>>109624414
It's good

There's multiple threads about it everyday

>>109624414
just werks for me (even banking on a separate profile)
pixel battery is shit with or without grapheneOS
btw it's probably an ANOM tier honeypot, but idc

completely useless in an age of flock cameras, palantir and 24/7 surveillance

Is there any proof that the signed images actually match what you can build from the source code?

>>109624414
It's about no-brainer for me, in just going to continue using GrapheneOS, simple as

>>109624616
sha512sum signedimg
sha512sum yourversionfromsource
compare
wew lad
non-meme answer: https://github.com/lucasbeiler/reproducible-builds-grapheneos

>>109624414
Its good, but I dropped it for a new fold. Nothing wrong with it and I KNOW I am giving up telemetry, but IDGAF, I like the Fold a lot and am actually 3x times more productive with it.
I hardened it as much as a I could, but still.
But, yeah, Graphene is pretty solid and probably the most private of all the alts out there.

Doesn't work on my phone.

>>109624414
I don't get why there is so much controversy around it, while there never was with any other AOSP fork. They must be doing something right I suppose.

Needs wider support than just fucking google products.
Here's hoping their motorola partnership will expand to more than just one phone.

>>109624414
> only on Google phones
Honeypot

>>109624414
>Only runs on a handful of google devices. And google has stopped providing source code for drivers for new android version so it's basically fucked
>hardening is actually good
>tries to isolate apps and provide google services
When the devil possesses you, you don't surrender a part of your body to him to isolate the evil. Instead you call an exorcist to banish him. The solution is clear: only run code that you trust i.e. have compiled yourself. All this executing of binary malware believing in isolation is doomed from the start
>dev are cringe

I might actually get a motorola with gos next year. Right now i'm on googleless lineage

>>109625673
retard

>>109625733
But that's a choice that GrapheneOS gives. i don't use anything google related on my device, but most retards do, normies are the ones using GrapheneOS just to use google

>>109625829
Thanks, i thought it included sandboxed play services by default. I just reread the faq
https://grapheneos.org/faq#google-services
>GrapheneOS doesn't include Google apps and services. They won't ever be bundled with the OS. GrapheneOS includes a compatibility layer for sandboxed Play services to make user installed Play services apps able to run as fully sandboxed, unprivileged apps.

>>109625829
Even if normies use Google Apps on GOS it's still better than using stock since you can't refuse Google permissions on it and have to take it in the ass

>>109625903
you should hazard a read of the joins of dumb shit the normies gravitating towards GrapheneOS are doing, you'll hate them even more. they literally use GrapheneOS just to use google

File: 1766337487068608.png (431 KB, 1080x1764)

431 KB PNG

>>109625929
kind* of

their goal is to hide from google she other big tech slop while using google and big tech slop on a GrapheneOS device

>>109624414
An Apple iPhone is almost as private as GrapheneOS, without all the autism shit.

>>109625957
>almost
I'll pass

>>109625957
>women phone
hard pass