that you paraphrased and took upon as your own Now tell me honestly, when was the last time you had an original thought?
when anon starts posting my thoughts
>>109597917I should have specified I'm not OP and I'm not basing my claim on pre-defined youtube recommendations but from a litany of oddly specific recommendations across a multitude of websites.Again, no, not to the degree of my experiences. Original thoughts? It's about oddly specific and random thoughts.
>>109597635OP here. I just thought of Whiplash, a movie i haven't seen or talked about in years. I'm washing the dishes, phone is in another room, i'm thinking about the "rushing or strolling" scene, just recalling it in my head. Opened yt two hours laters, suggestions shows a thumbnail with the exact fucking scene. wtf HOW?
>>109597569have you considered all of the variables that led you to thinking about that thinghave you considered that the subject of your thoughts is not something that you can control?
>>109598110My point is something this random and arbitrary can't be calculated and to this level of precision (two hours range). Sure, it's not happening daily but it happened way too many times for it to be coincidental. Either we live in a simulation or my wifi router scans my thoughts
>>109597635>Namefagging in 2026
>>109597569I was listening Ecco the Dolphin's OST 2 days ago, then I opened the orange site and there was a link to an article about Ecco the Dolphin.
>>109598437....my point is that it's not random and arbitrary. you thought about it for a reason. since your phone can't read your thoughts yet, you VERY OBVIOUSLY were influenced to think about it by something else that you saw recently. which VERY OBVIOUSLY is the same reason why you got the ad or whatever.like really can you fucking retards even use your brains anymore?
>>109598490>you VERY OBVIOUSLY were influenced to think about it by something else that you saw recentlyYou don't know that.
besides the kike falseflagging in this thread and trying to make everyone else sound schizo and not him, they are making the audio spying WAY more blatant these days. I have normie friends on their phones pointing out youtube recommendations they get for topics they were just suggested on normiebook and reddit within literal seconds of flipping between the app tabs.also despite my best OPSEC practices i still get 4chan thread themed youtube recommendations here and there. games i've never played nor care to but saw a thread of now suddenly pops up heavily in my recommendations, etc. They're just being more bold now because nobody cares anymore.
>>109597569if only this existed for old 4chan posts i try to find
>>109598673ya i do bc i'm smart
>>109598490>Influenced to think about 2014 oscarbait because... ??And a magical algo somehow predicted this exact thought at the exact right time?SCIENCE AMIRITE HAHA
>>109598882low IQ retards really can't read huhif you think i said anything about any algorithm making any predictions, you are just dumb
see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion
>>109599019tldr: some people suffer bizarre rng of not discovering something until 30 years later
>>109599038thanks tldr-kun
>>109598882It wasn't even an ad, just a youtube suggestion to keep me engaged. Again, i did not verbalize this thought or searched for it on any device. What are the odds?
>>109599019Sounds like gaslighting.
>>109597744>Not to this degree of consistency this degree of accuracy.Except you only notice it when it is this accurate, you don't realize that the algorithm was trying to do the same thing with the other dozen videos it recommended to you on the front page after time you visited the site. Only when it does accurately predict your thoughts do you realize how much of a normie brain you are.
>>109599150Wrong, I accounted for that as well.Still far too accurate.
>>109599160Except, why were you thinking of a random movie clip in the first place? You have a certain set of subscriptions, interests, you are in a certain demographic, you have probably watched certain movies. You might have been looking at clips from other movies that have the same actors, directors, or producers, or studios, etc. So you think its unrelated to everything else, but the fact that you are interested in movies in the first place, is the biggest vector into your mind that the algorithm has to exploit you.And youtube movie or tv clips are one of the most popular forms of content the algorithm is pushing to everyone lately, its a form of advertising.And how often do you spend thinking about movies each day?The fact that coincidentially they triggered the neurons to make you think of a clip, by presenting associated information, and then they present the clip itself, is not a coincidence at all. The algorithm is not only trying to predict what you like, its trying to influence you to liking corporate products. Youtube makes its revenue from advertising, do you think that is only from ads? No, its also the content that they want you to watch. They are trying to do this to you all the time. And its not just the content that they want you to watch, to make them money. They also push specific content to push social and political agendas. So its not some great mystery or secret that a normie brain inundated with propoganda will inevitably think about the propanda the system is implanting. Your brain isn't only responding to the things you see, its also trying to predict what you will encounter, so it works both ways. The algorithm is trying to predict you, and you are trying to predict the algorithm, essentially your subconscious has been mated or pair bonded to digital algorithms.
>>109599225I don't see that as probable reason when I was recommended an obscure 3D animation of a very arbitrary mechanism that closely resembled something from my personal thought experiment.
>>109597569I had this happening for 15 years nowsometimes I think of something like "I haven't seen that cat meme in a while" and then within a few days I come across itwhat does this mean? am I influencing the fate with my thoughts?
>>109599150>>109599225Again, I should have specified your replies are not to OP.
heh. I am too funny and random to predict.
>disable watch history>ublock recommendation divs
niggas REALLY think google can read your mind but won't stop using google products
