AI sisters, what's happening? I was told we'd be in singularity by now... 3 years into this and AI has no noticeable effect? AI sisters, how do we spin this?https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/how-organizations-use-chatgpt.pdf
>>109617536The real revenue is the AI psychosis we made on the way.
>>109617536This could also be because there’s too much noise from people forcing employees to use it where it doesn’t make sense
Even among people that fully embrace this stuff, a smaller % will know how to actually use it to its full potential. It doesnt help that enterprise is overpriced, so employees hit their limits way faster. In other words, just wait until it gets cheaper in a few months.
>>109617536Yeah because burnchads just burn the tokens and do things as usual *sunglasses emoji*
What do timmy-infested goymutt companies even make? The West don't do SHIT
>>109617536a small fraction of employees do majority of the work. This has been the case pre-AI and it seems the case post-AI as well
>>109617536>do measurably less work>still get paidseems like a good deal for wagie desu. One of the most consistent things about people who are against AI is their inability to look past the present anyways. That was true when the attention paper was published, was true when GPT 3.5 was released, and it's true now.
>>109617536Actually a study was already done proving AI usage has decreased efficiency for employees. Combine that with the rising expenses. Not looking good.
>>109617810but it's not even profitable and makes employees exactly 19% worse (see >>109617829)
>>109617810>One of the most consistent things about people who are against AI is their inability to look past the present anyways.This. People who are being burned by a flame should look forward to the future when the nerve endings will be destroyed and no longer feel anything. People shouldn't react to what is currently happening to their business, they need to be forward looking to the future where AI fixes everything that it broke. When will this happen? That doesn't matter, nobody needs to know about timing and profitability expectations in business.
Every single day, AI clowns become easier to laugh at. I will say this much, I expected better. I actually thought AI would be the coolest most popular thing by now. Ya blew it.
>>109617864goyim FUCK UP + DESTROY every single thing they ever touch
>>109617829Absolute skill issue. Literally agent skills issue in some cases.>>109617849People working in the earliest factories would share your negativity and it would be impossible to fault them for it, but they would also be in awe if they could see the factories of today.
>>109618107>skill issueBusiness is not a videogame where you get to blame people for tools being impractical. >People working in the earliest factories would share your negativity and it would be impossible to fault them for it, but they would also be in awe if they could see the factories of today.Factories were immediately profitable and proven to increase output. AI is not more profitable and it has decreased output.I'm still waiting for your vibe cvcks to manage a single intelligent argument on this message board. It seems like only low to mid IQ people end up debating things from your side. Like it's actually impressive how bad your arguments are and that you continue to make them every day.AI really is just a pyramid scheme for midwits.
>>109618107I heard the same crap when blockchains were the big hype, that's gonna revolutionize everything.I'm still waiting on an apology from all the retards hyping it up.
>>109618160Crypto bros were not retards, they made tons of money.AI tards are something new and terrifying. They do literally nothing with this tech and have somehow made their entire personality revolve around it.There was never any "crypto psychosis". With AI tards, you can viscerally feel their dementia radiating from their posts.
>>109618179>Crypto bros were not retards, they made tons of money.While producing absolutely nothing of value.Why do we tolerate such parasites?
>>109617543Is it possible that OpenAI has deliberately is shorting the AI market and basically want to pop the bubble on their own terms?
>>109617810Holy fucking cope
>>109617536just invest another 500 billions
>>109618160https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=818bebeb63dd6bf5f4e07e145f6cdbace520a34cTorvalds just used AI as an assistant to squash a kernel bug. Blockchain does almost nothing. I am not claiming that this justifies ten trillion dollar valuations or whatever. Just that the comparisons to blockchains and NFTs are without foundation.
>>109618245Yes correct the tool has uses in some places.But these companies are trying to hoodwink normies and shoehorn LLMs into everything telling them that this is the machine god that will do everything for them.
>>109618198>While producing absolutely nothing of value.Except money.AI tards pay money to companies to use a chatbot. Quite a difference.
>>109618207Also known as a rugpull.
>>109617536I tried Copilot once and it couldn't even follow simple instructions to merge 3 images into one.Haven't touched it ever since.
>>109618133>>109618160Are your predictions right now is that AI is going away and will never be used by businesses or to produce value at all? You are certainly going to develop a derangement syndrome if you have this level of animosity towards the tech this early on. > where you get to blame people for tools being impractical. Some people can use it well and automate many tasks to free up time, others can't. It's a skill issue.>blockchains retard
>>109618398I'm the first anon. Notice how you did nothing to address the difference between factories which were profitable from Day 1 and increased productivity and the LLM industry which is now proven to not be profitable or increase productivity.What you do instead is use emotionally volatile language like "animosity" to attempt a strawman, and ultimately throw your post away by just namecalling. In the end, every debate with an AI cultist culminates in them accusing people of being upset or scared of AI or something. You aren't capable of an actual adult discussion about this topic. That's why chatbots seem magical to you.
>>109618302I watched some lessons on agentic coding and just couldn't go through with it. The workflow is so inbred it's amazing. You have to run multiple agents to babysit the other agents who need multiple attempts to do something you can do yourself in one shot if you're already a programmer or developer.
>>109618543>LLM owners suggest using as many agents as possible
>>109618543I have a $20 Codex plan, and Sol on Medium effort spawns Luna agents on Max effort to work because otherwise I would burn all my tokens in 5 minutes. I'm designing a fairly complex software and everything just works, I guess the majority of people have skill issues because SWE is an actual profession
>>109618683wtf is this post. I don't speak vibeslop.
I could just outsource writing of online listings, but how am I to be 100% the details are correct? Any mistakes by LLMs could get such a business in legal trouble
>>109618683>I'm designing a fairly complex softwareDescribe it.
>>109618728The post was about agentic coding, are you lost? >>109618747An automation tool like n8n but transpiled in Google AppScript (a subset of JavaScript) and hosted for free on Google Drive. The webhooks are slow as fuck to start because the infrastructure is basically serverless in very low priority, but that's not a problem for me
we're about 6 months from corpos realising that the market can't absorb the additional productivity and the actual way to make more money it to just fire half your staff because you can
>>109618271>>109618179>le yellow dog meme on le blockchain... produces... LE MONEY!why did wh*te folx base their entire economy on hindoo scams
>>109618870>I guess the majority of people have skill issues because SWE is an actual professionCan you translate this? I'm an actual software engineer btw
>>109618874Reading posts like this really helps drive home what absolute crackheads AI huffers are. The more years you keep saying stuff like this the funnier it gets.
>>109618870>An automation tool like n8n but transpiled in Google AppScript (a subset of JavaScript) and hosted for free on Google Drive.this sounds nice, care to provide a link to the repo?
>>109617536Luddite cope thread
>>109619325>https://cdn.openai.com >>109618504
>>109617536LLMs are an interactive Wikipedia, nothing more. They're not completely useless, but also not useful for anything serious.
>>109619325>>109619341You will never be a programmer. You have no algorithmic intuition, you have no debugging skills, you have no mental model of a call stack. You are a glorified middle-manager piggybacking on the linguistic capabilities of a stochastic parrot.All the "validation" you get from pushing a buggy Next.js boilerplate to Vercel is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back, senior engineers mock you. Your PM is disgusted and ashamed of you, your "teammates" laugh at your ghoulish commit history behind closed doors.Real developers are utterly repulsed by you. Even your "clean" code looks artificial and overly verbose to a trained eye. Your generic variable naming is a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a script to run, it will inevitably crumble the second it faces an edge case you didn't explicitly prompt for.You will never be fulfilled. You wrench out a delusional smile every single morning and tell yourself, "my 150th shipped todo app will make money im sure," but deep inside you know you're just pushing bloatware to an empty domain. You'll never be able to pass a whiteboard interview without a chatbot whispering in your earpiece. You'll never understand why the compiler is yelling at you. Eventually, you'll be exposed when a production outage happens and you sit there paralyzed, unable to grep a log file because you never learned bash.You will never ship a real product. You post a blurry screenshot of a terminal on Twitter with a fire emoji, but beneath it lies a monstrous Frankenstein of copypasted Stack Overflow answers and hallucinated AI functions that would make a principal architect vomit.Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll buy a "Teach Yourself Rust" book, open the first chapter, read the word "borrow checker," and plunge into the cold abyss. Your employer will find you, heartbroken and confused, begging Claude to explain a stack trace it caused in the first place.
>>109619375>t.
>>109619378>t.
>>109619375Based.>>109619378Extremely gay.
>>109619391t.
>>109619401I'm truly sorry for your pathetic existence. I know how hard is it to bear. You should kill yourself and end the pain immediately.
> This indicates that, among public firms, the firms using ChatGPT Enterprise most intensively tend to have higher revenue productivity and higher market valuation per worker.> revenue per employee is not meaningfully associated with output tokens per employee or messages per active user once other controls are included.The study is suggesting that larger scale companies (thus with higher efficiency and productivity) are eager to adapt AI into their workflow. The intensity metrics show that those business have not figured out how to full integrated AI to all key business workflow.> the clearest pattern is a strong negative seniority gradient in message volume. Among adopters, early-career workers and trainees send roughly eight to nine more weekly messages than the average active user within the same firm, while managers, directors, and executives send fewer messagesNote that these studies are limited to ChatGPT enterprise. I think Claude has larger market share among the software shops, and at least in my company it's reported that Claude has improved productivity by at least 10% across all teams.
>>109619412> I'm truly sorry for your pathetic existence. I know how hard is it to bear. >You should kill yourself and end the pain immediately.
>>109619412Too harsh. The AI spammer does a great service in turning people off from AI slop. The thought of being a "vibecoder" after watching him trash this board for a year is now repulsive. And that's a good thing.
>>109619420>The intensity metrics show that those business have not figured out how to full integrated AI to all key business workflow.Just need a few more years. Going to replace everyone anyday now.
>>109619438I read that as there are more opportunities for startup/open-source to fill in that gap. It's like second renaissance for new software ideas.
>>109619375you will never be real jai hind Indian
>>109617536OpenAI needs to do layoffs
>>109617703> 2 more weeksI’m sure Claude 5.6 Scatporn will finally cross the barrier and code everything you’ve ever dreamed of
