Here's your heckin based brilliant tech founder who started with nothing and did NOT use 1960s Braun products as inspiration for almost all his hardware designs, bro. He's just like you and me.
>>109613741He was already a world famous multimillionaire by 1986.. Compared to the other FAGMAN company founders he and Woz kinda did start from nothing. Pretty average middle class background. Of course, everything was easier back then
>>109613741It is obviously obvious the most desirable jobs are just a dummy psyop.
>>109613810baldie here and the succ didn't start from wealth neither, it is mostly microslop that went from wealthy to ultra wealthy.
>>109614510His dad gabe him 50kMy dad gabe me 10k
>>109614510I dunno, Bezos was an investment banker, the parents of Zuck and the Google founders were upper middle class jews (same for Sam Altman's parents, incidentally)To me it seems self evident though that most high profile billionaires come from an upper middle class background. They don't already have something to inherit so they have to build an empire themselves which is what makes you publicly known, but they need to at least be upper middle class to get into the right schools etc to make that happen.
>>109614510Zuck came from wealth. His dad was able to buy one of the earliest personal computers available for over one bazilmilion bucks (kidding, it was rich people-exclusive stuff but not that expensive) despite "only" being a dentist.Bezos also came from wealth. Brin was soviet crime families and government.
>>109614510baldie there had a wall street career. Jobs had pretty much nothing.
>>109614510succ's family had enough connections to land him state funding and state contracts.Either you're born into wealth or you're little people. That's how it always been.
>>109613741why did they swap chips?
Sounds like you're saying NeXT had actual merit, a system good enough governments invested in it. Impressive.
