Anon's fav license?
>>109641932I only vibe code so technically everything is public domain but I never disclose the code to anyone.
>>109641932AGPL-3.0-only.
>>109641932gplv3 only
>>109642016>AGP
>>109641932AGPL or BSD, depending on the project
>>109641932MIT+nigger
they're all tl;dr and I'll do whatever I want with the code including modifying it and selling it without attribution
>>109641932GPL definitely.
>>109641932aren't these all obsolete since LLMs?
https://opensource.org/license/ms-pl
>>109642026>>109642057why GPL over AGPL?
>>109641932FSF should create a new licence, especially for AI and AI models since the very concept breaks the idea of open source.
>>109641932pic related
>>109641932why are the 2 "patent use" rows dfferent?
driver's license
>>109642169TV license
>>109642132It's a weird way of depicting it, but basically the ones that have both colours don't explicitly offer a patent grant, but they also don't explicitly say that they *don't* offer it either (which would be kinda pointless and redundant, but some licences like to include that bit for clarity).
>>109641932im colorblind so there is little to no difference between the licenses
MIT for errythang
>>109641932I haven't written anything besides Python scripts and C leetcode, but everything I write is AGPLv3 just to poison the well
>>109642219lol same, it's astounding to me just how many people who specifically make charts and GUIs are clueless about it
>>109642016ThisFuck proprietary shit
for permissive: BSD 2 Clausefor copyleft: GPLv2-only/LGPLv2.1-only
>>109642177It's got a "c", so it's actually "loicence".
Public Domain
>>109641932> row 1: patent use> row 2: patent useI don't get it
>>109642044this
>>109642219>colorblindsame, couldn't see differencefixed somewhat for folks like us
>>109641932wtfpl
>>109642071because those anons dont know about agpl
>>109642074you cant copyright LLM output, so what license would that be?
>>109643563I'm talking specifically about models which don't follow traditional software rules.
>>109641932WTFPLAll other licenses are bloat.
>>109642244>it's astoundingits very simple, 99.9% of the people on this planet arent color blind
>>109641932License are for queersDo everything illegallyDo not answer to men who sign contracts or swear oaths.
AGPL+nigger
>>109643585>traditional software rulesyou mean copyright law, that'll hold up in court for sure
>>109641932Motorcycle license. Nothing like two wheels and an open road
>>109641932Unlicense. I'm not dealing with IP shit.
>>109641932I like how MPL-2.0 is limited by file boundaries.That's enough for what I need.
>>109643624The patrician's choice.
>>109641932>patent use: no>patent use: yeshuh?
>>109642016/thread
>>109642215you can register a patent for other peoples code if they dont explicitly forbid it? actually now that i think about it cant you *always* apply for a patent as long as nobody else has registered it? but patents are for the underlying technique / idea, not the code, so what the fuck does the license have to do with it at all? surely it doesn't have a say on whether i register whatever its doing as my own personal patent because they haven't done it before
My stuff? No open sauce license whatsoever Others? Agpl 3, please
>>109641932anything compatible with +NIGGER
Open RPG Creative license. Fuck WotC.
>>109641932Apache 2, because I'm not a fucking nigger.
>>109641932I usually write my own license which is basically MIT for every use-case except commercial use.
what fucking retard designed this?
>>109641932>ai slop picrel threadI don't know why is still come here. and by here I mean the internet.
