[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_2973.png (37 KB, 743x413)
37 KB PNG
Should contemporary law respect people’s rights over their data and how such data is distributed, analysed, produced, or stored?
>>
>>109600961
No.
>>
>>109600961
Obviously not. All "private data" is in reality fully licit time-and-place information.
>>
>>109600961
some of it shouldn't be collected in the first place
>>
>>109600961
Reminds me, Microsoft new EULA, claims they have global royaltee free rights to your data.
Ofcourse if you actually patented your data, they woud not.
It's simply your private data, as a person.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.