Let me get this straight. We're about to solve scarcity but you guys want to reverse that because you might lose your jobs???
>>109612614>We're about to solve scarcitySays who? What's your source for this?
>>109612614>AGIDon't be a fucking rube all your life, Anon.
>>109612623Cognitive work will be solved and thus physical work will be solved.
>>109612614Why do you think th Elites would want to keep you alive for no benefit to themselves or the planet?
>>109612614What’s your race and IQ out of interest?
>>109612614lmao, you will be left to die by your AI overlords, useless eater.
>>109612614It makes humans disposable and no longer necessary to run the planet. Wake the fuck up
>>109612653White. 85.
>>109612614>AGIRetarded pipe dream. If it's real then expect 95% of the population to get culled.
>>109612614>We're about toHow many weeks?
>>109612614>we're about to solve scarcityJust like your bosses said there were going to cure cancer?https://youtu.be/ON-uS-S9cDU
>>109612740>CancerCouldn't have picked a worse thing to use as an example. They're literally using AI to design cancer vaccines>Khattak says that Moderna uses artificial-intelligence tools to identify which neoantigens are most likely to trigger a strong immune response. After the researchers narrow these down experimentally, a limited set are included in the vaccine design for the individual, he adds.https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02612-3
No AI would solve that for you. People has to figure it out themselves. Stop hoping for a miracle.
we've had the best frontier models for 8+ months at this point, and not a single meaningfully cool thing that isn't a toy has been built with themwe are decades away from the "singularity" (if it even happens), and I'm not willing to go jobless for that long
>>109613166It's fake retard. The "AI" they use is ordinary ML. Has been commonly used since the 2010s.
>>109613166>Modernaaren't these the faggots that designed those mass-genocide "flu" vaccines.
>>109612722The moment math problems unsolved buy humans were being solved by AI models to be AGI became plausible goal
>>109612614when i hear 'UBI' it immediately translates to 'permanent underclass' in my head and i wonder if the ones promising penthouses for all are really willing to give up the unobstructed view from their own to make it happen
>>109613408good morning saaar
>>109612614Luddites are mentally ill trans snailcats
AI is only good and making hack-jobs, you are just a moron
>>109613428>luddite>mentally ill>transAll redundant! Say one and it implies all three!
>>109613408>it can solve problems nobody fucking cares aboutWow. So when does it solve actual problems? Why do the major AI players still have human staff? What's the point of having human staff? Can't the AI run the company?
>>109613413Why would it be permanent? Just kill the each and eat their brains.
>>109615151>eachRich. Forgive my AI bot it fucked up that post. Fucking piece of shit.
>>109612614uhhhAGI JUST PWADICTIN DUH TOGENSUHHFWOK CAMEWASUHHHDADA SENTAS DRINKIN DA WADAUHHHHHISWEAW OR SOMETHING
I don’t think I’m oppressing you. It’s possible I might be oppressing you in some way, like a butterfly flapping its wings could cause a storm somewhere else. I want scarcity to be solved too, but I don’t think it’ll happen tomorrow, but maybe it will be in 10 or 20 years, or maybe even less.
>>109612614why do you think there is scarcity today?
Scarcity is how we incentivize wagie servitude. It's not going anywhere. This new choke point will be thought crime and thought fashion.
>>109612614>>109612630
>>109612614>we're about to solve scarcityUhh no we're not.
>>109615231>thought crime and thought fashionto which consequences will never be the same
>>109615338it's a possibility at some point in the future, and maybe in our lifetimes, from videos about the topic I've watched
>>109615368>from videos about the topic I've watched
>>109612614oh scarcity will be solved just not for you, you will be culled in a world war with majority of population. Being needed as workforce is the only thing stopping them from. killing us
>>109612614>solve scarcityIf you think the "AI economy" is wild wait until you find out about consumer spending.
>>109615615This seems extremely plausible.However, if we're still here while nearing the 2040s what then?I couldn't come up with a cope for the elite not having done this by then.
>>109612614you are being sold a lie, but you do you i guess
>>109613166>cancer vaccinesnvm OP is a retarded faggot
>>109612614>We're about to solve scarcityNo we’re fucking not you idiot.
>>109612614Poor people are unironically bigger shitters than rich people and by a long margin
>solve scarcitylol, imagine unironically believing this
>>109612614>We're about to solve scarcityHow the fuck do LLMs lead to that? You retarded cargo cult animal, all AI drones get the rope.
>>109613345Nice, spotted some moskal with AIDS.
>>109615131Good morning, Serb subhuman!
So after trillions of dollars, what have LLMs accomplished? Math no one cares about? Enhanced gooning?If they're so useful, why doesn't Anthropic and OpenAI just send their superagents to make some money?
>>109616997>why doesn't Anthropic and OpenAI just send their superagents to make some money?bruh, have you looked at their finances?
scarcity would be long solved by now if not for capitalism.
Does Claude Code consume more of your limits during peak hours?Right now it doesn't seem to drain too much compared to this afternoon
>>109617637Yes, they're deeply negative and subsist on investor money alone, but investors want to profit which requires a liquidity event. That's why they need to IPO fast at ridiculous valuations. They're also running against the clock because people's hope for AI exponential growth is running out with time as less progress happens. People have been publicly mentioning on linkedin, for example, that they haven't really noticed improvements, and in some cases seen great reduction in performance, in models for about a year now (just the other day, a highly agreed post stated that claude models past 4.7 kept refusing to follow instructions, fable refusing to do anything even in simple research that's not related to tech or bio at all and opus 5 just doing partial work, which results in very poor performance in data extraction - the task was to read financial documents with VAT where claude models refused to believe the VAT rate and insisted the real VAT rate is 3x higher than what the actual financial accounts said... people have been saying the same with gpt models for even longer)So if their models really were so good that they could really create value with them at a monstrous margin as they claim (like recreate a fully functioning o365 stack fully compatible with the files but not microsoft'd, or a full google workplace clone without the scroogle shit), they'd make money hand over fist without going into the whole problem with people who hate ai (they just use ai as a tool to create a profitable business model basically) even while undercutting everyone else, and staying net positive on margins because these are known to already be margin-positive enterprises.
>>109617674and they need investor money as opposed to government money because why?and the public's experience using them is the same as the government's experience because why?
>>109617674>People have been publicly mentioning on linkedin, for example, that they haven't really noticed improvementsit's over AI bros, the bubble is burst
>>109617674you clearly haven't looked into Anthropic's finances.
>>109612639its real retarded to believe elites don't like directing people and managing. Most elites love just making money off people. Running large companies etc. You are a fucking retard if you believe elites don't like people at least in creating/directing. What else would they do? Machines? Who are they going to advertise get to do shit? Doing this with machines might be fine for you a fucking normgroid slave but they need human flesh to tell what to do. It would be like punching a fucking pillow instead of punching someone in the face. You people are the dumbest lowest IQ faggots in existence.
>>109612630>Cognitive workno such thing NERD
>>109617755do you like punching people in the face? are you a boxing or mma or other combat sports world champion?
>>109617788are you implying that humans do all work today and there is no such thing as technology and life will get harder in the future?
>>109612614Maybe wait until people don't have to work. Until then you're just hyping speculation which is why everyone compares "AI bros" to pyramid schemers and altcoin bros. If you're so confident in AI, you should be more than happy to sit back and let the tech prove itself. For some reason though, hype chasers can't do this. You want so much to be on the cutting edge of something that you can't contain yourself.
I don't even have a job.I want to die.
>>109617814>Maybe wait until people don't have to worklmao fucking hell you are dumb
>>109612614you stupid faggot. a fucking statistical averaging machine is not gonna fucking have a cunt hairs effect on the actual, physical finite resources of the natural world
>>109617876Embarrassing. Ask your chatbot to formulate a big boy reply for you, little guy.
sure you're poor now but hold on what if ai will make your dick bigger any day now- ai peddlers for years
>>109612614When (they) solve scarcity (you) won’t get to experience it.
>>109617814People will never not work. Contribution to society will always be valued one way or another and people will always want to have better things and status than others. Just because technically everyone has enough of everything, doesn’t mean it’s enough for everyone. You could argue you can have scarcity now with a very basic job in a western world. Yet here we are. People always want more.
>>109612639>>109618185that Peter Thiel interview comes to mind>you would prefer the human race to endure right?>err uhhhkek
>>109612614 >We're about to solve scarcityHow fucking retarded do you have to be to actually believe that bullshit?
>>109612614
>>109617725>Asking a clanker are you profitable>KEKNot today, tranny.https://isaiprofitable.com/
So long as the elite remain untouchable there will never be utopia. Only if those that control policy and resources fear the populace will things get better. At this point, given the direction of modern "capitalism" (serfdom / eradication of the worker) the best thing that can happen for the average person is societal collapse, a period of anarchy and a founding of a new empire with as much of the current elite removed from it as possible. Smart money is on the eradication of the working class given how mind controlled they are.
>>109617701Because even if the US put 100% of their budget in a single company, it wouldn't match the money requirement they need for the next round. Investors are far richer than governments.
>>109617725Are you, perhaps, clinically retarded?
>>109617707It's a 'rats leaving the ship' indicator.
>>109612614Universe 25, here we go!
>>109615145The fact that it can solve problem nobody has solved before implies it can come up with novel solutions even for problems that matter. Also problems that may seem unimportant can become important later on
>>109615368The only way to solve scarcity is to trick the brain in satisfying all urges through FDVR / simulation
>>109612623Melon Lusk said so.
>>109612614AI-generated water out of thin air? Let's see them try that then
>>109618730That's Malthusian
>>109618718Yes, but it never solved problems people never solved before. It has helped enumerate counterexamples and find such counterexamples, but many of them were so simple that a single bruteforce algorithm would have worked out.
>>109617755>but they need human flesh to tell what to do.Humans will be retarded when an actual ASI begins existing. We are literal monkeys
>>109618989>but it never solved problems people never solved beforeDidn't latest models solve 9 out 353 open Erdos problems though
>>109612614So...When it consume astronomical amount of money and create near 0 profitdestroy huge chunk of jobs , creates 0 new jobs,There is literally 0 output out of itNo single new software Not even one new OS ,or at leas something significant,everything vibe coded is at end of the day DELETED....Guys ... It literally check all boxes for SCAM on mass scale and of EPIC proportions !!!
Don't tell him what the solution to scarcity will end up beingProtip: You can also solve scarcity by reducing demand
>>109618730The brain which requires energy from scarce resources...
>>109620783brain requires very little resources though
>>109612614AI won’t solve scarcity, at least in the short term. Goods and services require two things, raw resources and labour. We are about to solve the labour part, but not the resources part. The resources part might be solved century after AGI/ASI when we build mines on other planets and create matter syphoning megastructures that solve the heavy elements from the Sun reducing its mass and prolonging its lifetime, but until then we are stuck with the same amount of resources we extract now, not to mention speeding up current extraction is already hitting ecological limits. Want to double or triple copper mining and other production? Ok, then have fun making agriculture impossible from global warming. We are already heading for a famine in few years.
>>109618395>almost 2 months old numbersNotably this doesn't include Anthropic's Q2 which is the main topic
>>109612614huh? no, what would that have to do with scarcity? you think your chat bot is going to chat so good that it's going to make more resources pop in from thin air?then you also think that the owners of the chat bot would freely give you those resources, even if they had them available? fucken lmao, you cannot be this dumb
>>109612614I mean if it really does solve scarcity and gives us UBI where no one would actually need to work, I'll be happy. I just want my basic needs met and want to do whatever I want to do all day.
>>109620907How does it not include if the latest data is from July?
>>109621070Because the reports lag behind, dumbass.Th clanker was right: >>109617725https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/15/anthropic-revenue-jumps-to-over-11point5-billion-in-q2-report.html
>>109618730Yeah. And AI will also do that. Why waste time actually doing something when it can reward Hack itself?Bostrom is so dumb thinking the paper clip is the terminal value, and not the reward signal. LOL
>>109612614>AGIWon't be solved by buying all GPUs and RAM in the world. Intelligence is based on the number of interconnects. It took billion years of evolution to build a human brain. You cant just take simple GPU design and make it smaller and then connect more of them together. The processor itself has to be interconnected. You require actual neuromorphic hardware and not just that, it needs to be arranged in 3 dimensions with utmost efficiency and cooling (stacking it in 3d will increase heat generated expenentially, while cooling is surface based and is way way slower). We are FAR away from it. The 2nm node TSMC has? You can't even stack 2 layers of it. And not even mentioning interconnects
>>109621145The attention mechanism does not have an upper bound on possible networking values, it is AGI.People think volition and personality were somehow fundamentally innate, which makes zero fucking sense at any scale.
You're fucking braindead if you think that AI is going to solve scarcity.
>>109612614>We're about to solve scarcityYou surely don't believe the trillion dollars in investments are humanitarian in nature? They don't even remotely act like it BTW.> you guys want to reverse that because you might lose your jobsIf you have reason to doubt scarcity is already solved, then losing your job IS indeed a bad to very bad thing to most.
>>109612614the writing is on the wall since ~2024, owning class wants to physically remove all the other people, thats why they went all in with llm companies founding. Too bad for them, they still need a lot of human talent to make it possible, talentless parasites they are. The only rational step for the rest of humanity is to solve the owning class first.
>>109612614AI solves scarcity by reducing the human population—with less need for labor there is far far less need for workers. The useless eaters hate AI because it means they will die: they are selfish and refuse to sacrifice for the advancement of people who genuinely matter.
>>109621095What reports? None of these are official numbers.
>>109612614>we'll solve scarcity!!>you'll just have to lose the societal means to provide for yourself in the process!!cognitive dissonance
>>109612614scarcity of what? the only thing of abundance AI has granted is niche fetish porn images
>>109612614> We're about to solve scarcityYou mean AGI will let me download RAM for cheap?
>>109612614We already produce enough food to feed the entire world yet there are still people dying from starvation.Scarcity is not the problem, retard.
People are stupid. Get used to this now because tard wrangling will become the only skill that matters in the post-scarcity society.
>>109612614Its not because we would lose our jobs, it's because we would lose our lives.The moment an AGI goes online it means the nearly immediate death of most of humanity. The only ones that would be left alive would be the people who actively work to maintain it. Billionaires want anyone who makes less money than them to die, plain and simple. They will immediately start producing murder drones in unfathomable numbers and program them to kill everyone that isn't in their friend groups so they can inherit the earth free of "the poors". Anyone who thinks this will not happen for whatever reason thinks far to highly of the upper 1%.
>>109623217>Yes it was provided officially by the company itself in ways that would perjure it if they were false, but they are unofficial and don't count because they make me angryokay
>>109619005it doesn't matter elites and humans in general want to order around humans not machines only.
>solve scarcitynot gonna happen>lose your jobsalso not gonna happeni just dont like consuming slop or talking to a stupid chat bot
>>109623632>>lose your jobs>also not gonna happenLol, lmao evenCan't wait to see you cry in /utwg/ that you haven't been able to get an interview in 2 years.
>>109623454>I will absolutely believe one of the main companies shilling LLMs and claiming that they've built the next Skynet and reached singularity every 2 weeks.>This time they're claiming that they have gone from 787m to more than 11b in 1 year.>No any reason to doubt them at all.KEK. I bet you got vaxxed and boosted as well, you dumb gullible nigger.
>>109625173
>>109612614what happens to global population levels when you remove scarcity? We're at 8 billion already.
